THE CONTENT ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION PRIVATE UNIVERSITY

  • Ongad Sirimettaporn Nakhonratchasima College
  • Chanadda Sirmettporn Nakhonratchasima College
  • Tassana Ketmanee Nakhonratchasima College
Keywords: The Content Analysis, Classification of Dissertation

Abstract

         The purposes of this study were as follows: 1) to classify the Educational Administration Ph.D. researches based on research methodology of Private University 2) to know the knowledge gained from the findings in the synthesis of the Educational Administration Ph.D. researches of Private University 3) to provides knowledge-oriented policy from result. The research findings revealed as follow: 1. Classification results of the dissertation thesis Major in Educational Administration of Private University. The concept of research was classified based on the conceptual framework in the field of educational administration of Boyan which was divided into five issues, administrator, organization, politics and economics, finance and special topics. 2. The results of the study and analysis of the knowledge obtained from the findings of the 320 dissertation thesis related to the administration of education. 3. Educational Policy Recommendations, the findings in the dissertation, the researcher can conclude as a policy recommendation to apply the development of Thai education in the future into 5 key points based on Boyan’s conceptual framework as following: 1) Policy Recommendations for Executives. 2) Policy Recommendations on the Organization. 3) Policy Recommendations on Politics and Policy. 4) Policy Recommendations on Economics and Finance. 5) Policy Recommendations on Other Issues Related to Educational Administration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kietanant Luankaw. (2016). เมื่อ Thailand 4.0 ถูกขับเคลื่อนด้วย Education 2.0. จังหวัดปฏิรูปการเรียนรู้. จดหมายข่าวสารปัญญา, (26), 1-4.

Ratana Buason & Others. (2011). การสังเคราะห์งานวิจัยของวิทยาลัยเซนต์หลุยส์ ระหว่างปีการศึกษา 1985-2009.วิทยาลัยเซนต์หลุยส์.

Sakorn Sooksriwong. (2008). การจัดการ จากมุมมองนักบริหาร. Bangkok: ศูนย์หนังสือ จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย

Chester I. Barnard. (1971). The Function of the Executive. Cambridge: HarvardUniversity.

Clark, M., Caffarella, R. S., and Ingram, P.B. (1999). Women in leadership: Living with the constraints of the glass ceiling. England: Trentham Book.

Coleman Marianne. (2002). Women as headteachers: Striking the balance. England: Trentham Books.

Haughton, E. (2002). Why it’s still hard to be a woman. England: Trentham Book.

Hellriegel Don , Susan E. Jackon and John W. Slocum.(2005). Management International Student, 10thed. Ohio: Thompson Corporation.

John Rowls. (1971). A Theory of Justice. New York: A Harvard paperback.

Joseph L. Massie. (1964). Essential of Management. New York: Prentice-Hall Inc., Company.

Kieth David. (1967). Human Relation of Work. New York: McGrawHill Book Company.

Norman J. Boyan. (1981). R & D Strategies for Staff Development for Career Education, San Francisco: Far West Lab. For Educational Research and Development.

Robert L. Katz. (1955). Skills of Effective Administration. Harvard Business Review 33.

Thelbert L. Drake & William H. Roe. (1986). The Principalship, 3rded. New York :Macmillan.

Thomas S. Snyder, and Charlene M. Hoffman. (2002). Digest of educationstatistics. D.C. National Center for Educational Statistics .

William H. Newman.(1983). Administrative Action, 2nded. Englewood Cliffs, NewJersey : Prentice-Hall.

Published
2021-09-14
Section
Research Articles