Leadership Development Model Based on good Governance of the District Administrative Office Mahasarakham Province.
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study the factors that influence the style of leadership based on good governance of the District Administrative Office. To establish and verify a form of leadership by the good governance of the District Administrative Office. Mahasarakham province The study in Maha Sarakham how to perform Phase 1 studies for the leadership of the principles of good governance Tambon Administration Organization. Phase two research papers to study the factors that affect the leadership of the principles of good governance Tambon Administration Organization. Mahasarakham province The sample is representative of the personnel working in the organization in the district. Maha Sarakham number 95 of the sampling stratum (Stratified Random Sampling), then perform random simplified (Simple random sampling), which has a number of 380 people from the calculation of the formula Taro Yamane (Taro Yamane). data were collected using scales. Data were analyzed by a computer program. The statistics used to test the hypothesis that the multiple regression line (Multiple Linear Regression) analysis using a variable into the equation all (Enter Method) The level of statistical significance that. 05 (Level of Significent). and phase 3 will create a leadership development based on good governance of the District administrative Office. Mahasarakham province And validate the model. By the way, check out the experts. (Connoisseurship) 20 analyzes the statistical average.
The research results were found as follows;
- the factors that affect the leadership of the principles of good governance Tambon Administration Organization. Maha Sarakham factors include communications (.426) personality factors (0.296) factors responsible (0.172) factor of the decision (-0.126) Such factors. Influencing Leadership principles of good governance Tambon Administration Organization. Mahasarakham province Significant at the .05 level. The correlation coefficient equal to 0.781 multiple independent variables can explain all of the variance of the dependent variable was 61.00 percent.
- Leadership model developed by the good governance of the District Administrative Office. Skip include developing a communications composed of clear communication. Act appropriately Commented gentle observe and learn about the other person. And Good Personality development consists of adapting to society. The dress Listen to the opinions of others. Always develop your skills There is a strong draft Development initiative And have the skills to perform. Responsibilities include the development of quality jobs. The track is always The responsible organization Corporate Social Responsibility Self-responsibility And admit mistakes The decision to include the development decisions. A decision Knowing the analysis of alternatives Taking into account the public interest And planning decisions
Article Details
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
[2] Office of the Government Development Board in cooperation with the Foundation for Law Research Institute. (2003).Strategic Plan for Thai Official Development ; Year 2003 –2007. Bangkok:Office of the Government Development Board in cooperation with the Foundation for Law Research Institute.
[3] Chalard Kharmchaung(1999). Local political development; Case study of Sub-district Administrative Organization, Jungharn District, Rio-et Province”Master of ArtThesis, Mahasarakham University.
[4] Department of the Interior (2004). The Child and Youth Development Standards.Bangkok:Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand.
[5] Adul Wiriyawetchakul.(2010).Quality Indicator Index of Graduate Student in Higher Education. 2nd ed.Bangkok:Graduate School, Mahidol University.
[6] Phaithoon Sinlarat. (2010). Teaching Strategies According to the Standard Framework of Higher Education..Bangkok:Chulalongkorn University.
[7] Janya Siwanon. (2005).The teachingDocument of Social Psychology. Bangkok:Department of Psychology ;Kasetsart University.
[8] Local Office of MahaSarakham. (2015). Annual Report2015. MahaSarakham : MahaSarakham Provincial Administrative Organization.
[9] Taro Yamane. (1973). Statistics An Introductory Analysis. New York : Harper & Row.
[10] Rungsan Singhalert. (2008). Social Research Methodology. MahaSarakham : RajabhatMahaSarakham University.
[11] Cronbach, lee Joseph. (1970).Essentials of Psychological Testing.New York : Harper and Row.
[12] Soawalak Kosolkittiamporn (2014).“Development of Effective Administrative Competencies of Tambon Administration Executive in MahaSarakham Province,” Chopayom Journal, 25 (2) : 109 – 124.
[13] Siriporn Phongsrirot. (1997).Organization and Management.7th ed. Bangkok:Technical Partnership Ltd.
[14] Noppongs Bunyajitradulya. (1997). Applying the Good Governance in the Sub-district administrative Organization according to People’s Opinion in Chiangmai Province.Master of Public Administration Thesis, Chiang Mai University.
[15] Weera Phoorahong. (2007).Desirable Characteristics of the Mayor on the Voters' Attitude : Case Study of Bangmueang Municipalities, Muang District, SamutPrakarn Province.Master of Public Administration Thesis, Burapha University.
[16] Phutcharin Thidkul. (2012).Public’s Opinion towards Leadership of Community Committees in MueangKalasin Municipality, Kalasin Province. Master of Public Administration ThesisRajabhatMahaSarakham University.
[17] Kittima Preedeedilok. (1994). Education Philosophy.2nd ed. Bangkok :Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Srinakharinwirot University.
[18] Daft.. (2011).The Leadership Experience. 3rded. Canada : Thomson Corporation.Inc.
[19] Yukl. (1994). Leadership in Organization. New Jersey : Prentice - Hall.
[20] Somsak Promdue. (2016).“Policy innovation for Public serviceofSub-district Administration OrganizationIn the Middle East region.,” Journal of Social Science, 9 (2) : 9 – 24.
[21] Thawatchai Phong-uan. (2011).Public opinion on Leadership Features of President of Wongluang Sud-District Administrative Organization, Phopisai District, Nongkhai Province.Master of Public Administration Independent Study, RajabhatMahaSarakham University.
[22] Phutcharin Thidkul. (2012).Public’s Opinion towards Leadership of Community Committees in MueangKalasin Municipality, Kalasin Province. Master of Public Administration ThesisRajabhatMahaSarakham University.
[23] Weerawat Punnitamai. (2001).Knowledge Development.Bangkok :TheTheeraFortress Literary.
[24] Somphis Wichayachien. (1999).Head is not Tail.Bangkok:Nammee Book.
[25] Kawee Wongphud. (1999).Techniques for Building theLeadership.10th ed. Bangkok :PlewAksorn.
[26] Bateman. (1993). “Proactive behavior: Meaning, impact, recommendations,”Business Horizons. 42(3), 63–70.
[27] Sukhummarn Prayuknitiwat. (2007). Desirable leadership in View ofCustomer Relationship Officer of Capital City of TOT Public Company Limited.Master of Business Thesis,ThonburiRajabhat University.
