เมยูติกแบบขยายเชิงพุทธ : รูปแบบการใช้เหตุผลในบทสนทนาต่อปัญหาอภิปรัชญา ในคัมภีร์มิลินทปัญหา
Keywords:
มิลินทปัญหา ปัญหาอภิปรัชญา การสนทนาเพื่อการโน้มน้าว การสนทนาอย่างบัณฑิตAbstract
The objectives of this research are to (1) investigate the role of maieutics in Douglas N. Walton's theory of persuasive dialogue and (2) analyze the concept of maieutic as it is used in scholastic dialogue in the Milindapañha.
The results suggest that the functions of maieutics in persuasive dialogue exhibit the following characteristics: (1) the interlocutor offers opportunities for questioning to clarify their own opinions; (2) the underlying ideas behind both parties' positions are revealed; and (3) the maieutic process advances as an increasing number of fundamental beliefs shaping the speaker's opinions are disclosed. These functions are present in both types of conversation and are sufficient for the success of persuasive dialogue, as its outcome does not necessarily involve one party winning or altering its ideological stance,but rather achieving a closer understanding of one's own and the interlocutor's reasoning.
Nevertheless, these three maieutic functions are insufficient to address the metaphysical questions in the Milindapañha. The scholarly discourse is significantly advanced toward its objective as a result of the additional functions of Buddhist maieutics. These include: (4) the use of analogical questioning, a method that is not present in persuasive dialogues; (5) the direct exposure of inconsistencies (niggaha) in metaphysical reasoning; (6) the facilitation of the recognition of contradictions within one's own position, which ultimately leads to a transformation of belief; and (7) the establishment that the resolution in scholarly dialogue is not merely an agreed-upon opinion between interlocutors but rather an answer grounded in traces of Buddhist teachings as the primary criterion. The defining characteristics of scholastic dialogue are these additional functions of maieutics, which serve as the foundation of reasoning that enables the successful resolution of metaphysical questions in the Milindapañha.
References
ไชยวัฒน์ กปิลกาญจน์, ผู้แปล. (2538). มิลินทปัญหา เล่มที่ 1. กรุงเทพฯ: มูลนิธิปราณี สำเริงราชย์.
มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย. (2539). พระไตรปิฎกภาษาไทย ฉบับมหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย เล่มที่ 12, 14, 37. กรุงเทพฯ: โรงพิมพ์มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.
สุเชาว์ พลอยชุม. (2558). การใช้เหตุผลในพุทธปรัชญาเถรวาท. วารสารบัณฑิตศาสน์, 13(1), 23-35.
Aston, G. V. (2004). Early Indian logic and the question of Greek influence. (Doctoral dissertation in Philosophy). University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
Ganeri, J. (2012). Identity as reasoned choice: a South Asian perspective on the reach and resources of public and practical reason in shaping individual identities. A&C Black.
Ganeri, J. (2014). The lost age of reason: Philosophy in early modern India 1450-1700: Oxford University Press.
Gier, N. (1983). Dialectic: East and West. Indian Philosophical Quarterly: Journal of the Department of Philosophy University of Poona, 10(2), 207-218.
Kubica, O. (2014). Beyond Influence. A Reflection on the History of Research on the Milindapañha, with a Comparison of the Text to the Kitab al Khazari. Eos, 101, 187-206.
Paul, R., & Binker, A. J. A. (1990). Socratic questioning. Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world, 269-298.
Solomon, E. A. (1976). Indian dialectics: Methods of philosophical discussion Volume I. Ahmedabad India: B. J. Institute of Learning and Reserach.
Walton, D. N. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? The journal of Philosophy, 87(8), 399-419.
Walton, D. N. (1992). Plausible argument in everyday conversation. New York: SUNY Press.
Walton, D. N. (1998). Persuasion Dialogue. In The New Dialectic: Conversational Contexts of Argument. University of Toronto Press.
Walton, D. N. (2007). Dialog theory for critical argumentation. Philadelphia USA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PANIDHANA JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of article published in Panidhana Journal is owned by "Panidhana" and its licensors
You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journalphilrecmu@gmail.com
