The Influences of Principal Leadership and Mediating Factors Affecting Student Learning Quality in Primary Schools under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration

Authors

  • วรรณพร ศิลาขาว
  • พร้อมพิไล บัวสุวรรณ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214164

Keywords:

Principal Leadership, Administration, Bangkok

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to create the Model equation of the
influences of principal leadership and mediating factors affecting the student learning
quality in primary schools under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration and to
investigate the correction of this Model also. This research was quantitative research.
The population groups in the research were including personnel involving the
educational field of the primary schools under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration
432 schools from 4 groups. They are 432 principals, 14,740 teachers, 216,770 students
and 3,456 committees of the network guardians; totally 235,398 personals. The
population of 432 schools through opening of Krejcie & Morgan’s table ; The sampling
groups 205 schools and the respondents were including 1 principal, 5 teachers and 4
committees of the network guardians; totally 10 personals. The questionnaire
instrument consisted of3 papers, the first part was asking the principals, the second
part was asking the teachers, each consisted of 7 parts and the third part for asking the
committees of the network guardians which consisted 5 parts. All questionnaires were
responded completely and also sent back. the results found that:
1. There were positive direct and indirect influence of model principals
leadership and total influence of teacher-professional community, learning climate in
school , ties–parent community, trust in school and classroom instruction towards
students’ learning quality.
2. The results of model correction has expressed that the pattern was agreed
with the empirical information and the Chi-square was 425.75, possibility (P) was 1.00 at
the df 652, Chi-square /df was 0.65, the agreement indicator(GFI) was 0.90 and the
aggregated agreement indicator (AGFI) was 0.89, the standardized RMR was 0.0043 and
RMSEA was 0.000.

References

Bousuwan, P. (2011). Families and
Schools : Partners for the quality
of the students.Bangkok Sangdow,
Publishing Limited.
Epstein,J.L. (1995). “School/family/
community partnerships: Caring
for the children we Share” Phi
Delta Kappan May: 701 – 702.
Freiberg, H. J. (1998).“ Measuring school
Climate : Let me count the
ways”. Educational Leadership.
56(1): 22-26. cited in Marshall, M.
L.2004. xamining School Climate:
Defining Factors and Educational
Influences University Center for
School Safety.
Hattie,J. (2011). Visible Learning: A
Synthesis of Over 800 MetaAnalyses Relating to Achievement.
Routledge: N.Y. Organization for
Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD). (2010). PISA
2009. Results: What Makes a
School Successful? OECD Publishing.
Ho, Sui-Chu. (2007).“ Building trust in
elementary schools: the impact
of home school community
collaboration”. International Journal
about Parent in Education. 1, 8-20.
Hoy, W.K., C. J. and L. Witkoskie. (1992).
Open School/Healthy Schools:
Measuring Organizational Climate,
Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
James Sebastian and Elaine Allensworth.
(2012). The Influence of Principal
Leadership on Student Learning
Quality: A study of Mediated
Pathways to Learning .Education
Administration Quarterly. The
University Council for Education
Administration. USA.
Khemmani, T. (2007). Science teaching:
the knowledge to manage the
learning process effective. (The
print 5) Bangkok, Office of the print
parade Chulalongkorn University.
Kittisaknawin, Ch. (2009). Trust in the
organization of the country. A
comparative study of public
sector organizations and private
sector enterprises. Thesis Ph.D.
Department of Public Administration,
Ramkumhang University.
Ministry of Education. (2008). The
measurement and evaluation
based on the core curriculum of
the Basic Education Curriculum
2008. Bangkok: Ladprao publishing.
Ministry of Education.( 2011). Core
Curriculum Education Basic
Edition 2008. Bangkok: ETO (ETO).
Molee, P. (2009). The analysis of the
causal relationship of the factors
that affect the leadership. School
administrators successful. Education
Doctoral Thesis Faculty of
Management Studies, Chulalongkorn
University.
Office of the Basic Education. (2010).The
guidelines focus on improving
the learner into practice. Bangkok.
Office of the Education Council, (2008).
The crisis of Thailand. Bangkok:
Partnership, V.T.C. Communications
applications
Office of the Education Council. (1999).
National Education 1999, improved
(Vol.2) 2002. Prik Hwan Graphics
company Limited.
Office of the Education Council. (2008).
The research of evaluated the
development of quality early
childhood (3 –5years). Bangkok:
Plearn studio.
Office of the National Education
Commission.(2011). Education Act
of 1999, improved (No. 2). BE
2002. Bangkok: Thaiwatana Panich.
Phopetch, A. (2012). Development
Indicators behavioral leadership
of the school administrators.
Basis. The thesis Ph.D. Faculty of
Management Studies, Siam University.
Plerin, G. (2009). Development Indicators
leadership for the management
of basic education. Education
Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Management
Studies, Khonkan University.
Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu,
S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing
schools for improvement lessons
from Chicago. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press.
Sopovitz, J., Sirinides, P., and May, H.
(2010). How Principals and Peers
Influence. Teaching and learning.
Educational Administration Quaterly,
46(1).
Sopovitz, J., Sirinides, P., and May, H..
(2006). “School Climate: The
Interplay Between Interpersonal
Relationships and Student
Achievement”. Journal of School
Leadership. 16(7): 11-14.
Srisaard, B. (2010). Initial research. (2nd
Edition).Bangkok: Suweeriyasart limit.
The National Institute of Educational
Testing Service (NIETS) (2011).
Guide to the study of basic
national Level2 (PS.6) and Level3
(m3). Year 2011, Bangkok.
The National Institute of Educational
Testing Service (NIETS) (2011).
Research report titled factors
causing the O-NET test scores of
students. Grade 6 and Grade 6
low. The National Institute of
Educational TestingService, Bangkok.
The Office of National Education
Standards and Quality Assessment .
(2007). The evaluation report
Outside the three levels of basic
education (2554-2558 BC).
Bangkok: Amarin Printing Ann.
Publishing Co., Ltd. (Thailand).
Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Trust in
schools: a conceptual and
empirical analysis”. Journal of
Educational Administration. 36(4),
334-352.
Wiruchchai, N. (1999). Model LISREL
statistical analysis for research.
Edition 3. Bangkok's Chulalongkorn
plublishing

Downloads

Published

03-09-2019

How to Cite

ศิลาขาว ว., & บัวสุวรรณ พ. (2019). The Influences of Principal Leadership and Mediating Factors Affecting Student Learning Quality in Primary Schools under Bangkok Metropolitan Administration. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 9(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214164