An Curriculum Evaluation on Doctor of Philosophy Program in Educational Research and Evaluation, RajabhatMahasarakham University
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research were to study the curriculum evaluation on Doctor of Philosophy Program in Educational Research and Evaluation by using the evaluation method ; the CIPPIETSModel.There sample of this research were 8 administrators and courseinstructors, 41 students, 15philosophy and 14 educates’ employers. The research instruments included the questionnaire and interview form. The collect data were analyzed by using percentage (%), mean ( X ), standard deviation (S.D.) and content analysis.
The purpose of this research were to study the curriculum evaluation on Doctor of Philosophy Program in Educational Research and Evaluation by using the evaluation method ; the CIPPIETS Model.There sample of this research were 8 administrators and course instructors, 41 students, 15 philosophy and 14 educates’ employers. The research instruments included the questionnaire and interview form. The collect data were analyzed by using percentage (%), mean ( X ), standard deviation (S.D.) and content analysis.
The results of the study were as follows :1)There are opinions that overview of the assessment were administrators and course instructors, students, philosophy and educates’ employers are appropriate at the highest level. 2)The context of curriculum showed that appropriate in high leveland the curriculum should be consistent with the educational needs of society and keep up with changes in innovation and technology.3) The input factors of curriculum found that the overall were in high level and there should be more modern English textbooks and there is a meeting room to exchange knowledge and search for students. 4) The process factors of curriculum found that the overall were in high level and should adjust the foundation and enhance knowledge for students who do not graduate directly in the field of research and evaluation. 5) The product factors of curriculum found that the overall were in highest level and should bring knowledge and understanding in research and evaluation of education to develop knowledge and apply to work. 6) The impact factors of curriculum found that the overall were in highest level and should enhance confidence in the knowledge of research and evaluation of education Integrated knowledge to work and give advice to other people effectively.7) The effectiveness factors of curriculum found that the overall were in highest level and should strengthen to have confidence in the knowledge Integration in work and Providing effective advice to other people. 8) The sustainability factors of curriculum found that the overall were in highest level. 9) The Transportability factors of curriculum found that the overall each item were in highest level and there should be public relations courses for those involved diverse and comprehensive.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Office of the Higher Education Commission,Ministry of Education. (2008). Higher education plan framework,15 years long term,No. 2 (2008-2022).Bangkok : Printing of Chulalongkorn University.
Ministry of Education.(1999). Act National Education, 1999. Bangkok : KurusapaPrinting.
Faculty of Education, RajabhatMahaSarakham University.(2013). Doctor of Philosophy Program, Department of Educational Research and Evaluation (Course Update,2013). Maha Sarakham : MahaSarakham Rajabhat UniversityPublishing House.
Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education.(2005). The national educational standards. Bang
Mariam Ninpun. (2011). Doctor of Philosophy Program AssessmentIn Curriculum and Instruction (Course Improvement, 2013). Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University.
Stufflebeam and Shinkfield. (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models and Applications. John Wiley and Son, Ine.
Boonchom Sri Sa-at.(2013). Preliminary research.(9th Edition), Bangkok : Suviriyasarn.
Chavalit Chu Kampaeng. (2016). Curriculum and research development Concepts and processe.(1th Edition). Bangkok : Printing of Chulalongkorn University.
Saman Ekapim. (2017). Curriculum development :theory to practice design and development.(1th Edition). MahaSarakham : Printing ofTukkasira.
Oliva, Peter F. (2009). Development the Curriculum.3rd ed. New York : Harper Collins.
MahshidAbdi Shahshahaniet.,al. (2015).The Evaluation of Reproductive Health PhD Program in Iran : A CIPP Model Approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(25).Academic World Education and Research Center.
Prayong Huttaprom. (2011). Course process. (1st edition). Mahasarakham : Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Press
Maream Nillapun.(2012). The Curriculum Evaluation on Doctor of Philosophy Program in Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University.
Rattanasiri Khemarat. (2015). The Evaluation of Master of Education Program in Teaching English as a Global Language. Faculty of Educational.Burapha University.
Chaiwat Sutthirat.(2013). Curriculum Development : Theory into practice.V-Print Company Limited. Bangkok.
Taba, Hilda. (1962). Curriculum Development : Theory and Practice. Har-court Brace and World,New York.
Kornphatsorn Indaramrung. (2015). The evaluation of bachelor of education program in Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University.Silpakorn University
Azadeh Rooholaminiet.,al. (2017). Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(4)
Boonliang Toomthong. (2014). Curriculum Development. Surin Rajabhat University Press.
Rattana Buosonte. (2013). CIPP and CIPPIEST Evaluation Models : Mistaken and Precise Concepts of Applications. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University.Silpakorn University
Porntip Chaisoet.,al.(2016). Curriculum Evaluation and Development of Doctor of Education Program in Educational Research and development : Faculty of Educational,KasetsartUniversity. Dusit Thani College Journal.
Jati Aurum Asfaroha, Dadan Rosanaa and Supahara. (2017). International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Sunee Phupun. (2003). Basic concepts of curriculum development and Creation. Chiang Mai : The Knowledge Center.
Chanakan Harkhanet.,al. (2015). Evaluation of the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 of the schools under local administration in Prachuap kirikhan Province. The 6th International Conference of suan Sunandha Rajaphat University.
