Securitization VS. Desecuritization: Sino-American Strategic Competition in Southeast Asia

Main Article Content

Chuthamat Sae-lo


Southeast Asia has become the new terrain of great powers competition. The influence of the United States, a leader of the free world, is challenged by the rising communist China. On the one hand, China’s increasingly assertive foreign policy in territorial disputes with its neighbors has destabilized peace and security in the region. On the other hand, the intentions behind Chinese soft power deployment through Belt and Road Initiatives (BRI) are suspected as Beijing aims to dominate its backyard countries in Southeast Asia. This paper, therefore, presents the strategic assessment of Sino-American competition in Southeast Asia. The first section explores the deployment of Washington’s strategy (securitization of China) and Beijing’s strategy (desecuritization) to catch Southeast Asian attention. With this background, the second section discusses the challenge posed by desecuritization strategy of China through the BRI. The pragmatic-oriented foreign policy, debt-trap diplomacy, aid assistance led by Chinese state-owned enterprises, and the inconsistency of American foreign policy have intensified the success of Chinese grand strategy which is characterized as deceptive agendas. Assuming from the current situation, there are three possible scenarios to occur. The third section predicts the worst-case scenario of Chinese neo-colonialism in Southeast Asia. The ‘self-reliant’ Southeast Asian states are the future best-case scenario described in the fourth section. In the fifth section, the intractable great powers conflict and the hum and haw foreign policy of ASEAN nations reflect the business as usual. To avoid the worst-case and move beyond the business as usual, the two possible solutions are demonstrated in the sixth section. In this section, the analysis focuses on each Southeast Asian state’s capacity development and the collective efforts in strengthening the robust regional organization, respectively. Finally, the present paper proposes five strategic recommendations to ASEAN in order to be able to deal with the external challenges and attain the ultimate benefits for its member states.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details



Ambrosio, Thomas, Carson Schram, and Preston Heopfner. “The American securitization of
China and Russia: U.S. geopolitical culture and declining unipolarity,” Eurasian
Geography and Economics 61, no.2 (2020): 162-194.

Bernard, Victor. “Is It Time for a Peacekeeping Force for ASEAN?,” The Asia Foundation,
February 3, 2016,

Breslin, Shuan, Richard Higgott, and Ben Rosamond. “Chapter 1: Regions in comparative
perspective,” in New Regionalisms on the Global Political Economy, ed. Shaun
Breslin et al. (London: Routledge, 2002): 1-19.

Bourbeau, Philippe, and Juha A. Vuori. “Security, Resilience, and Desecuritization:
Multidirectional Moves and Dynamic,” Critical Studies on Security 3, no.3 (2015):

Buchan, Patrick G., and Benjamin Rimland. “Defining the Diamond: The Past, Present, and
Future of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue,” Center for Strategic and International
Studies (CSIS), March 16, 2020,

Chand, Bibek, and Zenel Garcia. “Power Politics and Securitization: The Emerging
Indo–Japanese Nexus in Southeast Asia,” Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies 4, no.2
(2017): 310-324.

“Commerce and Conflict: Navigating Myanmar’s China Relationship,” International Crisis
Group, March 30, 2020,

“Coronavirus: Trump accuses WHO of being a puppet of China,” BBC News, May 19, 2020,

Daly, Eoin, Kaushik Das, and Rebecca Yeoh. “Reimagining emerging ASEAN in the wake of
COVID-19,” Mckinsey & Company, September 2, 2020,

Djalal, Dino P. “Why Trump’s Anti-China Policy Falls on Deaf Ears in Southeast Asia,” The
Diplomat, October 15, 2020,

Ghimire, Safal. “Rising powers and security: a false dawn of the pro-south world order?,”
Global Change, Peace & Security 30, no.1 (2018):37-55.

Green, Michael J., and Gregory B. Poling. “Biden Can Engage Southeast Asia and Still
Promote Good Governance,” Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS),
November 13, 2020,

Hiebert, Murray. “China's Belt and Road Initiative faces huge challenges in Southeast Asia,”
ThinkChina, September 3, 2020,

“Huawei - "Trojan horses for Chinese intelligence" still welcomed,” The Financial,
February 21, 2020,

Hunt, Luke. “Joe Biden's long and bumpy road in Southeast Asia,” UCA News, November
12, 2020,

Ikenberry, John G., and Micheal Mastanduno. “Introduction: International Relations Theory
and the Search for Regional Stability,” in International Relations Theory and the
Asia-Pacific, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al. (New York: Columbia University Press,
2003), 1-22.

Jakimów, Małgorzata. “Desecuritisation as a soft power strategy: the Belt and Road Initiative,
European fragmentation and China’s normative influence in Central-Eastern Europe,”
Asia Europe Journal 17, (2019): 369-385.

Jamal, Umair. “Could ASEAN expel Cambodia and Laos over their allegiance to China?,”
ASEAN Today, November 17, 2020,

Jones, Lee. “Security Order and State Transformation in Asia: Beyond Geopolitics and Grand Strategy,” German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP), (2019): 1-18.

Jones, Lee, and Shahar Hameiri. “Debunking the Myth of ‘Debt-trap Diplomacy’:How
Recipient Countries Shape China’s Belt and Road Initiative,” Chatham House, 19
August, 2020.

Kang, David. “Chapter4: Hierarchy and Stability in Asian International Relations,” in
International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, ed. John G. Ikenberry et al.
(New York: Columbia University Press, 2003), 163-190.

Kapur, Saloni, and Simon Mabon. “The Copenhagen School goes global:
securitisation in the Non-West,” Global Discourse 8, no.1 (2018): 1-4.

Koga, Kei. “ASEAN’s Evolving Institutional Strategy: Managing Great Power Politics in
South China Sea Disputes,” The Chinese Journal of International Politics, (2018):

Kopf, Dan. “ASEAN is now a bigger trading partner for China than the US,” QUARTZ, May
28, 2020,

Liang, Lu-Hai. “Sri Lanka hands over port to China to pay off debt,” The National News,
September 11, 2018,

Nortajuddin, Athira. “The Future Of Consumption In ASEAN,” The ASEAN Post, November
4, 2020,

Nyman, Jonna, and Jinghan Zeng. “Securitization in Chinese climate and energy politics,”
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7, no.2 (2016): 301-313.

Ogasawara, Takayuki. “Development of the Mekong Region as Part of Japan's Diplomatic
Strategy for East Asia,” Asia-Pacific Review 22, no.1 (2015): 34-45.

Park, Jinsoo. “Regional Leadership Dynamics and the Evolution of East Asian Regionalism,”
Pacific Focus 27, no.2 (2012): 290-318.

Parpart, Erich. “Japanese and South Korean businesspeople within the EEC could be the first
group of foreigners to enter Thailand with the new “business bubble”,” Thai Enquirer,
June 22, 2020,

Paul, Kari. “Trump's bid to ban TikTok and WeChat: where are we now?,” The Guardian,
September 29, 2020,

Ping, Chong Koh. “US-China trade war: Will Asean benefit?,” The Straits Times, July 15,

Scobell, Andrew, et al. “Chapter 6: Future Scenarios, Competitive Trajectories, and
Implications,” in China’s Grand Strategy: Trends, Trajectories, and Long-Term
Competition (Santa Monica, RAND Corporation, 2020), 101-153.

Sevastopulo, Demetri. “Trump labels China a strategic ‘competitor’,” The Financial Times,
December 19, 2017,

Strangio, Sebastian. “Australia Mulling Hefty Aid Injection for Lower Mekong Nation,” The
Diplomat, October 14, 2020,

Strangio, Sebastian. “Could ASEAN Really Cut Laos and Cambodia Loose?,” The Diplomat,
October 29, 2020,

Strangio, Sebastian. “What Would a Biden Administration Mean for Southeast Asia?,” The
Diplomat, November 3, 2020,

Sung, Hsing-Chou. “Chinese Capitalism and the Development of the ASEAN Economic
Community: A Perspective of Desecuritization,” in The Sociology of Chinese
Capitalism in Southeast Asia: Challenges and Prospects, ed. Yos Santasombat.
(Chiang Mai, Palgrave Macillan, 2019), 27-54.

The Policy Planning Staff, Office of the Secretary of State, The Elements of the China
Challenge, (2020), 17.

“To a different tune: Joe Biden’s China policy will be a mix of Trump’s and Obama’s,” The
Economist, November 19, 2020,

Viala-Gaudefroy, Jérôme, and Dana Lindaman. “Donald Trump’s ‘Chinese virus’: the politics
of naming,” The Conversation, April 22, 2020,

Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. “The United States, China, and Geo-politics in the Mekong Region,”
Asian Affairs An American Review 42, no.4 (2015): 173-194.

Zhang, Denghua. “The Concept of ‘Community of Common Destiny’ in China's Diplomacy:
Meaning, Motives and Implications,” Asia & The Pacific Policy Studies 5, no.2
(2018):196-207. DOI: 10.1002/app5.231