Strategies and factors affective the competitive advantage of private universities in the Bangkok metropolitan area Regian.
Keywords:
Competitive strategies , modern management, Electronic service quality, Development of Competitive Advantage, A private universityAbstract
This research examines the impact of competitive strategies and modern management of service quality on the performance of private universities in the Bangkok Metropolitan region. The qualitative research sample includes personnel from private universities and administrative staff in business administration and education. who completed questionnaires. The findings reveal the following: Respondent demographics. The differentiation strategy, emphasizing Thai and foreign teachers with expertise and qualifications, achieved the highest average of Low-cost strategies, including installment-based student loan systems, had the highest average of Strategies focusing on specific groups, such as managing campus traffic, achieved an average of .Integration strategies, where teachers support students' studies, scored an average of Modern management practices, including planning, teaching arrangements,
The study highlights the importance of differentiation in curriculum design, quality teaching, and modern facilities. Fast and effective management systems, coupled with responsive service, play a critical role in creating competitive advantages.
References
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Insee, N., & Suttipun, M. (2023). Spending advantage and firm performance in Thailand: An empirical study of listed firms. Asian Journal of Business Research, 13(2), 36-48.
Kingoo, R. N. (2014). Determinants of competitive advantage among private universities in Kenya (Ph.D.). St. Paul's University. https://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/10159
Kitcharoen, K. (2004). The importance-performance analysis of service quality in administrative departments of private universities. ABAC Journal, 24(3), 20-46.
Kotler, P. (1995). Marketing management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Meyer Research Center by POPAL.
Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing management (9th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management (10th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kroll, M. (1999). The contribution of product quality to competitive advantage: Impacts on systematic variance and unexplained variance in returns. Strategic Management Journal.
Lisnawati, T., & Gunarto, H. (2021). The influence of uniqueness resources and competitive advantage towards business performance of SMEs. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(4), 45-57.
Lovelock, C. H., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Services marketing: People, technology, strategy. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Plungpongpan, J., Tiangsoongnern, L., & Speece, M. (2015). University social responsibility and brand image of private universities in Bangkok. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 1-8.
Reimann, B. C., & Reichert, A. (1996). Portfolio planning methods for strategic capital allocation: A survey of Fortune 500 firms. International Journal of Management (March).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pacific Institute of Management Science

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สถาบันวิทยาการจัดการแห่งแปซิฟิค
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับสถาบันวิทยาการจัดการแห่งแปซิฟิค และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในสถาบันฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว
