A Causal Relationships between Job Resources, Proactive Coping, Engagement in Work, and Burnout Work of Secondary School Teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were to develop and validate a causal relationships between job resources, proactive coping, engagement in work, and burnout in work of secondary school teachers The sample comprised 500 teachers who were in secondary schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 17 in Chanthaburi and Trad Province (academic year 2015) selected by Multi-stage random sampling. A five rating scale questionnaire was used in this study. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics: frequency, percentage, mean. Causal relationship model was analyzed by LISREL 8.80.
The results indicated the engagement in work and job resources value had a direct effect on burnout in work of the secondary school teachers, job resources and proactive coping had an indirect effect on burnout in work through engagement in work value. The proposed model was consistent with the empiritical data. Goodness of fit statistics were: chi- square test=98.94, df =97, p =.43, GFI = 0.98, SRMR = .03 and RMSEA = .01. The variables in the proposed model accounted for 87 percent of the total variance of burnout in work.
Article Details
References
2. ศิรินันท์ กิตติสุขสถิต. (2556). คุณภาพชีวิตการทำงานและความสุข. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ธรรมดาเพรส.
3. Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2005). The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples. Human Relations, 58(5): 661-689.
4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement.Career development international, 13(3): 209-223.
5. Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and OrganizationalPsychology, 83(1): 189-206.
6. Bermejo, L., Hernández-Franco, V., & Prieto-Ursúa, M. (2013). Teacher Well-being: personal and job resources and demands. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84: 1321-1325.
7. Cherniss, C. (1992). Long-term consequences of burnout: An exploratory study. Journal of organizational Behavior, 13: 1-11.
8. Cooper-Thomas, H. D., Paterson, N. L., Stadler, M. J., & Saks, A. M. (2014). The relative importance of proactive behaviors and outcomes for predicting newcomer learning, well-being, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior: 84(3): 318-331.
9. Greenglass, E. (2004). Coping with the threat of severe acute respiratory syndrome: Role of threat appraisals and coping responses in health behaviors. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1): 9-23.
10. Jackson, S. E., Schwab, R. L., & Schuler, R. S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of applied psychology, 71(4): 630.
11. Roslan, N. A., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I., & Sambasivan, M. (2015). Job Demands & Job Resources: Predicting Burnout and Work Engagement among Teachers. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 84: 138-144.
12. Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of managerial psychology, 21(7): 600-619.
13. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness studies, 3(1): 71-92.
14. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: A multi‐sample study. Journal of organizational Behavior, 25(3): 293-315.
15. Van Beek, I., Taris, T. W., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: dead ringers or worlds apart?. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4): 468.
