Relationships between factors and cognitive performance. Registered nurse in the collection of evidence.

Authors

  • อำภำรัตน์ อ่อนเปรี้ยว
  • ยุทธนา สุดเจริญ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214188

Keywords:

evidence collection, registered nurses

Abstract

The research purposes were to study personal factors, supporting factors,
knowledge, understanding and problems, which affected evidence collection in nursing
practices. The relationship between factors were studied for guideline in nursing
practices concerning medical laws related to evidence collection and records. Research
samples were registered nurses, who worked at the out-patient department Bhumibol
Adulyadej Hospital (n=82). Data collection was conducted from each subject with
questionnaires. In depth-interview with forensic experts (n=4) were conducted for data
interpretation. Results of each factor were presented as descriptive statistics, including
percentage mean, standard deviation, and the relationship among studied factors. The
results were analyzed by Peason’s correlation and presented as relation coefficient (r).
The findings show that registered nurses had good attitude and low experience
level concerning evidence collection pertaining to medical legal cases. In addition,
knowledge and attitude in relation to practice guideline of registered nurses were at
the highest levels. Evidence collection and law practice of registered nurses were at
high levels. There was relationship of almost all factors, except experience in evidence
collection (personal factor) had a negative correlation in knowledge and attitude
pertaining to law practice, which was significant, at a low level of relation (r=-.247,
p<0.05). This relationship corresponded to results from in-depth interviews, which
found that forensic nurses may find it necessary to inform and transfer evidence to
policemen. Knowledge, understanding, experience, and attitude concerning medicolegal
practices were improved in medico-legal care, and evidence collection of nurses.
Executive staff should be visited by expert organizations for collaboration.

References

Bountong T. (2001). The core competencies
of nurses and midwives1. National
Nursing Education Seminar papers 3
rd. Bangkok. Crime Suppression
Division. Investigation and evidence
associated. Bangkok: Administration
Investigation.
Donna M. Garbacz Bader, D. M., & Gabriel,
S. (2010). Forensic Nursing: a concise
manual. United States of America:
Taylor & Francis Group.
Ethics Committee. (2002). Promote
guidelines for ethical nursing
profession. Bangkok: Thailand
Nursing and Midwifery Council.
Hammer, R. M. Moynihan, B., & Pagliaro, E.
M. (2006). Forensic nursing: A
Handbook for practice. Massachusetts:
Jones and Bartlett publishers.
Ketsumpan Y. Quality nursing care
Conference papers. Bangkok: Siriraj
Hospital.
Kongkarnpayaban. (2001). Quality
assurance Nursing in hospital:
Nursing service in-patient department.
Bangkok: Office of Permanent Secretary.
Lynch, V. A. (2006). Forensic nursing.
Colorado: Mosby.
Robinson, D. & Kettles, A. (2000). Forensic
nursing and multidiscliplinary care of
the mentally disordered offender.
London: Tyne and Wear.
Saripan W. (2011). Guideline of nursing
procedure for evidence collection of
forensic patients in emergency
deparment Ramathipodi Hospital.
M.Sc, (Public health) Major in
Medicaland public health law
administration.
Wongsakulchean S.(2008). Scenario role
of forensic nurses. Master Thesis
Nursing Administration, Nursing,
Chulalongkorn University.

Downloads

Published

03-09-2019

How to Cite

อ่อนเปรี้ยว อ., & สุดเจริญ ย. (2019). Relationships between factors and cognitive performance. Registered nurse in the collection of evidence. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 9(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214188