Analysis of The Forest Watershed Conservation Community of Mae O Tai with Arne Naess’s Concept of Deep Ecology.
Keywords:
Arne Naess, Deep ecology, Forest Watershed Conservation, Community of Mae Oae TaiAbstract
This study aims to research the Deep ecology of Arne Naess's concept The Forest Watershed Conservation Community of Mae O Tai and an analysis of The Forest Watershed Conservation Community of Mae O Tai with the concept of Deep ecology of Arne Naess. The study found that general ecology study about natural truth in tangible facts but do not study in value. So nature is reduced by human valuation. While Deep ecology is a concept that reject the idea of separating man from the environment. In addition, deep ecology also proposes the principle of equality in that all forms of life are equal and have the right to achieve their goals.
Deep ecological concepts in line with Arne Naess's concept that man is one with nature, everything is in the same vein and can not be separated. Nature must be respected and accepted by humans as equality because of the value of self, human beings should adapt their ideas and actions to nature. Refrain from destroying other creatures and natural for a consistent and complementary lifestyle.
The concept of forest conservation of community of Mae O Tai is different from Arne Naess's idea. They thinks human supernature and they are a controller. While Arne Naess values all life equally. However, the lifestyle of community of Mae O Tai is in line with the deep ecology concept of life at Arne Naess has proposed which is simple and And in harmony with nature.
References
Arne Naess. (1973). The Shallow and the Deep; Long-Range Ecology Movement. Inquiry. 16: pp. 95-100.
Arne Naess. (1993). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bunyanet, Nuangnoi. (1994). Environmental Ethics: Worldview in Buddhist Phi- losophy and Western Philosophy. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Cho̜ phaka, Koson. (1999). A Buddhist Paradigm on Deep Ecology. Master’s the- sis. Comparative religion, Mahidol University.
Hirunwong, Tassanee. (2003). Transfer of ecological wisdom of Karen people. In the area of Doi Inthanon National Park. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Inthongpan, Prawet. (2016). Buddhism and Environment. Bangkok: Kasetsart University Press.
Jaifai, Piyamas. (2009). Satish Kumar’s concept of spiritual ecology. Master of Art. Philosophy. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Naess Arne. (1969). Scepticism. New York: Humanities Press.
Phromduang, Thanat. (2007). Learning process in water shortage management in Mae Suek Sub-watershed, Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Phuphakdee, Kanmanee. (2004). Meaning and value of life in the deep ecology of Arne Naess. Master of Arts. Philosophy, Chiang Mai University.
Simongkhon, Kriangsak. (2012). Political and economic movemenic of corn far- mer group in Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province. Master of Political Science. Politics and Government. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Sumettikoon Piyaboot. (2008). The Ecoterrorist’s perception on nature and natural protection. Master of Art. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Thirachamnong, Phianloet. (2000). Participation of Community for The Forest Watershed Conservation in Mae Sanga upstream area Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province. Master of Art. Man and Environmental Management. Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of article published in Panidhana Journal is owned by "Panidhana" and its licensors
You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journalphilrecmu@gmail.com
