Implementing a Plan-Do-Review Cycle to Improve Thai Teenage Students’ Homework Completion Rates

Main Article Content

Garry Bryn Hobbs
Aaron Stuart Hall

Abstract

This study examined the impact of formative assessment and motivational strategies on homework completion among Thai adolescents aged 13-16 who were studying a beginner-level coursebook at a private language school in Bangkok. Before the intervention, a questionnaire adapted from the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) assessed students' attitudes towards the school's current homework approach. The IMI questionnaire was also administered periodically throughout the study to monitor changes in these attitudes over time. Results indicated that while students recognised the value of homework, their motivation was lacking, leading to homework being copied or left incomplete. The intervention introduced a Plan-Do-Review cycle through a 'homework wheel', which included tools such as a learning wall, goal-setting forms, and a star chart to foster engagement and self-reflection. Data collection involved quantitative and qualitative methods. Homework completion rates and goal achievement percentages were examined and interpreted within a Google Sheets spreadsheet, along with qualitative field notes on student behaviour and attitudes. Findings revealed a significant increase in homework completion and intrinsic motivation, with students developing more positive attitudes to homework. This research offers practical insights for educators seeking to improve homework completion and student motivation in similar educational settings.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hobbs, G. B., & Hall, A. S. (2025). Implementing a Plan-Do-Review Cycle to Improve Thai Teenage Students’ Homework Completion Rates. THAITESOL Journal, 38(2), 55–79. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaitesoljournal/article/view/275665
Section
Articles

References

Altundag, C. K. (2019). Examination of high school students’ attitudes towards homework, procrastination behaviors and efficacy beliefs. SHS Web Conf, 66(2), 1-5.

Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586-

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586

Bekhet, A., & Zausniewski, J. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding Data. Nurse Res, 20(2), 40-43. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in education.

Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Boekaerts, M. (2002). Motivation to Learn. IAE-IBE UNESCO.

Brewster, C., & Fager, J. (2000). Increasing student engagement and motivation: From time-on-

task to homework. https://educationnorthwest.org/sites/default/files/byrequest.pdf

Britton, M. (2021). Assessment for Learning in Primary Language Learning and Teaching. Multilingual Matters

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge University Press.

Centre for Self-Determination Theory. (2020). Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI). https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/

Cheng, H. F., & Dörnyei, Z. (2007). The use of motivational strategies in language instruction: The case of EFL teaching in Taiwan. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1),

–174. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt048.0

Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31(3), 197-217. https:// doi.org//10.1017/S026144480001315X

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press. Elliott, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Handbook of Competence and Motivation. Guilford Press.

Ellis, G., & Ibrahim, N. (2016). English Teaching Professional, 103, 4-7.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hobbs, G. B., & Mourão, S. (2025). Take-home tests as an assessment for learning strategy, ELT Journal, 79(1), 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccae023

Latham, G., & Locke, E. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task

motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute-by-minute and day-by-day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18-24.

Maharaj, N. (2016). Using field notes to facilitate critical reflection. Reflective Practice, 17(2), 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2015.1134472

Moon, J. (2000). Children Learning English. Macmillan Heinemann.

Ng, C.-H. (2003). Re-conceptualizing achievement goals from a cultural perspective. Paper presented at joint conference of NZARE & AARE, Auckland, New Zealand.

Nguyen, T. P. V., Lee, Y. F., Le, T. H., & Nguyen, H. B. N. (2023). Applying a formative assessment model for a blended learning environment to promote students’ engagement and motivation.

International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(11), 1735-1740.

https://doi.org/ 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.11.1983

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A

model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Nuzum, M. (1998). Creating Success. Instructor, 108(3), 86-91.

Oden, M. (2020). Student Motivation and Homework Completion. Miami-Dade County Public Schools, Office of Assessment, Research, and Data Analysis.

Olson, K. (2018). Do upper elementary students have higher grades when they complete their homework? Northwestern College.

Painter, L. (2003). Homework. OUP Oxford.

Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2010). Feedback all that effort but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277-289.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007

Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman. B. J. (2011). Developing Self-Regulation Skills: The Important Role of Homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194-218.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1102200202

Richards, J. C. (2016). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom.

RELC Journal, 46(1), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and mew directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.

https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and achievement:

Theory and research. In W. M. Reynolds & G. E. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology, Vol. 7, 177–198. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Spector, J. M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D., Yang, J. L., Mukama, E., Warusavitarana, A., . . . Gibson,

D. C. (2016). Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 58-71.

Tantiwich, K., & Sinwongsuwat, K. (2021). Thai university students’ problems of language use in

English conversation. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 14(2), 598-626.

Wiliam, D. (2011a). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3-14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Wiliam, D. (2011b). Embedded Formative Assessment. Solution Tree Press.

Wright, V., & Price, J. (2009). The time use of teenagers. Social Science Research, 38(4), 792-809.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.009

Xu, J., & Yuan, R. (2003). Doing homework: Listening to students, parents,' and teachers' voices in one urban middle school community. School Community Journal, 13(2), 25-44.