The Development of Teacher’s Research Ability with Using Local Wisdom to Promote Analytical Thinking
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14456/rcmrj.2021.241451Keywords:
The development of research ability, Local wisdom, Analytical thinkingAbstract
The purposes of this research were 1) to study current conditions of learning management the needs of teachers in developing learning management and research using local wisdom to promote students’ analytical thinking skills; 2) to design the research development process of teachers who use local wisdom to promote analytical thinking skills; and 3) to study the results of the development of teacher’s research ability with using local wisdom to promote analytical thinking. The target area was Chonprathanpataek School, Doi Saket District, Chiang Mai Province. The population were 24 teachers and 406 students. There were 3 steps to perform the work 1) planning, 2) teacher development process, and 3) the follow-up process for evaluating teacher development. The research instruments were situation analysis record, a research knowledge test, research quality evaluation form, a test of analytical thinking skills of learners, and questionnaires of teachers' opinions on development. The collected data were analyzed by using mean, standard deviation, percentage, and content analysis for the qualitative data. The results are as follows:
1) Current conditions of teacher learning management still lacking promotion of analytical thinking. Teachers want to improve their morale, research process, learning management that promotes analytical thinking skills, the measurement and evaluation that promotes analytical thinking skills and writing research reports. 2) Teacher development process created by the participation process consisting of workshops training, workshop,actual field operations and supervisory from executives. 3) In overall, the research score after joining the development is higher than before the development. The average percentage of teacher quality evaluation scores of teachers is higher than the 70 percent criteria. The scores of analytical thinking skills of students after learning with integrates local wisdom to promote analytical thinking skills are higher than before studying at all levels. Teachers have positive opinions on the development process.
References
Art-In, S. (2011). The Development of a Learning Management Model Emphasizing Analytical Thinking in the Science Learning Area. KKU Research Journal, 16(1), 72-78. (In Thai)
Avorn, S., & Nam-Naphon, K. (2014). Teacher Development in Learning Management in Critical Thinking. Pha Namthip Wittaya School Secondary Educational Service Area Office 27. Journal of the Graduate School of Pichayatorn, 9(2), 71-80. (In Thai)
Boonphadung, S. (2014). The Development of Teachers’ Research Competency based on Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) and Partnership. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 16(4), 22-33. (In Thai)
Boripis, T. (2009). Supervision and evaluation. Bangkok: Thonburi Rajabhat University. (In Thai)
Chaiphan, S. (2010). Teacher and Research Practice: Classroom Research. Journal of Narathiwas Rajanagarindra University, 2(3), 99-114. (In Thai)
Chotvichai, Y. (2014). The Development of Learning Package in Local Wisdoms for Subject for Analytical Thinking Development of Chandrakasem Rajabhat University Students. Chandrakasem Rajabhat University Journal, 20(38), 51-58. (In Thai)
Jaichakad, W. (2017). Teacher Development Strategy for Teaching Analytical Thinking in Secondary Schools under the Secondary Educational Service Area Office 8. (Master of Education Thesis, Chulalongkorn University). (In Thai)
Khaemmanee, T. (2009). The Science of Teaching Knowledge to Organize an Effective Learning Process. (10th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Khamparat, J. (2006). Teaching Arts for the Development of Elementary Creativity. Bangkok: 2020 World Media. (In Thai)
Kowtrakul, S. (2007). Educational Psychology. (7th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum, B.E. 2551. Bangkok: Printing house for delivery of goods and packages. (In Thai)
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2012). Guidelines for Organizing the Learning Process According to the Focus on the Development of Learner Quality Thinking Skills. Learning Process Development Group Office of Academic and Educational Standards. (In Thai)
Office of Nation Education Standards and Quality Assessment (ONESQA) [Public Organisation]. (2007). Summary Synthesis of Quality Assessment Results outside the Basic Education Institutions (First round 2001-2005). Retrieved from http://www.onesqa.or.th/th/home/index.php (In Thai)
Office of Standards and Quality Assessment (ONESQA) [Public Organization]. (2018). Indicators and Evaluation Criteria for the 4th Round (2016-2020). Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/srinan.ac.th/internal-quality-assurance/taw-bng-chi-laea-kenth-kar-pramein-sms-rxb4-2559-2563 (In Thai)
Panich, W. (2017). Way to create learning for students in the 21st century. Bangkok: Sodsri-Saritwong Foundation. (In Thai)
Sompamitr, T. (2015). The Implementation of Local Play-Oriented Learning Modules Designed For Mattayomsueksa 2 Ethnical Students’ Scientific Skill Improvements. Graduate School Journal Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, 8(18), 67-74. (In Thai)
Varakamin, D., Rukumnuaykit, P., & Saifah, Y. (2016). A study of Critical Thinking and Public Mental Abilities to Develop the Potential of Being a Good and Talented Thai Student. Retrieved from https://www.knowledgefarm.in.th/critical-thinking-and-civic-mindedness-on-thai-student/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Articles, information, content, images, etc. that are published in "Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal" is the copyright of Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal. Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. If any person or organization wants to distribute all or any part of it or do any action Must have written permission from the Chiang Mai Rajabhat Research Journal, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University.
2. Content of articles appearing in the journal is the responsibility of the author of the article. The journal editor is not required to agree or take any responsibility.