King Bhumibol’s Charisma : The powerful sword to chop down the deadlock of Thai politics
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article titled “King Bhumibol’s Charisma : The powerful sword to chop down the deadlock of Thai politics” has a main purpose to explain the rapidly organizational culture change in court’s administration, especially in behavior and attitude changing from passive mind to active one in order to solve the crucial political problem. The style of changing is not activated by an outside surrounding of the court despite the very serious situation, but initiated by an extraordinary inside factor which is informal structure with powerful influence. This most special factor is the king who is the ruling elite of the organization. The king with the great charisma is the cultural factor inside the court as powerful cultural agent, not seen as the outside one. However, the king is not formally positioned in the hierarchical structure of the court, but he is very powerful to change the practice style of the court suddenly in order to solve the crucial political problem. This issue is so very fascinating to study in organization theory, especially in the area of organizational culture.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
ไทยรัฐ. (2549). เวปไซด์: http://www.thairath.co.th/online.php?section=newsthairathonline&content =3839
ประชาไท. (2549). เวปไซด์: http://www.prachatai.com/05web/th/home/page2.php?mod=mod_ptcms&ID=4297&Key=HilightNews
มติชน. (2 มิถุนายน 2549).
ศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.supremecourt.or.th/webportal/supremecourt/content.php?content=component/content/view.php&id=82
ศาลปกครอง. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.admincourt.go.th/Amc_tha.html
ศาลยุติธรรม. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.coj.go.th/coj2008/index.php
ศาลยุติธรรม. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.coj.go.th/coj2008/vision-mission.php
ศาลยุติธรรม. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.coj.go.th/judiciary.php
ศาลยุติธรรม. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.coj.go.th/judi-section/judi-section-judiciary.php
สภาผู้แทนราษฎร. (2549). เวปไซด์: http://www.parliament.go.th/news/news_detail.php?prid=2817
สำนักประธานศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.judiciary.go.th/appealc/info.php?info=about
สำนักประธานศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.judiciary.go.th/crimtbc/index.htm
สำนักประธานศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.judiciary.go.th/ojc/duty_kt.html
สำนักประธานศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.judiciary.go.th/org.php
สำนักประธานศาลฎีกา. (2551). เวปไซด์: http://www.judiciary.go.th/policy.php
Hatch, M.J. and Cunliffe. (2006). Organizational Theory : Modern, Symbolic, and Postmodern Perspectives. London : Oxford University Press.
Katz, Daniel and Kahn, Robert. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York : John Wiley & Sons.
Peters, Thomas J. and Waterman, H. Jr. Robert. (1982). In Search of Excellence : Lessons from America’s Best Run Companies. New York : Harper&Row.
Thompson, James D. (1967). Organization in Action : Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill