Thai Cross-dresser's Agency through Hannah Arendt Perspective
Keywords:
Subject, Agency, Actions, Private Realm, Public RealmAbstract
This article is part of research on Thai Cross-dresser's Agency through Hannah Arendt Perspective. The objective is to analyze the agency of Thai crossdressers in Hannah Arendt perspective on private and public realm. By examining relevant research documents and interviewing a group of crossdressers who are men yet have a preference in dressing as women. The research found that their agency is their ability to act through a body dressed as a woman, and this body becomes a living subject and has the ability to live independently in both private and public. And the subject who dresses as a woman is a new life. This is the result of learning the different conditions between masculinity in the body and femininity in clothing, women's situation and the people who interact with them as a woman. The research results are similar to Arendt's argument. The research found that within the private space, crossdressing agency can emerge and operate independently. Within the public space, they can act conditionally under the circumstances or social environment where they bring their bodies dressed as women to socialize.
References
ปิยลักษณ์ โพธิวรรณ์. (2554). คนข้ามเพศ : ตัวตน วัฒนธรรมย่อย และพื้นที่ทางสังคม. Damrong Journal,
-125.
พรเทพ แพรขาว, นฤพนธ์ ด้วงวิเศษ, สหะโรจน์ กิตติมหาเจริญ, สุระ อินตามูล และสุไรพร ชลวิไล. (2556).
เพศหลากเฉดสี : พหุวัฒนธรรมทางเพศในสังคมไทย = Cultural pluralism and sex/gender diversity in Thailand. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ศูนย์มานุษยวิทยาสิรินธร (องค์การมหาชน).
พิศาล มุกดารัศมี. (2561). Vita Activa : การรื้อฟื้น "มนุษย์สภาวะ" ของฮันนาห์ อาเรนดท์. กรุงเทพมหานคร:
Illuminations Editions.
สุไลพร ชลวิไล และ อโนพร เครือแตง. (2562). เพศแห่งสยาม: ประวัติศาสตร์ความหลากหลายทางเพศ.
กรุงเทพมหานคร: ภาพพิมพ์.
AgeUK. (2023, July). ageuk. Retrieved from Trans issues and later life :
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/ageuk/documents/factsheets/fs16_trans_issues_a
nd_later_life_fcs.pdf
Alberta L Reynolds Ms and Sandra L. Caron. (2000). How Intimate Relationships Are Impacted
When Heterosexual Men Crossdress. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality , 66-77.
Allen, A. (2002). Power, Subjectivity, and Agency: Between Arendt and Foucault. International
Journal of Philosophical Studies, 131-149.
Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. United States: University of Chicago Press.
Ballesteros, A. (2018). Hannah Arendt: from Property to Capital … and Back? Archiv für Rechts-
und Sozialphilosophie , 184-201.
Beemyn, B. G. (2004). Cross-Dressing. Retrieved from www.glbtqarchive.com:
http://www.glbtqarchive.com/ssh/cross_dressing_ssh_S.pdf
Bignall, S. (2010). Postcolonial Agency: Critique and Constructivism. United Kingdom: Edinburgh
University Press.
Canovan, M. (1985). POLITICS AS CULTURE: HANNAH ARENDT AND THE PUBLIC REALM.
History of Political Thought, 617-642.
Cremin, C. (2017). Man-Made Woman The Dialectics of Cross-Dressing. Pluto Press.
Farooq, Q. (2020). Eroticism and Mysteries of Cross-Dressing: Increasing Trends of Male to
Female Cross-Dressing in Pakistani Society. European Scientific Journal, 90-101.
HAVELKOVÁ, H. (1996). Ignored But Assumed. Family and Gender Between Public and Private
Realm. Czech Sociological Review, 63-79.
Joseph Kling. (1995). Review: Structure, Agency, and Marxist Understandings of the City. Vol. 57,
No. 1 (Winter, 1995), pp. 143-14
Thuma, A. (2011). Hannah Arendt, Agency, and the Public Space. IWM Junior Visiting Fellows’
Conference Proceedings, Vol. XXIX (pp. 1-9). IWM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 PANIDHANA JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of article published in Panidhana Journal is owned by "Panidhana" and its licensors
You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journalphilrecmu@gmail.com
