The pulpit as a representation of cosmology to contemporary space design

Main Article Content

Arnuphap Chantharamporn

Abstract

The study of the art history of pulpit design in Thailand originally focused only upon the beauty of Thai traditional art. Despite that, the objectives of this research are different. This study was aimed at analyzing the meaning, symbols, and beliefs in relation to the creations of Thai traditional pulpit designs from the ancient times. The assumptions of this study are that the traditional designs of pulpits were influenced by the belief in Tribhum or cosmology, both in terms of meanings of designs and functionality of pulpits. The data of this research were collected from selected pulpits, then the data were compared and analyzed to untangle hidden meanings in the design and to identify beliefs behind the art of pulpit creation. The findings showed that cosmological beliefs are the main guidelines to design the pulpits. Those designs are suggestive of the rank orders of the preachers who use them. Also, when the cosmological beliefs are intermingled with local or cultural beliefs of a specific group, it results in a variety of art and designs. Nevertheless, the creation of traditional pulpit designs which represents the cosmological belief may constitute out-of-date in this disruptive digital era where people expect to hear scientific explanations about the universe and the world. Therefore, social values of equality in society become the reasons why the use and creation of pulpits are no longer popular nowadays. However, the knowledge about the wisdom of the pulpit designs can be further developed to suit beliefs or ideologies of people in the modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิชาการ (Review Articles)

References

Buddhadasa Bhikkhu (Ed.). (2017). The Body Domain: Explanations of Thai Dharma Puzzle Written by Buddhadasa and Praphai Ekharaphanit (คำอธิบายภาพปริศนาธรรมไทยชุดกายนครของพุทธทาสภิกขุ คำโคลง ของ คุณประไพ เอกครพานิช). Bangkok: Tripidok.

Chaiyaporn, Chaiyan. (2010). Postmodern : Predestination of Post Modern in Ancient Phylosopher’s Handful (Postmodern : ชะตากรรมโพสต์โมเดิร์นในอุ้งมือนักปรัชญาการเมืองโบราณ) (3rd ed.). Bangkok: Openbook.

Fine Arts Department. (1993). Thai Traditional Painting Section 001: Book 4 the Ayutthaya Painting (จิตรกรรมไทยประเพณีชุดที่ 001 เล่มที่ 4 ลวดลายสมัยอยุธยา). Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing.

Fine Arts Department. (1999). Tri-Bhumi art book: Ayutthaya-Thonburi edition 2 vols (สมุดภาพไตรภูมิ ฉบับกรุงศรีอยุธยา-ฉบับธนบุรีเล่ม 2). Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing.

Jirathutsanakul, Somkid. (2003). Symbols and Meaning of Thai Door Facade and Window Panel (คติ สัญลักษณ์ และความหมาย ของซุ้มประตู - หน้าต่าง ไทย). Bangkok: Amarin Printing and Publishing.

Macharoen, Chaweengam. (1977). Bussabok Dhamma (บุษบกธรรมาสน์). Bangkok: Fine Arts Department.

Nor Na Paknam. (2000). Dhamma: The Glory of Thai Art (ธรรมาสน์ ศักดิ์และศรีแห่งศิลปะไทย). Bangkok: Muang Boran Press.

Pibulsombat, Bunme. (2000). Wat Koh Tha Rap District Phetchaburi Province (วัดเกาะ ตำบลท่าราบ จังหวัดเพชรบุรี). Phetchaburi: Petchpoom.

Prakitnonthakan, Chatri. (2015). Politics in Rama I Architecture (การเมืองในสถาปัตยกรรม สมัยรัชกาลที่ 1). Bangkok: Matichon.

Soonpongsri, Kamchorn. (2013). Aesthetics (สุนทรียศาสตร์) (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Uitekkeng, Komkrit. (2017). Mahabharata-Siam? Ghost Brahmin Buddhism? (ภารตะ-สยาม? ผี พราหมณ์ พุทธ?). Bangkok: Matichon.

Wilaiwan, Kwanphum. (2014). Traditional Thai Design and Ornamentation of Monks’ Pulpits in Ayutthaya (สมุดภาพลายเส้นธรรมาสน์แห่ง กรุงศรีอยุธยา). Bangkok: Artizan Press.