Factors Affecting Students’Academic Achievement in Asset Accountingon Property Plant Equipment and Its Depreciation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53848/irdssru.v8i1.214746Keywords:
Academic Achievement, class room environment, learning performanceAbstract
The purposes of this research were: 1) to study classroom environment variables that affect academic achievement; and 2) to study learning performance variables that affect academic achievement. The research samples were 110 second year students of Bangkok University enrolled in the Asset Accounting Course in Semester 1/2015. This survey research used a questionnaire as an instrument for data collection. Statistical instruments employed to test researchhypotheses included mean, standard deviation,Pearson productmoment correlation, and multiple regression analysis.
The findings were as follows:
1) Mean of the classroom environment variables showed the highest level, at 3.24 (out of 4), and SD was at 0.29, followed by the learning performance variables which were also rated significantly high at 3.16,. and SD was at 0.39.
2) The classroom environment and learning performance variables were positively correlated to the academic achievement with significance level (r = 0.72, p<0.05). These two types of variables could significantly explain the results of students’ academic achievement at the percentage of 51 (with p<0.05).
According to the findings, it is suggested that teachers should motivate students to interact with their classmates by sharing their ideas in group discussions and to empower individuals of their potential as well as to encourage them to make full effort on their work. In addition, teachers should be more friendly with learners in order to make them relax and involve themselves in group discussions where learning can consolidate.
References
(2007). Pedagogical Affect, Student
Interest, and Learning Performance.
Journal of Business Research, 60,
960-964.
Bandura, A. (1978). The Self System in
Reciprocal Determinism. American
Psychologist, 33(4), 344 - 358.
Brown, I. M. & Posner, B. Z. (2001).
Exploring the Relationships
Between Learning and Leadership.
Leadership & Organization
Development Journal, 22(6), 274-
280..
Cardoso, A. P., Ferreira, M., Abrantes, J. L.,
Seabra, C., & Costa, C. (2011).
Personal and Pedagogical
Interaction Factors as
Determinants of Academic
Achievement. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1596-
1605. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.sbspro.2011.11.402
Costa, C., Cardoso, A. P., Lima, M. P.,
Ferreira,M., & Abrantes, J. L. (2015).
Pedagogical Interaction and
Learning Performance As
Determinants of Academic
Achievement. Procedia - Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 874-
881. doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.1
1.402
Culatta, R. (2011). Innovative
Learning.Retrieved November 14,
2015, from
http://www.innovativelearning.com
/teaching/social_learning_theory.ht
ml
Dempsey, M., Halton, C., & Murphy, M.
(2001).Reflective Learning in
Social Work Education:
Scaffolding the Process.Social
Work Education, 20(6), 631-641.
Frontczak N. T. (1998). A Paradigm for
the Selection, Use and
Development of Experiential
Learning Activities in Marketing
Education. Marketing Education
Review, 8(3), 25–33.
Hay, A., Hodgkinson, M., Peltier, J. W., &
Drago, W. A. (2004). Interaction
and virtual learning. Strategic
Change, 13(4), 193-204.
Ma, X. & Klinger, D. A. (2000).
Hierarchical linear modeling of
student and school effects on
academic achievement. Canadian
Journal of Education, 25(1), 41-55.
Marks, R. B. (2000). Determinants of
Student Evaluations of Global
Measures of Instructor and
Course value. Journal of Marketing
Education, 22(2), 108–119.
Paswan, K. A. & Young, J. A. (2002).
Student Evaluation of Instructor: A
Nomological nvestigation Using
Structural Equation Modeling.
Journal of Marketing Education, 24 (3),
193 – 202.
Vasile, C., Marhan, A.-M., Singer, F. M., &
Stoicescu, D. (2011). Academic
self-efficacy and cognitive load
in students. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 12, 478-482.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.201
1.02.059
Webster, J. & Hackley, P. (1997). Teaching
Effectiveness in TechnologyMediated Distance Learning. The
Academy of Management Journal,
40(6), 1282-1309.
Willemse, M., Lunenberg, M., & Korthagen,
F. (2005). Values in Education: A
Challenge for Teacher
Educators.Teaching and Teacher
Education, 21(2), 205-217.
Woerkom, M. V. (2004). The concept of
critical reflection and its
implications for human resource
development. Advances in
Developing Human Resources, 6(2),
178-192.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว

