Love is Better than Liking: Comparison of the Effects of Brand Love and Brand Likeability on Consumer Repurchase Intention – A Case Study of Fashion and Barber/Hairdresser
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57260/rcmrj.2023.261925Keywords:
Brand love, Brand likeability, Brand relationship, Repurchase intention, Risk, ProductsAbstract
The concept of brand love is gradually derived from positive consumer experiences and strong consumer-brand relationships. Branding literature supports that the power of brand love can tie consumers with the brand and motivate them to purchase products continuously. However, consumers’ risk perceptions which are hidden in different product types, as in goods and services, may devalue the power of brand love and pose difficulties for the consumer before purchasing. Although existing literature suggests that positive consumer-brand relationships can be a significant source of risk reduction, little is known about the association between brand love and repurchase intention based on consumers’ risk perceptions for different service-products. This paper aims to investigate the effects of brand love on repurchase intention for fashion and barber/hairdresser. Fashion is chosen for goods category while barber/hairdressers is selected for service category because they can reflex the consumers’ personalities and possibly generate emotional love-like experiences. An online survey is used to collect data from a convenience sample in Australia. By using quantitative method, this study also compares the power of brand love with brand likeability on repurchase intention. The results from Partial least squares-Structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) clearly indicated that the effects of brand love on repurchase intention are stronger than brand likeability for both fashion and barber/hairdressers. These provide insightful knowledge for researchers and practitioners. In theory, the results offer a new perspective on how positive consumer and brand relationships can be used to curtail consumer risk perceptions and induce repurchase intention. In practice, this study provides a better understanding of how brand managers can use brand love strategies for marketing purposes effectively.
References
Albert, N., Merunka, D., & Valette-Florence, P. (2009). The feeling of love toward a brand: Concept and measurement. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 300-307. http://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/14537/volumes/v36/NA-36
Amaro, S., Barroco, C., & Antunes, J. (2021). Exploring the antecedents and outcomes of destination brand love. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 30(3), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2019-2487
Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
Bagozzi, R. P., Batra, R., & Ahuvia, A. (2017). Brand love: Development and validation of a practical scale. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-016-9406-1
Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services—growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300402
Bıçakcıoğlu, N., İpek, İ., & Bayraktaroğlu, G. (2018). Antecedents and outcomes of brand love: The mediating role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(8), 863-877. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2016.1244108
Campbell, M. C. (1999). Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379903600204
Carroll, B., & Ahuvia, A. (2006). Some antecedents and outcomes of brand love. Marketing Letters, 17(2), 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2
Chen, S.-C., & Quester, P. G. (2015). The relative contribution of love and trust towards customer loyalty. Australasian Marketing Journal, 23(1), 13-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.12.003
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Collier, R. (2009). Rapidly rising clinical trial costs worry researchers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(3), 277-278. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.082041
Cox, D. F., & Rich, S. U. (1964). Perceived risk and consumer decision-making—the case of telephone shopping. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224376400100405
Danaher, P. J., Conroy, D. M., & McColl-Kennedy, J. R. (2008). Who wants a relationship anyway? Conditions when consumers expect a relationship with their service provider. Journal of Service Research, 11(1), 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670508319095
De Chernatony, L., & McDonald, M. (2003). Creating powerful brands in consumer, service and industrial markets. (3rd ed.). Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
Drozdenko, R., & Jensen, M. (2005). Risk and maximum acceptable discount levels. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(4), 264-270. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510609285
Ferrell, O. C., Hartline, M., & Hochstein, B. W. (2021). Marketing strategy. Massachusetts, MA: Cengage Learning.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1086/209515
Fuchs, C., Schreier, M., & van Osselaer, S. M. (2015). The handmade effect: What's love got to do with it?. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 98-110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0018
Giertz, J. N., Hollebeek, L. D., Weiger, W. H., & Hammerschmidt, M. (2022). The invisible leash: When human brands hijack corporate brands' consumer relationships. Journal of Service Management, 33(3), 485-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-06-2021-0211
Guseman, D. (1981). Risk perception and risk reduction in consumer service. In J. Donnelly, & W. Gorge (Eds.), Marketing of services (pp.200-204). Orlando, FL: American Marketing Association.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2233795
Harman, H. H. (1967). Modern factor analysis. (3rd ed.), New Jersey, NJ: University of Chicago press.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Ismail, A. R., & Spinelli, G. (2012). Effects of brand love, personality and image on word of mouth: The case of fashion brands among young consumers. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 16(4), 386-398. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612021211265791
Jansson-Boyd, C. V. (2010). Consumer psychology. Berkshire, England: McGraw Hill.
Joshi, R., & Garg, P. (2021). Role of brand experience in shaping brand love. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(2), 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12618
Karjaluoto, H., Munnukka, J., & Kiuru, K. (2016). Brand love and positive word of mouth: The moderating effects of experience and price. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 25(6), 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2015-0834
Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 595-600. https://doi.org/10.1086/346254
Langner, T., Schmidt, J., & Fischer, A. (2015). Is it really love? A comparative investigation of the emotional nature of brand and interpersonal love. Psychology and Marketing, 32(6), 624-634. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20805
Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2003). Services marketing: People, technology, strategy. (5th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
McColl‐Kennedy, J. R., & Fetter, R. E. (1999). Dimensions of consumer search behavior in services. Journal of Services Marketing, 13(3), 242-265. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049910273871
Mitchell, V., & Greatorex, M. (1993). Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services. Service Industries Journal, 13(4), 179-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069300000068
Murray, K. B., & Schlacter, J. L. (1990). The impact of services versus goods on consumers’ assessment of perceived risk and variability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729762
Nayyar, P., & Templeton, P. (1994). Seller beware: Information asymmetry and the choice of generic competitive strategies for service business. In T. Swartz, D. Bowen, & S. Brown (Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management research and practice (pp. 95-125). London, England: JAI Press Inc.
Nelson, P. (1970). Information and consumer behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329. https://doi.org/10.1086/259630
Nguyen, B., Choudhury, M., & Melewar, T. (2014). An integrated model of firms’ brand likeability: Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 23(2), 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2014.914071
Nguyen, B., Melewar, T., & Chen, J. (2013). A framework of brand likeability: An exploratory study of likeability in firm-level brands. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(4), 368-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2013.790472
Phililip, K., & Keller, K. L. (2016). A framework for marketing management. (6th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Pearson Education.
Pradhan, D., Duraipandian, I., & Sethi, D. (2016). Celebrity endorsement: How celebrity–brand–user personality congruence affects brand attitude and purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 22(5), 456-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2014.914561
Putrevu, S., & Lord, K. R. (1994). Comparative and noncomparative advertising: Attitudinal effects under cognitive and affective involvement conditions. Journal of Advertising, 23(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1994.10673443
Reinhard, M. A., & Messner, M. (2009). The effects of source likeability and need for cognition on advertising effectiveness under explicit persuasion. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 8(4), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.282
Rossiter, J. R. (2012). A new C-OAR-SE-based content-valid and predictively valid measure that distinguishes brand love from brand liking. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-012-9173-6
Schultz, D. E., Barnes, J. G., Schultz, H. F., & Azzaro, M. (2009). Building customer-brand relationships. Communicative Business, 1, 123-126.
Shimp, T. A., & Madden, T. J. (1988). Consumer-object relations: A conceptual framework based analogously on Sternberg's triangular theory of love. Advances in Consumer Research, 15, 163-168.
Soares, A. M., Farhangmehr, M., & Shoham, A. (2007). Hofstede's dimensions of culture in international marketing studies. Journal of Business research, 60(3), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.018
Taher, A., & El Basha, H. (2006). Heterogeneity of consumer demand: Opportunities for pricing of services. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 15(5), 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420610685884
Thomson, M., MacInnis, D. J., & Whan Park, C. (2005). The ties that bind: Measuring the strength of consumers’ emotional attachments to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10
Zeithaml, V., Bitner, M., & Gremler, D. (2009). Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rajabhat Chiang Mai Research Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Articles, information, content, images, etc published in the “Community and Social Development Journal” are copyrighted by the Community and Social Development Journal, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. In order to properly distribute the articles through print and electronic media, the authors still hold the copyright for the published articles under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows the re-distribution of the articles in other sources. References must be made to the articles in the journal. The authors are responsible for requesting permission to reproduce copyrighted content from other sources.
2. The content of the articles appearing in the journal is the direct responsibility of the article authors. The editorial board of the journal does not necessarily agree with or share any responsibility.
