The Study of Problems and Guidelines for Administrative Management of Anti-Corruption Education of Schools under the Kalasin Primary Education Office Area 3

Abstract

This research is mixed methods research with 2 phases of research. Phase 1 was to study problems in for the administrative management of Anti-Corruption Education. The research populations were 796 people including administrators, teachers, chairman of the commission of basic educational school, and students. The research instrument was the questionnaires with 5-level rating scale, which had discrimination between 0.63-0.86. The reliability of the questionnaires was 0.98. The statistics used for the data analysis were mean and standard deviation. Phase two was to study the guidelines for the administrative management of Anti-Corruption Education. The informants were 9 persons. The instrument used for gathering information was the structured interview. The data analysis was completed by content analysis.
The results of the study were as follows: 1) The overall problems in the administrative management of Anti-Corruption Education of Schools under the Kalasin Primary Education Office Area 3 were at the high level (μ=3.57, σ=0.66). The aspect of problems with an average above all averages were 1.1) school readiness preparation was at the high level (μ=3.93, σ=0.86) 1.2) Supervision, following up and evaluation was at the high level (μ=3.81, σ=0.80) 1.3) Summarizing the results of Anti-Corruption Education administration was at the high level (μ=3.96, σ =0.90) and 1.4) improving and development of educational management Anti-Corruption Education. was at the high level (μ=3.99, σ=0.91) 2) Guidelines for the administrative management of Anti-Corruption Education of Schools under the Kalasin Primary Education Office Area 3 2.1) School readiness preparation 1) appointment of the operating committee 2) Meeting teachers and stakeholders 3) Apply the anti-corruption education to adapt according to the context of the school institution. 2.2) Supervision, following up and evaluation 1) Supervise, follow up and evaluation Anti-corruption education courses both internally and externally. 2) Plan supervision step by step and a clear supervision calendar. 3) Use a variety of appropriate follow up and evaluation methods and evaluate the results according to actual conditions. 4) Use the evaluation results and recommendations from the supervision to improve and develop the management of the Anti-corruption education 2.3) Summarizing the results of Anti-Corruption Education administration 1) Preparation of up-to-date documentation 2) Collecting operational data for analysis, synthesis, and evaluation in order to systematically and continuously report results for reflect to actual conditions. 3) Report the results of the educational institutions to the Education Office Area and public relations. 2.4) Improving and development of educational management Anti-Corruption Education. 1) Study the problem condition Plan to improve and develop the Anti-corruption education 2) Gather information, analyze, summarize the results of operations to analyze and find ways to develop and improve. 3) Stakeholders brainstorm solutions using a collaborative approach for improve and develop the Anti-corruption education to be good quality.