Muslim Countries in Asean and Thailand: Perceptions and Understandings of Saudi Arabia Through Contemporary Political, Economic, Social, and Cultural Relations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 has intensified the Kingdom’s engagement with Asia, yet research seldom compares its perceptions of individual ASEAN partners.This comparative case study analyses Saudi perceptions of Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, and Thailand during 2014–2024 by triangulating 420 policy documents, 5,130 media headlines, and ten elite interviews. Guided by the Tower Framework—integrating constructivism, international political economy, and geopolitics—the study operationalises a Hybrid-Power Metric (HPM) composed of Identity Capital (Iz), Foreign Direct Investment flows (Fz, measured in USD values), and Media Sentiment (Mz). Identity Capital is quantitatively measured through normalized Hajj quota allocations relative to Muslim population size, frequency of positive religious-identity references in Saudi official discourse, and symbolic status indicators such as OIC coordination and high-level religious diplomacy.
The findings reveal distinct perceptual profiles: Indonesia as a religious–political ally; Malaysia as a progressive economic–religious partner; Brunei as a stable ideological twin; and Thailand as a re-emerging economic gateway following the 2022 rapprochement.By demonstrating how religious identity is strategically instrumentalised to enable geoeconomic outcomes, this article advances constructivist theory and offers policy-relevant insights for strengthening GCC–ASEAN cooperation in a post-oil era.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Every article published in the Romphruek Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences is the opinion and point of view of the authors. Thery're not the viewpoint of Krirk University or the editored department. Any part or all of the articles for pablication must be clearly cited.
References
Adler, E. (2013). Constructivism in international relations: Sources, contributions, and debates. In W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse, & B. A. Simmons (Eds.), Handbook of international relations (2nd ed.) Sage.
Dorsey, J. M. (2017, March 16). Saudi Arabia’s religious soft power: Neither black nor white (RSIS Commentary No. 052). S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. https://www.google.com/search?q=https://www.rsis.edu.sg/rsis-publication/rsis/co17052-saudi-arabias-religious-soft-power-neither-black-nor-white/
Karasik, T. (2017, March 7). What King Salman’s Brunei visit means for Saudi–Brunei relations. Fair Observer. https://www.fairobserver.com/
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Saudi Vision 2030. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/
Reuters. (2022, January 26). Saudi Arabia and Thailand restore ties after 1989 “Blue Diamond” rift. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/saudi-arabia-thailand-restore-full-diplomatic-ties-thai-govt-2022-01-25/
Sahmad, P. [Paisal Sahmad]. (2023, July 13). Saudi Arabia signals Pivot to Asia: Southeast Asian diplomacy with Thailand and ASEAN [ซาอุดีอาระเบียส่งสัญญาณ Pivot to Asia: การทูตเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้กับไทยและอาเซียน]. East Asia Watch Institute. https://www.eastasiawatch.in.th/th/archives/11539
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics.
International Organization, 46(2), 391–425.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.