Deliberative Democracy, Good Governance and Community Problem Solving: a Case Study of Klongkoo Village, Muang District, Phitsanulok Province

Authors

  • วัลลภัช สุขสวัสดิ์
  • ปริญญา สร้อยทอง
  • สุทธิชัย ยังสุข

Keywords:

deliberative democracy, good governance, community problem solving

Abstract

                This study was a Participatory Action Research (PAR) which highly emphasized a collaboration of many sectors to solve community problems.  The main objective was to solve problems from public service delivery in the community by employing deliberative democracy and the principle of good governance. Four crucial tools, which were expected to promote the principles of deliberative democracy and good governance, were employed in the research process. These were: 1) a form to evaluate dissatisfaction in public service delivery; 2) people scorecard; 3) budget literacy; and 4) problem solving by collective cooperation. Frequency and measures of central tendency were used for quantitative data analysis. Analytic induction was used for qualitative data analysis to interpret and create conclusions based on data obtained from research tools. It was found that the problems of teenagers’ driving motorcycles regardless of safety in the matter of life and property of others at night, and drugs problem, as agreed by the community, were highly critical and needed to be solved urgently. To solve these problems, people and governmental sectors need to correctively cooperate for making community rules, regulations, and practices for sustainable problem solving. Proposals to the government could be made as this study suggests. The governmental agencies could apply the research tools in the process of policy making and policy implementation. It is hoped that government agencies will be able to solve problems and respond to people's needs more efficiently.

References

References
Agere, S. (2000). Promoting Good Governance: Principles, Practices and Perspectives
(Vol. 11): Commonwealth Secretariat.
Björkman, M., & Svensson, J. (2009). Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 735-769.
Bowornwathana, B. (2000). Governance Reform in Thailand: Questionable Assumptions, Uncertain Outcomes. Governance, 13(3), 393-408.
Dryzek, J. S. (2002). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations: Oxford University Press on Demand.
Freeman, S. (2000). Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comment. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 29(4), 371-418.
Graham, J., Plumptre, T. W., & Amos, B. (2003). Principles for Good Governance in the 21st century: Institute on governance Ottawa.
Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2009). Why Deliberative Democracy? : Princeton University Press.
Inayatullah, S. (2006). Anticipatory Action Learning: Theory and Practice. Futures, 38(6), 656-666.
Johnson, P. (2004). Analytic Induction. Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, 165, 179.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research: Springer Science & Business Media.
Lockwood, M. (2010). Good Governance for Terrestrial Protected Areas: A Framework, Principles and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(3), 754-766.
Rodgers, D. T. (2001). Stories, Games, and Deliberative Democracy. The Journal of American History, 88(2), 444-452.
Sanchez Betancourt, D. & Vivier, E. (2019) Action and Community-Based Research: Improving Local Governance Practices Through the Community Scorecard. In: Laher, S., Fynn, A. & Kramer, S. (eds). Transforming Research Methods in the Social Sciences: Case Studies from South Africa. Johannesburg: Wits University Press. 375-391.
Van Doeveren, V. (2011). Rethinking Good Governance: Identifying Common Principles. Public Integrity, 13(4), 301-318.
Warren, M. E. (1996). Deliberative Democracy and Authority. The American Political Science Review, 90(1), 46-60.
Weithman, P. J. (1995). Contractualist Liberalism and Deliberative Democracy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 314-343.
Krongkamol S. (2006). The Role of Subdistrict Administrative Organizations in Environment and Health Promotion within the Community : a Case Study of Thapho Municipality. Public Administration, Naresuan University.
Tossapol J. (2009). State, Problems and Needs to Solve Basic Needs for Community Development Planning Around Naresuan University, Tha Pho Subdistrict, Mueang District, Phitsanulok Province. (Public Administration), Naresuan University.
Parinya S.& Somsak S. (2012). A Study of Good Municipality Management in Thailand. Journal of Research for Development (Humanities and Social Sciences), 5(1), 91-100.
Panya Chayajindawong and Ratchanee Pootrakul. (2001). Good Governance and Thai Society. Excutive Journal, 21(2), 28-32.
Sathithorn T. & Wichuda S. (2014). Public policy Development Through the Process of Deliberative Democracy: Some Concepts, Forms and Observations. Journal of New Management, 12(2), 1-14.
Sathithorn T. (2016). Deliberative democracy Bangkok : King Prajadhipok's Institute
Suchada R. (2002). Action learning: Bangkok : Office of the Civil Service Commission.

Downloads

Published

31-12-2019

How to Cite

สุขสวัสดิ์ ว., สร้อยทอง ป., & ยังสุข ส. (2019). Deliberative Democracy, Good Governance and Community Problem Solving: a Case Study of Klongkoo Village, Muang District, Phitsanulok Province. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 11(2). retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/irdssru/article/view/233389

Issue

Section

Research Articles