The Evaluation Model of Learning Distance Education Through Information Technology Schools Under the Officeof the Basic Education Commission
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research the purpose of this study was to develop a model for the evaluation of distance education through information technology (DLIT) of schools under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The research was carried out by research and development process. Research Phase 4 consists of Phase.; (1), Study of Concepts, Principles of Educational Management, and Assessment of Distance Education through Information Technology. (DLIT) under the Office of the Basic Education Commission and interviews with those involved in distance education through information technology. (DLIT) under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Basic Education Commission Phase.; (2) Establish a model for evaluation of distance education through information technology. (DLIT) under the Office of the Basic Education Commission The data from Section 1 was drafted and the experts checked the suitability and feasibility of the draft assessment form. Using Multi - attribute consensus techniques. 10 experts prepared the assessment manual. Bring 10 expert guides to check the appropriateness, coverage and clarity of the evaluation manual. First, use the evaluation form. To study the scores obtained from award-winning schools in distance education through information technology. (DLIT) with unqualified schools selected from the selected sample and Stage 4 evaluates the evaluation form. The samples used in the evaluation form. The instruments used in this study were questionnaires, assessment forms and observation forms used for data analysis. The basic statistics were percentage, mean and standard deviation. The hypothesis tests were The Mann-Whitney U Test
The research found that ;(1) An evaluation model of distance education through information technology (DLIT). under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. The researcher has developed 5 elements. Include, The components of the support and management are 3 indicators, The component of the teacher characteristics are 3 indicators, The component of technology are 3 indicators, The component of evaluation are 3 indicators, The component of characteristics of the students are 3 Indicator.;(2) An evaluation model of distance education through information technology (DLIT). developed by the researcher. Have It is possible to distinguish thegroup of award-winning schools from unsuccessful school group.; (3) An Evaluation model of distance education through information technology (DLIT). developed by the researcher. There is a standard of usefulness. Feasibility, appropriateness, and accuracy In every level.;(4) Trial results Evaluation model of distance education through information technology (DLIT).
revealed that the school group received the award. The overall rating was higher than the non-awarding school group. At the .01 level of significance
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Sirichai Kanjanawasee. (2543). การประเมินการสอนระดับอุดมศึกษา. Bangkok : ทบวงมหาวิทยาลัย
Moursund J.P. (1973). Evaluation : An Introduction to Research Design. California : Brook & Cole.
Samran Mejang. (2558). การประเมินโครงการทางการศึกษา : ทฤษฎีและปฏิบัติ. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Press
Rattana Buosonte. (2013). CIPP and CIPPIEST Evaluation Models : Mistaken and Precise Concepts of Applications. Veridian E-Journal. Silpakorn University.Silpakorn University
Sirichai Kanjanawasee. (2554). Evaluation Theory.. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Press
Nevo, David. (1983).“The Conceptualization of education : An Analytical review of the literature,” Review of Education Research. 53 : 117-128.
Sirichai Kanjanawasee. (2552). Evaluation Theory Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Press
Stufflebeam, Daniel L. and Shinkfield, Anthony J. (1990). Systematic Evaluation. Boston : Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
Johnstone, J.N. (1981). Indicator of Education Systems. London : The Anchor Press.
เยาวดีรางชัยกุล วิบูลย์ศรี. (2556). การประเมินโครงการ แนวคิดและแนวปฏิบัติ. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 8. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Press
Bardo, W. John and John J. Hartman. (1982). Urban Sociology : A Systematic Introduction. U.S.A. : F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
Boonchom Sri Sa-at. (2013) .Preliminary research.(9th Edition) ,Bangkok : Suviriyasarn.
