SELECTED FACTORS AFFECTING THE EFFICIENCY OF ACADEMIC AFFAIRS ADMINISTRATION BASED ON THE TEACH LESS, LEARN MORE POLICY OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS UNDER THE SECONDARY EDUCATION SERVICE AREA OFFICE 3
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objectives of this research were (1) to study the selected factors related to the efficiency academic affairs administration based on the Teach Less, Learn More (TLLM) policy of school administrators under the Secondary Education Service Area Office 3; (2) to study the efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy of school administrators; (3) to determine the relationship between the selected factors and the efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy of school administrators; and (4) to study the selected factors affecting the efficiency academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy of school administrators.
The sample consisted of 338 secondary school teachers under the Secondary Education Service Area Office 3, all of whom were obtained by stratified random sampling. The employed research instrument was a rating scale questionnaire dealing with data on organizational competency, resources promoting and supporting, policy quality, cooperation of school networking, and the efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy, with reliability coefficients of 0.94, 0.96, 0.96, 0.95 and 0.98, respectively. The statistics used for data analysis were the frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression analysis.
The research findings were as follows: (1) the overall and by-dimension selected factors were rated at a high level; (2) the overall and by-dimension components of efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy were rated at a high level; (3) all selected factors positively correlated with the efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy; and (4) the three selected factors significantly affecting the efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy were organizational competency, cooperation of school networking, and resources promoting and supporting, respectively, which altogether could explain the variance of efficiency of academic affairs administration based on the TLLM policy by 83 percent.
Article Details
I and co-author(s) certify that articles of this proposal had not yet been published and is not in the process of publication in journals or other published sources. I and co-author accept the rules of the manuscript consideration. Both agree that the editors have the right to consider and make recommendations to the appropriate source. With this rights offering articles that have been published to Panyapiwat Institute of Management. If there is a claim of copyright infringement on the part of the text or graphics that appear in the article. I and co-author(s) agree on sole responsibility.
References
Agam, I. (2014). Factors affecting the academic administration effectiveness of Islamic Private Schools in Satun Province. (Master thesis unpublished). Songkhla Rajabhat University, Songkhla. [in Thai]
Angganapattarakajorn, V. (2012). Application of Teach Less, Learn More to Learning Management in Mathematics Classroom. Journal of Education, 23(1), 1-11. [in Thai]
Chantarasorn, W. (2011). The theory of applying the public policies to action (5th ed.). Bangkok: Prik Wan Graphic Company Limited. [in Thai]
Hakaew, S. (2013). Factors affecting the academic administration effectiveness of schools under Khon Kaen Primary Educational Service Area Office 3. Master of Education Program in Educational Administration, Mahasarakham University. [in Thai]
Manongprasong, S. (2016). Management of “Moderate Class, More Knowledge” activities of Phitsanulok Kindergarten School. Administrative Leadership Development Program. Teacher Development Institute, Faculty and educational persons, Nakhon Pathom. [in Thai]
Nuengchalerm, P. (2016). Moderate class, more knowledge: Policy towards theory and action. Praewa Kalasin Academic Journal Kalasin University, 3(1), 137-146. [in Thai]
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Guidelines for Supervision of Learning Activities for Development 4H. Bangkok: Veterans Organization of The Press. [In Thai]
_____. (2016). The Manual of Time Management “Moderate Class, More Knowledge”. Bangkok: Organization of Delivery of Goods and Parcels. [in Thai]
_____. (2014). Thai education situations in the world forum 2014. Bangkok: Prik Wan Graphic Company Limited. [in Thai]
_____. (2012). Research report on policies and strategies for educational quality development of international countries Members. Bangkok: Prik Wan Graphic Company Limited. [in Thai]
Office of the Education Council. (2009). Global quality system How to enter primary quality schools. Bangkok: Prik Wan Graphic Company Limited. [in Thai]
Ritcharoon, P. (2011). Social Science Research Methodology (5th ed.). Bangkok: House of kermyst. [in Thai]
Thongkow, K. (2005). Applying Educational Policies and Plans to Action: Concepts, Theories and Guidelines for Action. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat University. [in Thai]
Wahachat, R. (2007). Academic administration for basic education schools. Songkhla: Thaksin University Book Center. [in Thai]
Wongcharoen, B. & Tiacharoen, S. (2018). The administration of “moderate class more knowledge” in Bansuanluang (Rattanawichit Phitayakhan) School. Journal of Educational Administration Silpakorn University, 9(1), 1-114. [in Thai]