The Rejection of the Afterlife in Perspective of Ajita Kesakambala

Abstract

The purpose of this academic article is to analyze the concept of Ajita Kesakambala, specifically focusing on his rejection of the idea of an afterlife. The article is divided into four parts: Part 1 critiques Ajita Kesakambala's concept, pointing out its weaknesses. It thoroughly examines and interprets the concept, and suggests methods for presenting it in a more reasonable manner to address the gaps in the discussion.  Part 2 discusses the historical debate between Ajita Kesakambala and Buddhist philosophy regarding the afterlife, indicating that Ajita Kesakambala's rejection of the afterlife is rooted in materialism. Part 3 uses accidentalism to support Ajita Kesakambala's rejection of the afterlife. Finally, Part 4 explains that disbelief in the afterlife does not conflict with ethical values, as Ethical or unethical actions are determined by one's conscience, which is guided by a love for goodness and a detestation of evil. This internal moral compass is more influential than a belief in the afterlife. In addition, it offers a reason that the concept of Ajita Kesakambala is materialism. It does not emphasize mind, viewing life as merely a mechanism of matter. Despite this, Individuals who believe in his ideas may fear persecution and punishment, leading them to prioritize performing good deeds.