One God in a Stratified Society: How Did Rammohun Roy’s Teachings Challenge Religious and Caste Power Structures?
-
Keywords:
Theravāda Buddhism; Thai Buddhist Sangha; moral egalitarianism; institutional inequality; phenomenology of religion, Rammohun Roy, Monotheism, Caste System, Religious Authority, Religious Rationalism, Moral UniversalismAbstract
This article examines One God in a Stratified Society: How Did Rammohun Roy’s Teachings Challenge Religious and Caste Power Structures? by analyzing Rammohun Roy’s intellectual project as a pioneering religious and social reformer in colonial India. Drawing on the history of ideas alongside philosophical and sociological approaches to religion, the study situates Roy’s thought within the socio-political and religious transformations of late eighteenth- and early nineteenth-century India. It argues that Roy’s advocacy of monotheism, religious rationalism, and moral universalism functioned not merely as theological propositions but as a critical framework that destabilized entrenched religious authority and the legitimacy of the caste system. By reinterpreting Hinduism through the lens of the Upanishads and ethical reason, Roy challenged the ritualistic monopoly of the Brahmin elite and redefined religion as a domain accessible to all individuals regardless of birth, caste, or gender. His insistence on universal moral principles enabled religion to serve as a vehicle for social critique, particularly in campaigns against practices such as sati and other forms of structural inequality. At the same time, the article highlights the theoretical tensions inherent in Roy’s project, including criticisms from orthodox Hindu perspectives and postcolonial scholars who question his reliance on Enlightenment rationalism. Ultimately, the study contends that Roy’s legacy should be understood as a form of “critical religion,” offering enduring insights into how religious thought can engage reason and moral equality to confront stratified social orders in the modern world.
References
Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: Discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam.
Johns Hopkins University Press.
Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford University Press.
Bandyopadhyay, S. (2004). From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India. Orient Longman.
Chatterjee, P. (1986). Nationalist thought and the colonial world: A derivative discourse?. University of Minnesota Press.
Dirks, N. B. (2001). Castes of mind: Colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton
University Press.
Habermas, J. (2008). Between naturalism and religion: Philosophical essays. Polity.
Heimsath, C. H. (1964). Indian nationalism and Hindu social reform. Princeton University Press.
Kopf, D. (1979). The Brahmo Samaj and the shaping of the modern Indian mind. Princeton
University Press.
Roy, R. M. (1906). Tuhfatul Muwahhiddin or A gift to deists (O. Kabir, Trans.). Adi Brahmo Samaj.
(Original work published 1803–1804)
Roy, R. (1971). The English works of Raja Rammohun Roy (J. C. Ghose, Ed.; Vols. 1–6). Cosmo
Publications. (Original works published 1820–1833)
Sen, A. (2005). The argumentative Indian: Writings on Indian history, culture and identity. Farrar,
Straus and Giroux.
Sen, S. N. (1954). Rammohun Roy. National Book Trust.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press. (Original work published 1922)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 PANIDHANA JOURNAL

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright of article published in Panidhana Journal is owned by "Panidhana" and its licensors
You may request permission to use the copyright materials on this website by writing to journalphilrecmu@gmail.com
