Problems in Taking the TOEIC Listening Test among 4th Business English Students at Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University

Authors

  • Wanwipang Phonkamjad Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University
  • Kanaporn Kaewkamjan Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University
  • Viyada Promchitta Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University
  • Jiraporn Sukkrong Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University
  • Wichien Phanon Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University
  • Nanthanut Wiangin Faculty of Education and Educational Innovation, Kalasin University

Keywords:

Listening problems, Listening skills, Listening test, TOEIC test

Abstract

Although listening skills are essential in English language learning and standardized testing, students who study English as a foreign language often achieve low scores. Research in this area remains limited, particularly regarding the TOEIC listening test. This action research aims to examine the problems encountered in TOEIC listening tests among fourth-year Business English majors at Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University in the academic year 2022. The sample group consisted of seven fourth-year students and one instructor. The research instruments included three sets of TOEIC listening tests, answer sheets, listening problem record forms, and interview forms.

The findings revealed two main categories of problems. Content-related issues included insufficient vocabulary and grammar knowledge, difficulty comprehending complex sentences, business-specific terminology, and diverse accents. Emotional issues encompassed anxiety, fatigue, and lack of concentration. While the instructor identified similar content-related problems, emotional issues were not mentioned. The recommendation suggests utilizing these identified problems to develop training programs aimed at improving students' TOEIC listening test scores.

References

Chuma, T., & Bulsathaporn, A. (2017). Communication strategies used by university students to cope with speaking and listening problems. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 7(2), 181–194. Retrieved from https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/humanjubru/article/view/206632 (In Thai)

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16802fc1bf

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Donkuanchao, K. (2022). Developing English speaking skills and learning vocabulary by learning management based on teaching language concept for communication via YouTube video of grade 6 students. Master’s thesis, Mahasarakham University. Retrieved from http://202.28.34.124/dspace/bitstream/123456789/1652/1/63010580008.pdf (In Thai)

Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Geddes, A. J. (2016). Korean university students’ attitudes and motivation towards studying English. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(4), 704–715. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040407

Jack, R., & Rodgers, S. T. (2002). Approach and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Liu, T. Y. (2014). Washback effects of the TOEIC examination: A study of adult learner’s attitudes toward English exams, learning and teaching in a TOEIC preparation class. Retrieved from http://ir.lib.cyut.edu.tw:8080/handle/310901800/23125

Lougheed, L. (2018). Barron's TOEIC (6th ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Barron's Educational Series.

Nguyen, H. H. T., & Tran, T. T. N. (2018). An investigation into EFL teachers’ perceptions of in-class English speaking assessment. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4251

Office of the Education Council. (2020). Active competency-based learning management. Bangkok: Prigwan Graphic. (In Thai)

Prince of Songkla University. (2016). PSU announcement: Standards and guidelines for English language proficiency testing for bachelor's degree programs. Retrieved from http://edu.fms.psu.ac.th/images/Data_Pr/criterionENG2559.pdf

Qamili, S. (2016). The process of learning English speaking skills. European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(2), 440–450. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3597/d55918f0fab9a9daa470ab6d0f95c98e8596.pdf

Soransathaporn, S. (2017). English learning strategies of Thai learners in Thailand 4.0 era. Academic Journal of Thonburi University, 11(26), 9–23. Retrieved from http://www.thonburi-u.ac.th/Journal/Document/11-26/Journal11_26_1.pdf (In Thai)

Wang, X. (2023). Research on the integration model and effect of ideological and political education in blended teaching curriculum based on PDCA. Journal of Educational Development, 10, 74–81.

Wangmanee, P., & Vongtangswad, M. (2022). Effectiveness of the potential promoting strategies on the TOEIC test of English major students, Chiang Rai Rajabhat University. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(1), 40–60. Retrieved from https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jhuso/article/view/1173 (In Thai)

Wankong, A. (2020). Developing English communication skills in the 21st century according to CEFR framework. Journal of Humanities, Mahamakut Buddhist University, 7(2), 303–314. Retrieved from http://ojs.mbu.ac.th/index.php/johu/article/view/1567 (In Thai)

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Phonkamjad, W. ., Kaewkamjan, K. ., Promchitta, V. ., Sukkrong, J. ., Phanon, W. ., & Wiangin, N. . (2025). Problems in Taking the TOEIC Listening Test among 4th Business English Students at Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University. Research and Development Journal Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, 17(1), 117–131. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/irdssru/article/view/277235

Issue

Section

Research Articles