A Causal Model Development on Knowledge Management Affective in Intellectual Capital of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Production to Community Product Standard Certification in Lampang Province

Main Article Content

จตุรภัทร วงศ์สิริสถาพร

Abstract

This research aimed to develop a Knowledge Management causal model which affects Intellectual Capital of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Production to Community Product Standard Certification in Lampang Province. Both qualitative and quantitative research methodologies were applied in this research. The research targets are 215 executives of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Production to Community who were certified a Product Standard Certification in Lampang Province.  Research Instrument was a questionnaire which used a content validation by 3 experts to find a relationship between contents and research objectives. The 30 questionnaires was applied for a validity test by Cronbach’s Coefficient Alpha equals to 0.983. A Data analyses used descriptive analysis, frequencies, percentages, arithmetic means and standard deviation. On the other hand, Inferential Statistics, correlation analyses and influential path analyses were applied for this research. The research results found that The Knowledge Management causal model which affects Intellectual Capital of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Production to Community Product Standard Certification in Lampang Province have coherence with an empirical data by statistics of Chi-square goodness of fit =69.78,df= 55 , p-value = 0.08654 , RMSEA =0.035 , GFI =0.95 and, AGFI = 0.92. Knowledge Management infrastructures and Knowledge Management processes have a path coefficient of 0.95, Knowledge Management infrastructures and Human Capitals have a path coefficient of 0.43, Knowledge Management infrastructures and Structural Capitals have a path coefficient of 0.55, Knowledge Management Processes and Human Capitals have a path coefficient of 0.46 and Knowledge Management Processes and Structural Capitals have a path coefficient of 0.35 which have no statistical significance.  Knowledge Management Infrastructures have a direct positive relationship with Knowledge Management Processes, Knowledge Management Infrastructures has a direct positive relationship with Human Capitals and Structural Capitals, Knowledge Management Processes a direct positive relationship with Human Capitals but, Knowledge Management Processes have no influence with Structural Capital in statistical significance.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย (Research Articles)

References

ณพศิษฐ์ จักรพิทักษ์. (2552). ทฤษฎีการจัดการความรู้. เชียงใหม่: มหาวิทยาลัยเชียงใหม่.
ยุทธนา แซ่เตียว .(2547). การวัดการวิเคราะห์และการจัดการความรู้: สร้างองค์กรอัจฉริยะ.
กรุงเทพฯ: อินโนกราฟฟิกส์.
โยนก, มหาวิทยาลัย. (2551). รายงานการจัดทำยุทธศาสตร์การค้าจังหวัดลำปาง. ลำปาง:
เอกสารเผยแพร่.
สำนักงานมาตรฐานผลิตภัณฑ์อุตสาหกรรรม. (2555). [online]. Available: http:/tisi.go.th.
[2555, มกราคม 5].
สำนักงานส่งเสริมวิสาหกิจขนาดกลางและขนาดย่อม. (2552). การกำหนดเกณฑ์วิสาหกิจขนาดกลางและ
ขนาดย่อม. กรุงเทพฯ: กระทรวงอุตสาหกรรม.
สุภมาส อังศุโชติ, สมถวิล วิจิตรวรรณา และรัชนีกูล ภิญโญภานุวัฒน์. (2551). สถิติวิเคราะห์
สำหรับการวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์และพฤติกรรมศาสตร์ : เทคนิคการใช้โปรแกรม
Lisrel. กรุงเทพฯ: มิสชั่น มีเดีย.
Afiouni, F. (2007). Human resource management and knowledge management:
road map toward improving organizational performance, Journal of
American Academy of Business Cambridge, 11(2), 124- 130.
Bontis, N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual
capital: framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal
of Technology Management, 18(5), 433-462.
Edvinsson, L. & Malone, M.S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s
truevalue by finding its hidden roots. New York: Harper Business.
Hamlin, B. (2011). What is HRD? A definitional review and synthesis of the HRD
domain. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(3), 199 -220.
Kaytz, K., & Thaysen, K. (2001). Knowledge, learning and IT support in a small
software company. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5, 349-357.
Kim, S. & Lee, H. (2010). Factors affecting employee knowledge acquisition and
application capabilities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration,
2(2), 133-152.
Lai, M. F., & Lee, G. G. (2007). Relationships of organization culture toward knowledge
activities. Business Process Management Journal, 13(2), 43.
Lawson, S. (2003). Examining the relationship between organization culture and
management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern
University, Florida.
Lindsey, K. (2002). Measuring knowledge management effectiveness: A task-
contingent organizational capability perspective. Proceeding of the 8th
Americas Conference on Information System, pp. 2085-2090.

Longo, M. & Mura, M. (2007). A multidimensional measure of employees’
intangibles a managerial implementation of the tool. Management
Research News, 30(8), 548-569.
Mahesh, K., & Suresh, J. K. (2009). Knowledge criteria for organization design.
Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 41-51.
Munro, B. H. (2005). Statistical method for healthcare research (5 thed.). R.R.
Donnelley-Crawfordsvill : United State of America.
Smith, T.A. (2006).Knowledge management and its capabilities linked to the
Business strategy for organizational effectiveness. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, Florida
Tovstiga, G. & Tulugurova, E. (2007). Intellectual capital practices and performance
in Russian enterprises. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8(4), 695- 707.
Waltz, E. (2003). Knowledge management in the intelligence enterprise. Norwood, Artech House.
Wan, H.L. (2007). Human capital development policies: enhancing employees’
satisfaction. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31, (4), 297-322.
Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business Research Methods. Ohio : United States of America.