AN EVALUATION OF THE MODEL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND ENHANCING THE QUALITY OF THE FIX IT CENTER THAILAND 4.0 OF LOEI VOCATIONAL COLLEGE

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the project of model development and enhance the quality of Fix It Center Thailand 4.0 of Loei Vocational College. The method of thesis was systematic assessment that consisted of 1) the evaluation of the input 2) the evaluation of process factors and 3) the evaluation of the output factors. The data were collected by using questionnaires and interview forms. The sample consisted of 424 informants: 19 persons including administrators, teacher and office staff, 100 students, 300 project participants and 5 community technicians. The qualitative data group were taken from 11 informants including administrators, teachers, office staff and community technicians derived by purposive sampling. The quantitative data were analyzed by mean, S.D. while the qualitative data were by content analysis.

              The research findings were as follows : 1) 1) The evaluation level was at a high level (  = 4.34, S = 0.30),and passed all assessment criteria. The aspect with the highest average value was budget and the least significant aspect was duration. The results of the qualitative data collection showed that the project has been allocated sufficient funds, the personnel section was well prepared for the training according to the needs of the community, but lack of repair service personnel and it was necessary to ask for cooperation from Loei Technical College to carry out the co-project. 2) The evaluation of process factors indicated that the evaluation level was at the highest level (  = 4.53, S = 0.29) and passed all assessment criteria. The highest average value was project evaluation and the least mean aspect was project planning. The results of qualitative data collection showed that there were meetings at the provincial level, district level and school level to clarify the operation of the project, to survey the needs of the community, to publicize the project, to determine the project plan, to carry out repair and development service activities and also to solve problems together with following up on the operational results periodically.  3) The evaluation of the output (1) factors found that in terms of utilization for students participated in this project, the evaluation results were at a high level.