The Development of Learning Management by UsingScientific Argumentation in Physics for Mathayomsuksa 4 Students
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study were ; 1) To study the status of physics learning management.2) To develop
physics instructional model using the scientific argumentation for Mathayomsuksa 4 students.The samples were
385 grade 10 students and 110 teachers of Secondary education service area office 28 by multi-stage sampling.
The research instruments included 1) the questionnaires for physics teacher’s opinions on the state of physics
learning management. 2) the questionnaires for Mathayomsuksa 4 student’s opinions on the state of physics
learning management. 3) the evaluation for suitable of learning management by using scientific argumentation
in physics.Analyze data with mean and standard deviation. The research findings were as follows :
1. State of learning management in physics for Mathayomsuksa 4 students and teachers of secondary
education service area office were moderate level in learning process and instructional media.
2. The learning management by using scientific argumentation in physics consisted of 4 components ;
1) principle and basic concepts 2) instructional purposes 3) learning process,there were 5 steps ; (1)
creating attention (2) identify the point (3) showing reasons and evidences (4) construct the argumentation (5)
reflection.4) evaluation. The evaluation for suitable of learning management by using scientific argumentation
in physics was high level.
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
Curriculum 2008 : The Content and Standards of
Science Learning. Bangkok : Organization of
Transfer Products and Packging.
[2] National Institute of Educational Testing Service
(Public Organization). (2018). O-NET Exam Results.
may 30,2018web site:http://www.niets.or.th/th/
catalog/view/2989
[3] Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and
Technology.(2015). Summary of PISA 2015 Results.
may 30,2018 web site :http://pisathailand.ipst.
ac.th/pisa/reports/pisa2015summaryreport
[4] Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and
Technology.(2018). Teaching physics Let the
students know. may 30,2018 web site :http://
physics.ipst.ac.th/?p=3731
[5] Osborne, Jonathan.(2007). Science Education for the
Twenty First Century. Eurasia Journal of
Mathematics, Science & Technology Education.
3(3),173-184.
[6] Dawson,Vaille Maree; & Venville, Grady.(2010).
Teaching Strategies for Developing Students’
Argumentation Skills About Socioscientific Issues
in High School Genetics. Res Sci Educ, 40,133-148.
[7] Simon, Shirley. (2011). Argumentation. In How
Science Works : Exploring Effective Pedagogy
and Practice. Edited by Toplis, Rob. New York,
USA : Routledge.
[8] Sampson, Victor; Grooms, Jonathon ; & Walker, Joi
Phelps. (2010). Argument-Drive Inquiry as a Way
to Help Students Learn How to Participate in
Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written
Arguments : An Exploratory Study. Science
Education, 95, 217-257.
[9] Evagorou, Maria; & Osborne, Jonathan. (2013).
Exploring Young Students’ Collaborative
Argumentation with in a Socioscientific Issue.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2),
209-237.
[10] Llewellyn,Douglas; & Rajesh, Hema. (2011).
Fostering Argumentation Skills: Doing What Real
Scientists Really Do. Science Scope, 35(1), 22-28.
[11] Somsuk, Prapa. (2015). Development of the 2I3C
PhysicsInstructionalModel Using Scientific
Argumentationfor Upper Secondary School
Students, .Doctor of Education Thesis. Bangkok :
Srinakharinwirot University.
[12] Chantraukrit,Pornthep. (2013). Development of
an Instructional Model by Integrating the
Argument-Driven Inquiry Model and Model-Based
Learning Approach to Promote Scientific Literacy
Competencies and Rationality of Lower Secondary
School Students. Doctor of Education Thesis.
Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University.
[13] Khemmani, Tisana. (2010). Teaching Science.
Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.
[14] Joyce,B., and Weil, M.(1992). Models of teaching.
Needham Heights, MA Allyn and Bacon.
[15]Arends.(1997). Classroom Instruction and
Management. New York : McGraw-Hill.
[16] Anderson. (2003). Teaching Science as Inquiry.
Indiana : Indiana University.
[17] Juntasen,Chunchai. (2015). The Development of
Science Learning Model for Promotion High
School Students’ Critical Thinking. Doctorof
Education Thesis. Mahasarakham : Mahasarakham
University.
