Factors of Quality of Working Life that Affected the Personnel Organizational Commitment in Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate of factors of quality of working life that affected the personnel organizational commitment in Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University, to compare organizational commitment among personnel factors and to study the relationship between quality of working life and organizational commitment among the person. The sample consisted of 262 full-time people working in Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University. The instrument was a questionnaire. The statistics used were applied to analyze quantitative data were comprised of descriptive statistics; frequency, percentage, arithmetic mean and standard deviation, t-test, F-test and pearson product-moment correlation coefficient. The results were found as follow:

            The sample was mainly single females, 31–40 years old. They were instructors with a master degree and their salary was 20,001-30,000 baht. They had worked for more than 6 years.  

            The quality of working life of the university personnel was at a moderate level. The aspects of the quality of working life were in 6 dimension : physical, administration, human resource administration, personnel, social and economic where as the personnel dimension was rated at a high level while the physical dimension was the last.

            The relationship among the personnel in the university was at a high level. The highest aspect was willing to work for the university while being membership was the lowest.

            The relationship between male and female personnel was significantly different at 0.05 level. There were no different relationship among those who were different age, working status, marital status and salary.

            The relationship between quality of working life that affected the personnel organizational commitment in Rambhai Barni Rajabhat University were positively correlated  or the same direction, with the significant level at 0.01.The correlation coefficient was moderate (r=0.43).