Exploring Orientations toward STEM Education of Pre-service Science Teachers

Main Article Content

ชุติมา วิชัยดิษฐ1
ชาตรี ฝ่ายคำตา2

Abstract

Orientations toward STEM Education is a key component that articulate and predict teaching’s practices
in their classroom. The objectives of this study was explore orientations toward STEM education of 24 fourth
year pre-service science teachers who were studying in the bachelor of education in majoring science in
science teaching. Open-ended questionnaire including understandings of each discipline in STEM education,
the importance of teaching STEM education, designing STEM education activities ; role of teachers and
students, teaching strategies, instructional media, and assessment of student learning. The data gathered
were analyzed by interpretive. The findings indicate that pre-service science teachers held partial understandings
of STEM education including characteristics of each discipline in STEM education (science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics). The orientation towards STEM education of pre-service teachers relied on
project-based learning.

Article Details

How to Cite
วิชัยดิษฐ1 ช., & ฝ่ายคำตา2 ช. (2018). Exploring Orientations toward STEM Education of Pre-service Science Teachers. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal, 11(3), 165–174. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/rmuj/article/view/144783
Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education :
A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering
Teacher, PP. 30-35.
[2] O’Neill,T., L.Yamagata, J. Yamakata and S. Togioka.
(2012). Teaching STEM Means Teacher Learning.
Phi Delta Kappan. 94(1) : 36-40.
[3] Magnusson, S., J. Krajcik and H. Borko. (1999).
Nature, Sources, and Development of Pedagogical
Content Knowledge for Science Teaching. In J.
Gess-Newsome and N.G. Lederman (Eds.),
Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge : the
Construct and its Implications for Science
Education (pp. 95-132). Dordrecht : Kluwer.
[4] Friedrichsen, P., D. Lankford, P. Brown, E. Pareja,
M. Volkmann, and S. Abell. (2007). The PCK of
Future Science Teachers in an Alternative
Certification Program. Paper presented at the
National Association for Research in Science
Teaching Annual Conference. New Orleans, LA.
[5] Park and J. S. Oliver. (2008). “Revisiting the
Conceptualization of Pedagogical Content
Knowledge (PCK) : PCK as a Conceptual Tool to
Understand Teachers as Professionals,” Research
in Science Education. 38 : 261-284.
[6] Buaraphan, Khajonsak; Rodraengkla, Wanthipha;
Srisukwattananan, Phawinee; Sing, Phenjan.
(2007). Development and Survey of Knowledge
in Content and Teaching Method of Physics
Student and Teacher from the Teaching Method
Subject to Experience Teacher Training. The 45th
National Academic Conference of Kasetsart
University : Education, Economics and Business
Administration and Humanities and Social
Sciences Program, Kasetsart University.
[7] Friedrichsen P. M., H. Jan and D. Van. (2011).
Taking a Closer Look at Science Teaching
Orientations. Science Education. 95 : 358 - 376.
[8] Kadriye B., Y. Hülya, S. Ahmet. (2016). Determining
pre-service teachers’ Goalorientations for learning
through a card-sortingactivity. International
Journal of Learning and Teaching. Volume 8 (1)
: 40-52.
[9] Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogy. Teaching
and Teacher Education. 20 : 489-504.
[10] Kaya, O.N. (2009). “The Nature of Relationships
among the Components of Pedagogical Content
Knowledge of Preservice Science Teacher : Ozone
layer Depletion’as an example”, International
Journal of Science Education. 7(1) : 961-988.
[11] Brown, P., P. Friedrichsen and S. Abell, (2013). The
Development of Prospective Secondary Biology
Teachers PCK. Journal of Science Teacher
Education. 24(1) : 133-155.
[12] Promkhadkeaw, Thepkatya; Sung-orng, Sunan and
Keawwaiyuth, Smarn. (2007). “Semi-structured
Interview Development for Studying the Concept
and Teaching Method of Science Nature”, Song
klanakarin Journal of Social Sciences and
Humanities. 13(4) : 513-523.