Enhancing Local Access to Justice: An Analysis of Legal Impediments and Proactive Frameworks for Establishing Local Government Legal Aid Centers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This academic article analyzes the legal authority and practical obstacles regarding the establishment of legal aid centers by Local Administrative Organizations (LAOs) in Thailand. By utilizing a doctrinal legal research methodology that relies on the interpretation of relevant administrative laws and regulations, this study posits that access to the justice system is a fundamental right of citizens, although socio-economic inequality continues to serve as a significant barrier. Since Local Administrative Organizations are the administrative agencies closest to the public, they play a crucial role in providing public services that offer essential legal assistance. This article aims to examine the legal basis under administrative law, identify obstacles arising from rules and regulations, and propose a model for establishing a “Legal Aid Center” at the local level. The findings revealed that although the primary objective of decentralization is to empower local authorities to provide public services that protect citizens' rights, the practical implementation of legal aid still encounters critical challenges. While the establishment of legal aid centers is vital for decentralizing the justice process, their operation currently experiences three primary obstacles: (1) an ambiguity exists regarding the scope of statutory authority within the organizing laws of Local Administrative Organizations, (2) restrictive budgetary regulations complicate the disbursement of remuneration for legal advisors, and (3) their missions overlap with those of central government agencies. Furthermore, despite possessing functional authority under the Determining Plans and Process of Decentralization to Local Administrative Organization Act, B.E. 2542 (1999), LAOs have yet to fully exercise their mandate in delivering legal aid services in practice, as greater clarity is required in the interpretation of the Ministry of Interior's budgetary rules, along with improvements to operational structures. Consequently, this article proposes comprehensive guidelines for structural and regulatory reforms to ensure that local legal aid centers can genuinely serve the public in compliance with the principles of administrative law. Specifically, the study advocates for a proactive "Legal Aid Center" model achieved through the enactment of local ordinances to validate the centers' legal status. Additionally, it recommends that the Ministry of Interior enhance financial flexibility within its regulations. This shift will effectively transform the role of local authorities from administrative order-issuing bodies into facilitators of grassroots justice, which will ultimately reduce social inequality and sustainably strengthen the mechanisms for protecting citizens' rights and liberties.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. (2017). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 134(40a).
Determining Plans and Process of Decentralization to Local Government Organization Act, B.E. 2542. (1999). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 116(114a).
Determining Plans and Process of Decentralization to Local Government Organization Act, B.E. 2542. (1999, November 17). Royal Thai Government Gazette, 116(109a), 1-7.
Galanter, M. (2019). Access to justice in a world of expanding social capability. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 46(4), 911–927.
Garner, H. (2020). Community legal empowerment: A framework for supporting grassroots lawyering. Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy, 27(2), 203–225.
Hunsathanakit, S. (2023). Access to justice at the community level: Problems and solutions. Srinakharinwirot University Law Journal, 14(1), 78-95.
Kamolsuksathit, S. (2020). Administrative law and cases within the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University, 14(1), 34-47.
Kanjanadun, P. (2020). The rule of law and the exercise of state power. Kasetsart University Law Journal, 50(2), 67-89.
Krea-ngam, W. (2023). Collaboration between educational institutions and local government organizations: Approaches and possibilities.Thammasat University ,45-49
Lertkusolkit, S. (2022). Development of legal service delivery models in communities. Naresuan University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 201-223.
Limprasert, S. (2018). Reducing inequality in access to justice in Thai society through community justice. Rangsitsarn Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 45-58.
Open Society Justice Initiative. (2016). Community-based paralegals. A practitioner's guide.
Rak-yutidham, S. (2022). Decentralization and local justice administration in Thailand. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Sawan Rajabhat University, 14(2), 45-60.
Singkaneti, B. (2019). Fundamental principles of rights, liberties, and human dignity (6th ed.). Winyuchon.
Subdistrict Council and Subdistrict Administrative Organization Act, B.E. 2537 (1994). Office of the Council of State.
Vanichbuncha, K. (2021). Management of local government organizations in the digital age. Chiang Mai University Journal of Political Science, 15(2), 45-67.
Varanyoo, V. (2020). Explanation of administrative law. Winyuchon.