Evaluation of Bachelor of Technical Education Program in Production and Industrial Engineering (revised edition 2017)
Keywords:
CIPPIEST Model, Bachelor of Industrial Education program, Curriculum EvaluationAbstract
The objectives of this research were to 1) evaluate the Bachelor of Industrial Education program in Production and Industrial Engineering (revised curriculum in 2017), Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok 2) To study recommendations for the evaluation of the Bachelor of Industrial Education program in Production and Industrial Engineering (revised curriculum in 2017). Four groups of informants in the CIPPIEST Model assessment research: 1) Four branch instructors, 2) forty-four students, 3) thirteen graduates, and 4) nine proprietors, along with one educational representative. The tools used in the research were questionnaires. The statistics used in the research are: 1) content accuracy, 2) confidence in the instrument, 3) frequency, 4) percentage, 5) mean, 6) standard deviation.
The results showed that 1) the overall contextual curriculum was at a moderate level, 2) input was at a moderate Level, 3) process was at a high level, 4) productivity was at a high level, 5) impact was at a high level, 6) effectiveness was at a high level. 7) sustainability feedback was at a high level. 8) Knowledge transfer is at a high level. The recommendation is to add tools suitable for specific subjects and increase the course to cover students with specific interests.
References
Boonpoo, S., & Chaisuk, P. (2015). The Curriculum Evaluation on Doctor of Buddhist Educational Administration,Department of Educational Administration, Faculty of Education, Mahachulalongkornrajvidyalaya University. Journal of Educational Review Faculty of Education in MCU, 2(3), 1-15. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ EDMCU/article/view/144378/106907 (In Thai)
Buasri, T. (1999). Curriculum Theory: Curriculum Design and Development. Bangkok: Pattanasuksa Printing (In Thai).
Bunklang, A., & Panjiang, P. (2023). Using of CIPPIEST Model for Prathomsuksa Curriculum Evaluation of Banprangmoo (Sriwit Suksa) School Mueang District Phatthalung Province. Journal of MCU Ubon Review, 8(2), 257-266. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/mcjou/article/view/267061/179005 (In Thai)
Fongsri, P. (2013). Educational Assessment: From Concept to Practice. Bangkok: Darnsutha Press (In Thai).
Hemapandha, C. (2018). An Evaluation of Master Education Program in Curriculum and Instructional Development Revised edition 2013CE Using CIPP Evaluation Model. Narkbhutparitat Journal Nakhon Si Thammarat Rajabhat University, 10(s), 213-221. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/nakboot/article/view/124871/108999 (In Thai)
Hungsapuck, C., Ponathong, C., & Yongsorn, C. (2020). The Assessment of International Curriculum on Business Administration of the Private Higher Education Institutions. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 8(6), 2363-2376. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/journal-peace/article/view/241416/168000 (In Thai)
Internal Quality Assurance Committee at the Highest Education Level. (2014). Internal Quality Assurance Handbook for Higher Education, B.E. 2557. Bangkok: Parbpim Press (In Thai).
Jantree, C., & Sripradit, A. (2019). Evaluation of Bachelor of Science in Technical Education Program in Production and Industrial Engineering of Faculty of Technical Education, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 12(2), 655-671. Retrieved from https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/ Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/158706/146604 (In Thai)
King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok. (2018). Faculty of Technical Education. Retrieved from https://www.kmutnb.ac.th/faculty-and-agencies/bangkok/faculty-of-technical-education.aspx (In Thai)
Klinsuwan, P. (2020). Evaluation of the Ph.D. curriculum in Social Welfare Administration. Journal of Social Synergy, 11(1), 74-87. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/thaijss/article/view/213860/165860 (In Thai)
Pongkunsorn, J., Chaichompu, P., Janchaiyaphum, B., & Wichayarotdumri, N. (2017). an Evaluation of Graduate Diploma Program in Teacher Profession (Revised 2014), Faculty of Education, Santapol College. Nakhon Phanom University Journal, 7(3), 106-114. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/npuj/article/view/87473/85857 (In Thai)
Ruangrit, N., Thammeta, T., Bangthamai, E., & Satiman, A. (2002). an Evaluation of Master of Education Program in Educational Technology (Revised 2561 B.E.), Faculty of Education, Silpakorn University. Silpakorn Educational Research Journal, 14(2), 233-252. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/suedureasearchjournal/article/view/259420/175988 (In Thai)
Sonchan, C., Sirikase, B., Sod-ium, P., Podapol, C., & Pongsiri, P. (2019). Evaluation of Curriculum for Master of Education Program in Educational Administration at Mahamakut Buddhist University. Journal of Graduate School Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, 16(73), 88-97. Retrieved from https://so02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SNGSJ/article/view/109244/138630 (In Thai)
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2015). For applying CIPP evaluation model checklist: A tool the CIPP model to assess projects and programs. Retrieved from Western Michigan University: http://rszarf.ips.uw.edu.pl/ewalps/dzienne/cipp-model-stufflebeam2015.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของ สถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา
ข้อความที่ปรากฏในบทความแต่ละเรื่องในวารสารวิชาการเล่มนี้เป็นความคิดเห็นส่วนตัวของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านไม่เกี่ยวข้องกับมหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฎสวนสุนันทา และคณาจารย์ท่านอื่นๆในมหาวิทยาลัยฯ แต่อย่างใด ความรับผิดชอบองค์ประกอบทั้งหมดของบทความแต่ละเรื่องเป็นของผู้เขียนแต่ละท่าน หากมีความผิดพลาดใดๆ ผู้เขียนแต่ละท่านจะรับผิดชอบบทความของตนเองแต่ผู้เดียว

