ข้อจำกัดในการแก้ไขเพิ่มเติมรัฐธรรมนูญโดยปริยายที่เรียกว่า “อัตลักษณ์ทางรัฐธรรมนูญ” : กรณีศึกษาฝรั่งเศส อิตาลี เยอรมนี สเปน ตุรกี และอินเดีย

Supanut Boonsod

Authors

Supanut Boonsod Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Phetchaburi Rajabhat University

Keywords:

Constitutional Identity, Constitutional Amendment power, Judicial Coup d’état

Abstract

This article aims to study the relationship between the concept of constitutional identity and the principles of constitutional law. The study reveals that the concept of constitutional identity was constructs from an ideological in an extensive time, it emerges from judicial activism era which related to the material review of the constitutionality regarding constitutional amendments. According to the study, it was found that the parliamentary that has a power to amend the constitutional amendment was interfered by judicial power known as constitutional identity. Therefore, this kind of power prescribes the constitution with some limitations called “implicit constitution unamendment”. Moreover, this article involves the exploration of the comparison of the concept of constitutional identity in six countries: France, Italy, Germany, Spain, Turkey and India.

References

Alec Stone Sweet. “The Juridical Coup d’État and the Problem of Authority.” German Law Journal. Vol. 8 . Issue 10: Special issue – ‘Coup d'état in the courtroom’. (01 October 2007). 915 – 927.

Alexander Hamilton Jay Madison and James Madison. The Federalist. J. R. Pole (ed.). Cambridge: Hackett Publish. 2005.

Bidyut Chakrabarty. India’s Constitutional Identity Ideological Beliefs and Preferences. Oxon: Routledge. 2019.

Biljana Kostadinov. “Constitutional Identity.” Lutinianus Primus Review. 3. 2012. 1-20.

Carl Schmitt. Constitutional Theory. United State. Duke university press. 2008.

Cristian Calliess and Gerhard Van Der Schyff (Ed.). Constitutional identity in A Europe of multilevel of constitutional. United Kingdom: Cambridge university press. 2020.

Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn and Yaniv Roznai. Constitutional Revolution, USA: Yale University Press. 2020.

Gary Jeffrey Jacobsohn. Constitutional Identity. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 2010.

Manit Jumpa and Pornson Liengboonlertchai. United State Constitution, Bangkok. Winyuchon. 2552. [in Thai]

Martin Loughlin and Neil Walker (Ed.). The Paradox of Constitutionalism : Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. United Kingdom: Oxford university press. 2007.

Michel Rosenfeld and Adras Sajo (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. United kingdom: Oxford university press. 2012.

Michel Rosenfeld. The Identity of The Constitutional Subject : Selfhood, Cititzenship, Culture, and Community. New York: Routledge. 2010.

Monika Polzin. “Constitutional identity, unconstitutional amendments and the idea of constituent power: The development of the doctrine of constitutional identity in German constitutional law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 14. Issue 2. (April 2016). 411–438.

Natpakhan Latcharojana. “Limitations on Constitutional Amendment.” Master of Law Thesis. Faculty of Law. Thammasat University. 2558. [in Thai]

Piyaburt Seangkanokkul. Constitutional Law. Bangkok : Faculty o Law Thammasat University press. 2560. [in Thai]

Puli Fuwongcharoen. “Militant democracy : judicialization and the protection of democracy.” Nitisat Thammasat University Journal. Vol. 43. issue 3. (September 2557). 631-659. [in Thai]

Sanford Levinson (Ed.). Responding to Imperfection: The theory and Practice of Constitutional Amendment. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press. 1995.

Yaniv Roznai and Serkan Yolcu. “An unconstitutional constitutional amendment—The Turkish perspective: A comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s headscarf decision.” International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 10. Issue 1. January 2012. 175–207.

Yaniv Roznai. Unconstitutional constitutional amendment. United Kingdom: Oxford university press. 2017.