WECHAT USE TO FORM THE SOCIAL CAPITAL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE

Main Article Content

Haihui Guo
Yunlong Duan

บทคัดย่อ

          Functional features of SNS attract user’s intention to use SNS. WeChat is the top SNS widely adopted by users in Chinese culture context. The objective of this paper is to examine how social capital of WeChat users are formed as the outcome of daily use of WeChat from the technology’s perspective. A new approach to interpret the continuance use intention as strategies of self-presentation and social support were introduced and investigated. The outcomes confirmed the continuance uses of WeChat have positive influence on the formation of individual’s social capital. It’s recommended that enterprise management needs to take a serious step into the initiate of WeChat kind of SNS Apps to promote customers.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Abro, M. R. & Zhenfang, L. (2013). Influence of self-presentation on bridging social capital in SNSs: a moderating effect of self-presentation. Research on Humanities and social sciences, 3(19), 74-81.

Alwin, D. F. & Hauser, R. M. (1975). The Decomposition of Effect in Path Analysis. American Sociological Review, 40(1), 37-47.

Becker, L., Dunwoody, S. & Rafaell, S. (1983). Cable’s impact on use of other news media. Journal of Broadcasting, 27(2), 127-142.

Boase, J. & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: on and off the internet.Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

Boyd, D. & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 201-230.

Boyd, D. & Heer, J. (2006). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. Proceedings of 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos, California.

Brandtzaeg, P. B. & Heim, J. (2009). Why people use social networking sites. Online Communities and Social Computing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

Burke, M., Kraut, R. & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York.

CAICT. (China Academy of Information and Technology). (2017). WeChat’s economic and social impacts in 2016. Retrieved April 23, 2017, from https://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/ztbg/201704/P020170420469064461417.pdf

Chan, C. (2015). When one app rules them all: The case of WeChat and mobile in China. Retrieved February 2, 2017, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/when-one-app-rules-them-all-case-wechat-mobile-china-connie-chan

Chen, S. C., Chen, H. H. & Chen, M. F. (2009). Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(9), 1248-1263.

Cheung, C. M., Chiu, P. Y. & Lee, M. K. (2011). Online social networks: why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(4), 1337-1343.

Choi, S. M., Kim, Y., Sung, Y. & Sohn, D. (2011). Bridging or bonding? Across-culture study of social relationships in social networking sites. Information, Communication & Society, 14(1), 107-129.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-120.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(2), 319-340.

Dunkel, S. C. & Brooks, K. (2009). The nature of social support. In H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Human Relationships. (pp. 1565-1570). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ellison, N., Heino, R. & Gibbs J. (2006). Managing impressions online: self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.

Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Gilbert, E. & Karahalios, K. (2009). Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of the 27thinternational conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York.

Guo, C., Shim, J. P. & Otondo, R. (2010). Social network services in China: An integrated model of centrality, trust, and technology acceptance. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 13(2), 76-99.

Hargittai, E. & Hsieh, Y. L. (2010). From dabblers to omnivores: a typology of social network site usage. In A Networked Self. Edited by Z. Papacharissi. London: Routledge.

Hirst, A., Bednall, D., Ashwin, M. & Icoz, O. (2009). The use and abuse of online social network sites by Gen Y in the EU: can marketing make a difference? Proceedings of the 5th international conference on business, management and economics. Yasar University.

Hsu, C. L. & Lin, C. C. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.

Jin, C. (2013). The perspective of a revised TRAM on social capital building: The case of Facebook usage. Information & Management, 50(4), 162-168.

Joinson, A. N. (2008). Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press, New York.

Katz, E., Blumler, G. & Gurevich, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. The Uses of Mass Communication: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage, California.

Kim, Y., Sohn, D. & Choi, S. M. (2011). Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: a comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computer in Human Behavior, 27(1), 365-372.

Ko, H. C. & Kuo, F. Y. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure?Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(1), 75-79.

Lai, V. S. & Li, H. (2005). Technology acceptance model for internet banking: an invariance analysis. Information & Management, 42(2), 373-386.

Lampe, C. Wash, R., Velasquez, A. & Ozkaya, E. Y. (2010). Motivations to participate in online com-munities. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, USA, 1927-1936

Lampe, C., Ellison, N. & Steinfield, C. (2006). A Facebook in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work, ACM Press, New York, USA, 167-170.

Lampe, C., Ellison, N. & Steinfield, C. (2007). A familiar face(book): profile elements as signals in an online social network. Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, California, USA, 435-444.

Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130-141.

Legris, P., Ingham, J. & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191-204.

Levy, M. R. (1987). VCR use and the concept of audience activity. Communication Quarterly, 35(3), 267-275.

Lin, C. H., Shih, H. Y. & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: The TRAM model. Psychology and Marketing, 24(7), 641-657.

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Papacharissi, Z. & Mendelson, A. (2010). Toward a new(er) sociability: Uses, gratifications and social capital on Facebook. Media Perspectives for the 21st Century. Routledge, New York.

Papacharissi, Z. & Rubin, A. M. (2000). Predictors of internet use. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.

Park, S. & Chung, N. (2011). Mediating roles of self-presentation desire in online game community commitment and trust behavior of Massive Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2372-2379.

Pfeil, U., Arjan, R. & Zaphiris, P. (2009). Age differences in online social networking - a study of user profiles and the social capital divide among teenagers and older users in MySpace. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 643-654.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Ryberg, T. & Larsen, M. C. (2008). Networked identities: understanding relationships between strong and weak ties in networked environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 103-115.

Serenko, A., Bontis, N. & Detlor, B. (2007). End-user adoption of animated interface agents in everyday work applications. Behavior & Information Technology, 26(2), 119-132.

Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C. & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a toolkit: a use and gratification approach to unbundling feature use. Computer in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2322-2329.

Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B. & Lampe, C. (2008). Online social network use, self-esteem, and social capital: a longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445.

Subrahmanyam, K. & Greenfield, P. (2008). Communicating online: adolescent relationships and the media. Online Communication and Adolescent Relationships, the Future of Children, 18(1), 119-146.

Tong, S. T., Heide, B. V. D., Langwell, L. & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531-549.

Valenzuela, S., Park, N. S. & Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-578.

Vitak, J., Ellison, N. B. & Steinfield, C. (2011). The ties that bond: reexaming the relationship between Facebook use and bonding social capital. Proceedings of 44th IEEE Havaii International conference, 1-10.