A Study on the Hidden Curriculum in Classroom Atmosphere of the Basic Education Level In the Teaching Profession Development Network Schools of Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research aimed to: 1) study perceptions of phenomena of teachers and students in classroom
atmosphere; 2) study teachers’ expectations and students’ perception of teachers’ expectations from
phenomena in classroom atmosphere; and, 3) study hidden curriculums from phenomena in classroom
atmosphere. The key informants were teachers and students of the basic education level in the teaching profession
development network schools of Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University. The number of the key informants
was determined according to W.G. Cochran’s formula for infinite population, and Taro Yamane’s method,
and the key informants were chosen through purposive sampling. The research was carried out in 2 phases.
Phase 1 dealt with the study on phenomena, teachers’ expectations, and students’ perceptions from the
phenomena found in classroom atmosphere; and Phase 2 dealt with the study on teaches’ expectations,
students’ perceptions of the teachers’ expectations, and the hidden curriculums in the classroom atmosphere.
The research instruments comprised: 1) a form for learning organization plan analysis, 2) an interview form
for the teachers, 3) a teaching observation form, 4) a questionnaire for the teachers, and 5) a questionnaire
for the students. The analysis of data employed the descriptive statistics of frequency and percentage.The
results revealed the following :
1. The study on perceptions of phenomena in classroom atmosphere of teachers and students included
89 items of phenomena in the classroom atmosphere and they can be categorized as follows: 1) instructional
activities, having 17 items, 2) measurement and evaluation, having 22 items, 3) environment, media and learning
resources, having 11 items, 4) pattern of action, having 23 items, and 5) symbolic language, having 16
items, there were 13 items of the phenomena in classroom atmosphere that were perceived by 80 percent
or more of the teachers and students. The top 3 of these phenomena were: dressed modestly; be punctual
in teaching; and using “teacher” to refer to his or her own self.
2. The study of teachers’ expectations and students’ perceptions of the teachers’ expectations
from the phenomena in classroom atmosphere on 5 aspects, 267 items altogether. It was found that the
top 10 teachers’ expectations from the phenomena in classroom atmosphere were as follows: the 1st
ranking expectation was the expectation of having a standard evaluation, from the phenomenon of
setting the evaluation criteria, and the 10th ranking expectation was the expectation of motivating
students to submit their assignments in time, from the phenomenon of not accepting overdue assignments.
Meanwhile, the students’ perceptions of the top 10 of the teachers’ expectations from the phenomena
in classroom atmosphere revealed the 1st perception was perceiving that the students had learned the
right content and points, from the phenomenon of lecturing; and the 10th perception was perceiving that
the purpose was to evaluate the basic knowledge of the students, from the phenomenon of pretesting.
3. In the study on the hidden curriculums which were perceived by the students or the students had
learned from the phenomena in the classroom atmosphere which were different from the teachers’ expectations,
from the phenomena on 5 aspects, 178 items altogether, positive hidden curriculums and negative hidden
curriculums were found in the top 10 curriculums. To elaborate this, the 1st positive hidden curriculum was
learning how to work systematically, which was learning resulting from the phenomenon of informing about
the objectives of teaching, and the 10th positive hidden curriculum was learning the characteristic of being
eager to know, which was learning from the phenomenon of pretesting. Meanwhile, the 1st negative hidden
curriculum was learning to learn by receiving knowledge, from the phenomenon of lecturing; and the 10th
negative hidden curriculum was learning the negative attitude toward the subject being learned, which was
learning from the phenomenon of teaching more content as described by the curriculum.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Hydrologic Modeling : Statistical Methods and
Applications. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs New
Jersey, p.27
[2] Levine, & Arthur. (1978). Handbook on
Undergraduate Curriculum. 1st ed. A Report for the
Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher
Education. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass, 526.
[3] Longstreet, W.S. & Shane, H.G. (1993). Curriculum
for a new millennium. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
[4] Portelli. (1993). Exposing the Hidden Curriculum.
The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(4)
September, 343-358.
[5] Glatthorn, Allan A. (1999). Curriculum alignment
revisited. Journal of Curriculum Supervision, 15(1),
26-34.
[6] Anderson, T. (2001). The hidden curriculum in
distance education : an updated view. Change,
33(6), Nov./Dec, 28-35.
[7] Ballentine, Jeanne H. , & Spade, J. Z. (2001). School
and Society : A Sociological Approach to Education
: The Wadsworth Sociology Reader Series.
Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
[8] Myles., & Brenda Smith. (2001) . Understanding the
hidden curriculum: an essential social skill for
children and youth with Asperger syndrome.
Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(5), May,
279-86.
[9] Oliva, P.F. (2001). Developing the Curriculm. Fifth
Edition. The Lehigh Press.
[10] Schugurensky., & Daniel. (2002). The eight
curricula of multicultural citizenship education.
Multicultural Education, 10(1), 2-6.
[11] Chanita Rakpollamueang. (1991). Educational
Foundation : Social Principle and Concepts.
Department of Educational Foundation, Faculty of
Education : Chulalongkorn University.
[12] Thawatchai Chaijirachayakul. (1997). “Unit 1 :
Principles and Trends of Curriculum Development.”
Subjects Set of Curriculum Development and
Teaching Methodology : Sukhothai Thammathirat
Open University
[13] Posner GJ. (1992). Analyzing the curriculum. New
York : McGraw-Hill. : p.11
[14] Tanner & Tanner. (1995). “Curriculum
Development ;Theory into Practice,” Third Edition.
Prentice-Hall,Inc. New Jersey , America.
[15] Poosit Boontongtherng. (2011). Learning and
Teaching Development. Program in Curriculum
and Instruction : Faculty of Education : Rajabhat
Mahasarakham University.
[16] Romine, Stephen. (2001). “Student and Faculty
Perceptions of an Effective University Instructional
Climates.” The Journal of Education Research.
[17] Tisana Khammani. (2010). Teaching Science :
Knowledge for Management the Effective
Learning Process. Bangkok : Center for Textbooks
and Academic Documents, Faculty of Education
: Chulalongkorn University.
[18] Chiensri Vividhasiri. (1984). Adult Learning
Psychology. Bangkok : Faculty of Education :
Srinakharinwirot University.
[19] Phrapromkunaporn (P.O. Payutto). (2011).
Dictionary of Buddhist Studies : Subjects Set
Volume. Bangkok : Sahathammikka Printing.
[20] Kitiyawadee Bunsue and Others. (1997). Happily
Learning Theories. Bangkok : Office of the National
Education Commission : Ministry of Interior.
[21] Charles, Randall. et al. (1987). How to Evaluate
Progress in Problem Solving. Resto, Virginia :
The National Council of Mathematics.
[22] Manoon Siwarom. (1989). A construction of the
equation predicting mathematics learning
achievement of mathayom suksa five students
by their mathematics scholastics aptitude, attitude
towards mathematics and anxiety. Master of
Education Thesis : Chulalongkorn University.
[23] Prasit Chansiri . (1990). A study of Anxiety in
mathematics and Mathematics Learning
Achievement of Mathayom 1 students in
Mahasarakham Province. Master of Education
Thesis : Mahasarakham University.
[24] Suppavan Tanpoonkiat. (1991). A Relationship
Between Mathematics Anxiety,Intelligence And
Mathematics Learning Achievement Ofmathayom
Suksa Four Students, Bangkok Metropolis. Master
of Education Thesis : Chulalongkorn University.
[25] Patchara Thatsanawijittrawong. (1998). A study
on the relationship between some factors and
mathematical learning. Master of Education
Thesis : Mahasarakham University.
[26] Pensuda Junton. (1998). An Interaction of Learning
Styles and Mathematics Anxiety on Mathemtics
Learning Achievement of Mathayom Suksa Three
Students. Master of Education Thesis : Chulalongkorn
University.
[27] Anek Techasuk. (1998). Relationship between
Attitude toward Mathematics, Attitude towards
teachers, Interest in mathematics, Anxiety in
mathematics, Achievement Motivation, Self
Discipline and and Mathematics Learning
Achievement of Mathayom 2 students in Kalasin
province. Master of Education Thesis : Mahasarakham
University.
[28] Kern, P.D. (1972). A study of the relationship among
anxiety, self-esteem and achievement.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 4551-A.
[29] Kirschenbaum, D. & Karoly, P. (1977). When
self- regulation fails : Tests of some preliminary
[30] Ridgeway, I.C. (1981). Elements of cognitive style,
Mathematics anxiety and sex as they relate to
achievement of high school chemistry students.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 42,161-A.
[31] Strawderman, V.W. (1986). A description of
Mathematics anxiety using an intergrative model.
Dissertation Abstracts International. 47, 457-A.
[32] Coates, J.D. (1998). Mathematics anxiety and
its relationship to students’ Percieved teacher
and parent attitudes toward Mathematics.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, June,
4590-A.
[33] Aiken, L. R. (1979). Attitudes toward mathematics
and science in Iranian middle schools. School
Science and Mathematics. p. 229-234.
[34] Tomsic, L.J. (1990). The Relationship among Goal
Accomplishment Style of Upper Elementary Gifted
Students, Attitude toward Mathematics, Higher
Thinking Skills and Mathematics Achievement.
Dissertation Abstracts International, 17(4), 20-41.
[35] Ma, X. (1997). Reciprocal Relationship between
Attitude toward Mathematics and Achievement
in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Research.
4(90),221-229.
[36] Amnuay Chainam. (1994). The Relationship
between Learning support of Parents, Attitude
towards Mathematics, Learning Habits and
Attitudes and Mathematics Learning Achievement
of Mathayom 3 students. Master of Education
Thesis : Chiang Mai University.
[37] Siriwan Promchote. (1999). Factors influencing
mathematics learning achievement of Mathayom 1
students in School of Educational Opportunity
Expansion, Srisaket Province. Master of Education
Thesis : Srinakharinwirot University.
[38] Corbo, Nicholas J. (1984). Mathematics Attitude
and Achievement in Grads Five Through Seven
in South Central Pensylvania. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 45(6), 1672-A-1673-A.
[39] Bessant, K.C. (1995). Factors associated
with types of Mathematics anxiety in colledge
students. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 26(1995),327-345.
[40] Poosit Boontongtherng. (2006). “Control the
Influence of the Hidden Curriculum : The Way to
Enhance the Learning of Mathematics based on
Quality Criteria”. Journal of Education Studies,
4(Special Issue) February, 73-85.
[41] Silberman, C.E. (1970). Crisis in the Classroom.
New York : Random House. p.9
[42] Barz, Jonathan M. (2001). Coach Knight and the
hidden curriculum. Lutheran Education, 136 (4),
Summer, 244-6.