Scenario of Social Entrepreneurship Curricula in Thailand
Keywords:
Scenario, Curriculum development, Social EntrepreneurshipAbstract
This research aimed to explore the scenario of social entrepreneurship curricula in Thailand. The study involved interviewing experts, including educators and practitioners in social entrepreneurship, to gain insights into the future direction of these curricula. Semi-structured interviews were utilized as the primary research tool. The data were analyzed using content analysis, where information from interviews with experts was interpreted and categorized into key components. The findings are summarized as follows:
The results identified seven key aspects: (1) Challenges and obstacles in business operations, where most social entrepreneurs lacked knowledge and expertise in business management; (2) Solutions to business challenges, with most social entrepreneurs opting to enroll in short-term training courses to enhance their knowledge; (3) Content for teaching, which was divided into two parts: core business administration and social entrepreneurship-specific subjects; (4) Teaching and learning methods, which predominantly used an active learning approach, emphasizing hands-on practices; (5) Teaching materials, including visual aids from both domestic and international sources, such as static images, video clips, or guest lecturers by social entrepreneurs; (6) Assessment and evaluation using tools such as tests, business plan design for social enterprises, and portfolio creation, with a higher weight placed on practical skills in designing and solving social business issues than on cognitive knowledge assessments; and (7) Curriculum development for social entrepreneurship in Thailand, which was proposed in three formats: 1) short-term courses and bachelor’s degree programs, 2) short-term courses only, and 3) bachelor’s degree programs.
References
Alourhzal, H., & Hattabou, A. (2021). Social entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of curricula contents and teaching methods. African Scientific Journal, 3(7), 001. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5651821
Amundam, D. N. (2019). Enhancing potential social innovative thinking, responsible, social entrepreneurship education: A curriculum content and teaching method model. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(5), 1–21. Retrieved from https://www.abacademies.org/abstract/enhancing-potential-social-innovative-thinking-responsible-social-entrepreneurship-education-a-curriculum-content-and-te-8516.html
Bjerke, B. (2007). Understanding entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar.
Bloom, G. M. (2006). The social entrepreneurship collaboratory (SE lab): A university incubator for a rising generation of social entrepreneurs. In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social entrepreneurship: New models of sustainable social change (pp. 270–306). Oxford University Press.
Brock, D., & Steiner, S. (2009). Social entrepreneurship education: Is it achieving the desired aims? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1344419
Brown, R. B. (1994). Reframing the competency debate: Management knowledge and meta-competence in graduate education. Management Learning, 25(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076942520
Capella-Peris, C., Gil-Gómez, J., Martí-Puig, M., & Ruíz-Bernardo, P. (2020). Development and validation of a scale to assess social entrepreneurship competency in higher education. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1545686
Chareonwongsak, K. (2007). Opening a new course? Social entrepreneurship? Retrieved from https://www.kriengsak.com/node/137 (In Thai)
Cindrić, M., Miljković, D., & Strugar, V. (2010). Didaktika i kurikulum. University of Zagreb.
Colom, R., & Flores-Mendoza, C. (2001). Inteligencia y memoria de trabajo: La relación entre factor G, complejidad cognitiva y capacidad de procesamiento. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 17(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-37722001000100007
Edwards-Schachter, M., García-Granero, A., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Quesada-Pineda, H., & Amara, N. (2015). Disentangling competences: Interrelationships on creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 16, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.11.006
Gonxalez, A. G., & Montoya, M. S. R. (2021). Social entrepreneurship education: Changemaker training at the university. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(5), 1236–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-01-2021-0009
Kedmenec, I. (2015). The impact of individual, social and cultural factors on the social entrepreneurial intentions of business students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maribor. Retrieved from https://dk.um.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=47354&lang=eng
Kedmenec, I., Rebernik, M., & Perić, J. (2015). The impact of individual characteristics on intentions to pursue social entrepreneurship. Ekonomski pregled, 66(2), 119–137. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/139350
Kickul, J., Griffiths, M., Bacq, S., & Garud, N. (2018). Catalyzing social innovation: Is entrepreneurial bricolage always good?. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3–4), 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2017.1413771
Kiper, H., & Mischke, W. (2008). Uvod u opću didaktiku. Educa Nakladno Društvo d.o.o.
Kitnuntaviwat, V. (2023). Principles of business education (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. (In Thai)
Konecki, I., Toplek, A., & Detelj, K. (2022). Social entrepreneurship education at Croatian universities. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 30(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v30i3.1988
Le Deist, F. D., & Winterton, J. (2005). What is competence?. Human Resource Development International, 8(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367886042000338227
Lynch, M., Kamovich, U., Longva, K. K., & Steinert, M. (2021). Combining technology and entrepreneurial education through design thinking: Students’ reflections on the learning process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, Article 120483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.015
Othman, N., Mohammad, R., & Rahman, R. S. A. R. (2017). Entrepreneurial competency and tendencies among pre-university students. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(15), 51–67. Retrieved from https://serialsjournals.com/abstract/87022_4.pdf
Poljak, V. (1970). Didaktika. Školska knjiga.
Robinson, J. (2006). Navigating social and institutional barriers to markets: How social entrepreneurs identify and evaluate opportunities. In Social entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_7
Roslan, M. H., Hamid, S., Ijab, M. T., & Bukhari, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship learning model in higher education using social network analysis. International Conference Computer Science and Engineering, 1339, 012029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1339/1/012029
Shahverdi, M., Ismail, K., & Qureshi, M. I. (2018). The effect of perceived barriers on social entrepreneurship intention in Malaysian universities: The moderating role of education. Management Science Letters, 8(5), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.4.014
Thailand Social Enterprise 50 Research Team. (2012). Thailand social enterprise 50. Bangkok: Bangkokbiznews Publishing Bizbook. (In Thai)
Vuković, K., Kedmenec, I., & Detelj, K. (2017). Discourse of social entrepreneurs in Croatia. In K. M. Veysel (Ed.), 5th RSEP Social Science Conference Proceedings (pp. 13–19). Sanat Kırtasiye Reklamcılık Ltd.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว

