THE INFLUENCE OF HUMBLE LEADERSHIP ON EMPLOYEES’ PROACTIVE BEHAVIOR—THE ROLE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT AND CONSCIENTIOUSNESS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
Based on the perspective of psychological empowerment, this paper explores the influencemechanism and boundary conditions of humble leadership on employees’ proactive behavior. The results show that humble leadership positively affects employees’ proactive behavior. Psychological empowerment mediates partly between humble leadership and employee’s proactive behavior. On the other hand, the conscientiousness of employees regulates the relationship between psychological empowerment and employees’ proactive behavior. The higher the employee’s conscientiousness is, the weaker the positive relationship between psychological empowerment and employee’s proactive behavior is. The result provides a new theoretical perspective for further understanding the relationship of humble leadership and employees’ proactive behavior.
Article Details
“ข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วม (ถ้ามี) ขอรับรองว่า บทความที่เสนอมานี้ยังไม่เคยได้รับการตีพิมพ์และไม่ได้อยู่ระหว่างกระบวนการพิจารณาลงตีพิมพ์ในวารสารหรือแหล่งเผยแพร่อื่นใด ข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วมยอมรับหลักเกณฑ์การพิจารณาต้นฉบับ ทั้งยินยอมให้กองบรรณาธิการมีสิทธิ์พิจารณาและตรวจแก้ต้นฉบับได้ตามที่เห็นสมควร พร้อมนี้ขอมอบลิขสิทธิ์บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ให้แก่สถาบันการจัดการปัญญาภิวัฒน์หากมีการฟ้องร้องเรื่องการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์เกี่ยวกับภาพ กราฟ ข้อความส่วนใดส่วนหนึ่งและ/หรือข้อคิดเห็นที่ปรากฏในบทความข้าพเจ้าและผู้เขียนร่วมยินยอมรับผิดชอบแต่เพียงฝ่ายเดียว”
References
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational behavior, vol. 10: 123-167. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Aryee, S. (2006). Leader-member exchange in a Chinese context: Antecedents, the mediating role of psychological empowerment and outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59(7), 793-801.
Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W. & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Structural Distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6),
-1182.
Frese, M. & Fay, D. (2001). Personal Initiative: An Active Performance Concept for Work in the 21st Century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133-187.
Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K. & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2),
-161.
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B. & Eissa G. (2012). Bottom-Line Mentality as an Antecedent of Social Undermining and the Moderating Roles of Core Self-Evaluations and Conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 343-359.
Gregory, M. H. & John, J. D. (2000). Personality and Job Performance: The Big Five Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 869-879.
Janssen, O. (2005). The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 573-579.
Kamdar, D. & Van Dyne, L. (2007). The Joint Effects of Personality and Workplace Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Task Performance and Citizenship Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1286-1298.
Lei, X., Shan, Z., Su, T. & Yang, Y. (2015). A Study on The Influence of Humble Leadership Behavior on Employees’ Creativity. Management Science, 28(2), 115-125. [in Chinese]
Li, C., Tian, B. & Shi, Q. (2006). Transformational Leadership and Employee Work Attitude: the Intermediary Role of Psychological Empowerment. Psychological Journal, 38(2), 297-307. [in Chinese]
Liu, J. & Zou, H. (2013). The Influence of Transformational Leadership and Psychological Empowerment on Employees’ Creativity. Management of Scientifc Research, 34(3), 68-74. [in Chinese]
Liu, Y. (2011). Research on the Relationship Between Self Leadership and Employee’s Innovative Behavior-The Intermediary Effect of Psychological Authorization. Scientifc Research, 29(10), 1584-1593. [in Chinese]
Luo, J., Hua, C. & Zhong, J. (2015). A Study on the Influence of Humble Leadership on Employee’s Job Performance and Job Satisfaction. Soft Science, 29(10), 78-82. [in Chinese]
Marcus, B., Lee, K. & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big fve, or one in addition. Personnel Psychology, 60, 1-34.
McCrae, R. & Costa, P. T. Jr. (1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism Scales with Measures of the Five-Factor Theory of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 587-597.
Mei, H. (2012). The Connotation of Shared Leadership of Knowledge Team-Based on the Perspective of Source of Leader Powers. Management of Modernization, 5, 106-108. [in Chinese]
Morgeson, F. P. & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A. & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(1), 33-43.
Owens, B. P. & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling How to Grow: An Inductive Examination of Humble Leader Behaviors, Contingencies, and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 787-818.
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. J. & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed Humility in Organizations: Implications for Performance, Teams, and Leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538.
Qu, Q., He, Z. & Mei, Z. (2013). An Empirical Study on the Influence of Humble Leadership Behavior on Leadership Effectiveness and Employee Organizational Identity. Enterprise Management, (7), 101-109. [in Chinese]
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
Song, B. & Chen, A. (2017). The Effect of “Grabbing Red Envelope” On Incentive Management: A Perspective of Grounded Theory. Chinese Journal of Social Science and Management, 1(1), 30-43.
Steel, P. (2007). The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65-94.
Thomas, K. W. & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.
Wang, F. (2017). The Influence of Humble Leadership on Employees’ Innovation Behavior: Intermediary Effect of Innovative Self-Effcacy. Science of Leadership, 11, 28-30. [in Chinese]
Wang, M., Chu, Y. & Dai, X. (2011). A Review on the Structure of Rigor and Its Application. Progress in Psychological Science, 19(3), 440-448. [in Chinese]
Wang, X. F. & Howell, J. M. (2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identifcation, and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 775-790. [in Chinese]
Wang, Y. & Luo, J. (2017). Research on the Stimulating Mechanism of Employee’s Innovation Behavior: The Perspective of Humble Leadership. The Central University Of Finance and Economics Journal, 6, 110-118. [in Chinese]
Wei, H. & Pan, Q. (2012). Research on Employee Initiative Behavior and Its Driving Force in Complex Environment. Business Economy, 31(3), 94-97. [in Chinese]
Winter, D. G. (1991). A motivational model of leadership: Predicting long-term management success from TAT measures of power motivation and responsibility. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(2), 67-80.
Wu, M. (2010). Practice of questionnaire statistical analysis-SPSS operation and application. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press. [in Chinese]
Wu, M., Liu, Z. & Wu, J. (2009). Research on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership, Psychological Empowerment and Performance. Soft Science, 23(10), 111-117. [in Chinese]
Xu, Q., Xi, M. & Zhao, S. (2015). Research on Abusive Management and Employee’s proactive behavior from the Perspective of Job Engagement and Core Self-Evaluation. Journal of Management, 12(3), 347-354. [in Chinese]
Yao, J. (2016). Research on Humble Leadership in Enterprise Management. Knowledge Economy, 15, 96. [in Chinese]
Zhang, G. & Liao, Q. (2011). On the New Development of Foreign employee’s proactive behavior Research. Foreign Economics and Management, 33(3), 58-64. [in Chinese]
Zhang, P., Liu, W. & Liao, J. (2011). The Influence mechanism of Charismatic Leadership on Employees’ Creativity: Is Psychological Security Suffcient? Managing the World, (10), 94-107. [in Chinese]
Zhu, Y., Huang, L. & Zeng, C. (2014). Is Distributed Leadership the Driver of Employee Initiative A Test Based on Multiple-Intermediate Effect Model. Foreign Economy and Management, 36(9), 38-51. [in Chinese]