Thai Politics according to the Masterplots (1932-2014)

Authors

  • เจษฎาภรณ์ อัจฉริโยภาส

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214209

Keywords:

Thai Politics, Masterplots, Absolute Monarchy, Hegemony, Progressives, Royalists

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to study the Thai politics after the period
of absolute monarchy from 1932 to 2014. The study explained the political history of
Thailand from the past to the tendency for the future according to the masterplots.
The findings of the study were as the following. The masterplots concerning the
competition for hegemony over the country’s constitutions between the progressives
as the protagonist and the royalists as the antagonist were conducted by the 5 plots
which developed under a set of foundational principles of story outline: exposition,
objective, confrontation, and ending (knockout power). They revealed that the
progressives could not have maintained so wide a hegemony over the country’s
constitutions since 1932 to 2014. It was because the “sovereignty of the people”
referred to in all of the country’s constitutions has completely not related with the
House of Representatives and the people’s political participation and the country’s
constitutions would be violated by a coup d'état which has been a part of the vicious
cycle that has ceaselessly occurred for 83 years.
In terms of the masterplots, the progressives had been the person being
influenced by an obligation, fighting to achieve a cherished ideal, assuming a role that
leads directly to catastrophe which oppressed them to make the supreme sacrifice, to
encounter situations whereby a wrong was righted, and finally to confront a puzzle
with no solution. Therefore, the theme of political history of Thailand from 1932-2014
was that “Where there is a will, there is not a way.” In addition and most importantly,
if the theme would not remain stable, the future of Thai politics would not have
occurred in the same way.

References

Cook, W. W.(1928) Plotto The Classic
Plot Suggestion Tool For Writers
of Creative Fiction. (U.S.A.: Norton
Creek Press, originally published
1928).
Eawsriwong, N. (2000). Rattanakosin
History in Ayudhya Chronical. 3rd
Ed. Bangkok: Matichon Publishing
House. (in Thai).
Kasetsiri, Ch. (2006). Political History of
Thailand 1932-1957. 2nd Ed.
Bangkok: The Foundation for the
Promotion of Social Sciences and
Humanities Textbooks Project.
Ruankaew.
Phongpaichit, P. and Baker, Ch. (1999).
Setthakit kanmuang thai samai
krungthep. 2nd Ed.
Prompanjai, A. (2015). The Thai
bureaucratic polity during the
general Prem Tinsulanonda period:
The problems of semi-democratic
regime (1980 -1988). Journal of
Social Sciences, Faculty of Political
Science, Chulalongkorn University
Vol. 45 No 2 (Jul-Dec2015), 77. (in
Thai) Publishing. (in Thai).
Sathitniramai, A. (2013). Ratthai kub
karnpatiroob settakij chak
kamnerd toonniyom naitanakarn
toong wikrit settakij 1997.
Bangkok: Samesky Books. (in Thai).
Sattayanurak, A. (1987). The
Transformation of Historical
Consciousness and the Changes
in Thai Society from the Reign of
King Mongkut to 1932 A.D.
(Thesis). Bangkok: Department of
History, Chulalongkorn University.
(in Thai).
Sawyer, T. & Weingarten, A.D., Plots
Unlimited. (Malibu, California:
Ashleywilde, 2004). Tropics of
Discourse: Essays in Cultural
Criticism. Johns Hopkins University
Press,Baltimore and London, USA
and UK 1987. Silkworm Books. (in
Thai).
Well,J.S. Plot & Structure. (OH, USA:
Writer’s Digest Books. 2004).
Winichakul, Th. (2001). “History Study on
Postmodern” in
Luamkotngaokorpoapaendin.
Bangkok: Matichon Publishing
House. (in Thai).

Downloads

Published

03-09-2019

How to Cite

อัจฉริโยภาส เ. (2019). Thai Politics according to the Masterplots (1932-2014). Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 9(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v9i2.214209