Guidelines for the acquisition of senators of Thailand compared To United Kingdom United States and The Republic of France

Abstract

          The purposes of the research are to fight the concept. Theory: Research, related to the approach to the acquisition of senators It recommends amendments to legislation relating to the approach to the acquisition of Senators of Thailand compared to the UK. United States and The Republic of France It is qualitative research by researching data from documents. Study and analyze ideas Theory Related Research Internet Information Articles in journals, textbooks, both foreign and Thai. Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, 1997, 2007, 2017. The result revealed that the guidelines for the acquisition of senators in accordance with the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand Buddhist Era 2017 has not been successful when it was applied to Thai society. This is because differences in political history and development in law are linked to the country's political sociological conditions. This will be consistent with and relevant to the role of the senator. Compared to the UK, it's not the same. United States and The Republic of France. The Senate has the power and role to balance and beam power with the administration. The acquisition of the Senate must be indirectly elected by the people to participate in the election. This allows the acquired senators to understand the living conditions and the real needs of the people.

          Therefore, the researchers saw that based on the concept, Theory, relevant research and guidelines for the acquisition of senators Important to Thailand's governing body. And comparing Thai law with the UK, it's not a good relationship. The United States and the Republic of France should propose amendments to the legislative measures to internationalize the acquisition of senators. By amending the Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand. Section 269 (1) (c) of the Senate's entry into office by appointment. And add a new message as a acquisition of the Senate by a divided election by means of direct and secret voting, which would allow for a true explanation of the connection to people's sovereignty under democratic rule.