The Emotional Quotient and Conflict Resolution of School Administrators Under Office of the Basic Education
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of research are divided into three parts; 1) For case study the level of Emotional Maturity of
the administrator’s education Under Office of the Basic Education 2) For case study in term of the method’s
solution of the administrator’s education under control of the Primary Educational Service Area Office 1. 3)
For case study the relation between of the Emotional Maturity and the level of selecting on the conflict of the
administrator’s education under Under Office of the Basic Education.
The population’s research is administrator’s education under Under Office of the Basic Education in
the amount of 209 persons by the calculate approximately the size’s example from Krejcie and Morgan
Methods’ that have a result in 136 persons. The procedure’s research methods are divided into 2 sections;
Section One: There are questionnaire for analyzing the emotional maturity by Department of Mental Health.
Section Two: The questionnaire that relate with resolution on the conflict of the administrator’s education by
the Thomas – Killmans theory, rational approximately 5 levels. There have the confidential whole document
in level 0.94. Then, the procedure of analyzing is designed by basic of statistic for analyzing the average of
percentage and standard deviation. Lastly, the analyzing will be done by the case study of the analyzing the
in the relation between the level’s emotional maturity and the level of the choosing resolve on the conflict of
the administrator’s education by the questionnaire ‘s Chi-square test.
The result are found the level’s Emotional Maturity of the administrator’s education under Under Office
of the Basic Education that are in the regular average. So, the resolution on the conflict of the administrator’s
education under Under Office of the Basic Education by respectively. The best popular are chosen that is the
method of compromising. Second is cooperation, avoidance and abide by. And the worst case is the method
by get over. However, in term of the relation between of the level’s Emotional Maturity and the level of the
choosing resolve on the conflict of the administrator’s education, found administrator’s education under Under
Office of the Basic Education in every level of Emotional Maturity avoid to get over, but they try to choosing
in cooperation and compromising method. Moreover, there are still found the level’s Emotional Maturity have
not relation with the avoidance method and compromising method.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Bangkok : Wattanaphanich.
[2] Surang Losamritchai. (1993). Causes of conflicts
and conflict management of Secondary school
administrators under the Department of General
Education, Bangkok. Master of Education Thesis
: Srinakharinwirot University.
[3] Chaloa Konkham. (2001). The emotional quotiet
and conflict resolution of school administrators
under lopburi provincial primary education
office. Master of Education Thesis : Thepsatri
Rajabhat University.[4] Sawittree Phanitchareon. (2005). Personality as well
as emotional intelligence and conflict management
of the Academic Department Head Teachers
in Secondary Schools under the Office of the Basic
Education Commission, Bangkok District 3. Master
of Arts Thesis : King Mongkut’s Institute of
Technology North Bangkok.
[5] Thanaporn Masakul. (2004). Relationship between
Administrators’ Emotional Maturity and Conflict
Management in Operations of subordinates.
Master of Education Thesis : Rajamangala
University of Technology Thanyaburi
[6] Juthamart Rujiratanon. (2004). A study of Conflict
Cause and Conflict Management Method of
Administrators of School 1-2 Levels under Suphanburi
Educational Service Area Office. Kanchanaburi
Rajabhat University.
[7] Rungsun Hamunt. (2003). Conflict Management of
Administrators in Primary School under the
Primary Education Office of Amphoe Nakhon
Chaisri, Nakhon Pathom Province. Master of Arts
Thesis : Silpakorn University.
[8] Supakorn Mekkhayai. (2007). The Relationship
Between Leadership Styles and Conflict
Management of Administrators in Basic
Educational School Under Kanchanaburi
Educational Service Area Office 3. Master of Arts
Thesis : Silpakorn University.
[9] Weeranut Suttaphan. (2007). Conflict Administration
on the Performance of basic Educational Institution
Administrators under the Jurisdiction of Samut
prakan Educational Service Area Office 1. Master
of Education Thesis : Rajabhat Rajanagarindra
University.[10] Putcharaporn Kullabut. (2012). Conflict
management of the educational institution
administrators, Mae Hong Son primary education
service area 1. Master of Arts Thesis : Chiang Mai
University.
[11] Issara Yothasrikun. (2013). Conflict Management
of Executives From Basic Educational Institues
under Chaiyaphum Primary Educational Service
Area Office 2. Master of Arts Thesis : Mahamakut
Buddhist University.
[12] Madea Mathong. (2013). Conflict management
of school administrators under the office of
Chachoengsao primary education service area 1.
Master of Arts Thesis : Burapa university.
