Competency of ICT School Director for Effective to Education Management 4.0 Efficiency under 21st Century
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this research were to,1) study in gcompetencies of ICT school director, and 2) developed and investigate congruence a causal model of competencies of ICT school director for effective to education management 4.0 efficiency under 21st century. The collection, first to involved synthesizing documentary and interview questionnaire with 20 directors to study to ICT competencies, second to survey by questionnaire with 550 sampling were the directors and teachers to study the levels of ICT competencies, third to investigate congruence causal of model. The study revealed that, 1) competencies of ICT school director at a “key” of five characteristics, 2) developed and investigate congruence a causal model, then a level of ICT competencies at high levels, and investigate congruence a causal model was congruence with empirical data (Chi-square/df=1.73, GFI=0.96, RMR=0.034, RMSEA=0.04). Technological leader, technology literacy, academic optimism had direct influence, while technological leadership, school climate had indirect influence on efficiency of education management 4.0 efficiency under 21st century.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
[2] Sukamart, A, Jedaman, P, and Authors. (2017). The 21st Century of Sustainable Leadership under Education Thailand 4.0 Framework. Journal of Industrial Education. 16 (2), May- August, pp. 1-7.
[3] Technology for Instruction Office. (2010). Satisfaction users of technology services. Bangkok: Agricultural cooperative assembly, Thailand. LTD.
[4] Maddux, C.D. (2002). Information technology in education: the critical lack of principled leadership. Educational Technology, 42 (3), pp. 41-50.
[5] Office of the Education Council, Ministry of
Education. (2016). Driven to education reform.
Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Education. The
office, p. 12.
[6] Office of the Education Council, Ministry of
Education. (2018).Policies and strategies for
educational development. Bangkok,Thailand:
Ministry of Education. The office, p. 4.
[7] Keeves, J. P. (1997). Educational research, and methodology, and measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
[8] Betty, T. and Herron, A. (2004). School Climate and Learning. Best Practices Brief, 31, p. 1-10.
[9] Bush, T. (2000). Leadership and Strategic
Management in Education. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
[10] McGuigan, L.(2005). The Role of Enabling
Bureaucracy and Academic Optimism in
Academic Achievement Growth. Doctoral
Dissertation, School of the Ohio State
University.
