Assistive Technology and Mathematics for Learners with Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57260/csdj.2026.284762Keywords:
Assistive technology, Mathematics instruction, Learners with disabilities, Inclusive education, Teacher trainingAbstract
This study explored the integration of assistive technology (AT) in mathematics instruction for learners with disabilities at Tanauan School of Fisheries during the School Year 2024–2025. It examined the common difficulties encountered by learners, the assistive technologies used by teachers, the challenges faced in implementation, and the support needed for effective integration. The research utilized a descriptive-qualitative design, involving seven mathematics teachers who participated in structured interviews. Findings indicated that learners with disabilities commonly faced challenges such as mathematics anxiety, low self-esteem, difficulty processing mathematical concepts, and sensory impairments. Teachers integrated various assistive technologies, including visual aids, interactive platforms like Kahoot and Khan Academy, and adaptive tools such as screen readers and tactile graphics. Despite their benefits, implementation was hindered by inadequate training, limited resources, and lack of institutional support. The study underscores that for AT to be effective, comprehensive support in the form of financial assistance, professional development, and strong administrative commitment is essential. It concludes that AT can significantly enhance inclusivity, engagement, and mathematical achievement when integrated systematically into instruction.
Downloads
References
Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 52–72. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295
Alper, S., & Raharinirina, S. (2006). Assistive Technology for Individuals with Disabilities: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21(2), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340602100204
Antara, W. S., Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2024). Assistive Technology in Mathematics Education: Investigating the Effectiveness of Math Manipulatives for Students with Disabilities, International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(3), 519-527. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i3.85378
Courtade, G., Browder, D. M., & Wood, L. (2020). Aligning instruction to math standards for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Brookes Publishing.
Department of Education. (2022). Republic Act No. 11650: Strengthening inclusive education for learners with disabilities in the Philippines. Philippines.
Hord, C., Duppstadt, M., Marita, S., & Pescatrice, S. (2021). Access to seventh grade mathematics: A case study of two students with mild intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 25(1), 31-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629519858561
Jones, T., & Smith, R. (2019). Professional development in assistive technology: Its impact on adaptive learning tool implementation. Inclusive Education Press.
Jwaifell. M. & Gasaymeh, A. M. (2013). Using the Diffusion of Innovation Theory to Explain the Degree of English Teachers’ Adoption of Interactive Whiteboards in the Modern Systems School in Jordan: A Case Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6098
Kanya, S., Eryilmaz, N. & Yuksel, D. (2022). The effects of motivational and metacognitive variables on immigrant and non-immigrant students’ reading achievement. International Journal of Educational Research, 112, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101944
Milošević, D., Trifunović, N., & Jevtić, B. (2024). Pupils’ Avoidance Strategies in Mathematics and their Perception of the Teachers’ Performance and Mastery. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(2), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-2-283-293
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2018). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.
Nelson, M. J., & Hawk, N. A. (2020). The impact of field experiences on prospective preservice teachers’ technology integration beliefs and intentions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, 103006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103006
Özdemir, O. (2025). Kahoot! Game-based digital learning platform: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 41(1), e13084. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13084
Retiro, K. T., Jumao-As, A. N., Gonzales, W. C., Pepito, J. C., Capuno, R. C., Reyes, N. T., Pinili, L. C., Cabigon, A. P., Espina, R. C., & Añero, M. B. (2025). Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the Use of Assistive Technology and Its Correlation with Student Learning Outcomes in Special and Inclusive Education. Power System Technology, 49(1), 1451-1478. https://powertechjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/1694
Rubinsten, O., & Tannock, R. (2010). Mathematics anxiety in children with developmental dyscalculia. Behav Brain Funct 6, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-6-46
Schwab, S., & Alnahdi, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ judgments of students’ school-wellbeing, social inclusion, and academic self-concept: A multi-trait-multimethod analysis using the Perception of Inclusion Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01498
Shahzad, M., Ray, S., & Panigrahi, A. (2026). Assistive Technology in Inclusive Mathematics Education for Students with Visual Impairment: A Conceptual Framework. Synergy: International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.63960/sp.2026.sijmds.3.1.63
Smith, J., & Johnson, L. (2020). Math anxiety and performance in students with learning disabilities: A systematic review. Special Needs Education Publishing.
United Nations. (2017). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). https://www.un.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Community and Social Development Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Articles, information, content, images, etc published in the “Community and Social Development Journal” are copyrighted by the Community and Social Development Journal, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. In order to properly distribute the articles through print and electronic media, the authors still hold the copyright for the published articles under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows the re-distribution of the articles in other sources. References must be made to the articles in the journal. The authors are responsible for requesting permission to reproduce copyrighted content from other sources.
2. The content of the articles appearing in the journal is the direct responsibility of the article authors. The editorial board of the journal does not necessarily agree with or share any responsibility.



