THE DRIVING FACTORS TO THE SUCCESS OF SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT IN PHUKET PROVINCE

Main Article Content

Pahfun Chittmittrapap
Ruedej Kerdwichai
Pornkul Suksod
Duangkamon Chantararatmanee

Abstract

The objectives of this research were (1) to study the current condition of being a smart city of Phuket province; (2) to examine the mobilizing factors for the success of the smart city development of Phuket province; and (3) to propose guidelines for managing Phuket province as a smart city. This research employed a qualitative research methodology. Data were collected via in-depth interviews with key informants from two groups. The first group consisted of 10 senior executives of organizations in the state and private sectors in Phuket province concerned with the current condition of Phuket as a smart city, and the second group consisted of 6 Bangkok senior executives of organizations in the state and private sectors concerned with the mobilizing factors for the success of the development of Phuket as a smart city. In addition, two focus group discussions were conducted involving two groups of strategy experts each of which consisting of 6 experts, totaling 12 experts. The guidelines for focus group discussion were in a form containing a set of questions for discussion in order to create guidelines for management of Phuket as a smart city. Data were analyzed with content analysis, organizing the contents into the core of the study and organizing the topics into categories in accordance with the research objectives. The research findings showed that (1) regarding the current condition of Phuket as a smart city, the development was unable to achieve a concrete result sustainably due to the lack of information integration between concerned agencies, the lack of full cooperation from the private sector, the limited budget, and the inconsistency between existing laws and policies for the development of the smart city; (2) the mobilizing factors involved in the development of Phuket smart city included the public sector, the private sector, and the general people sector, of which the general people sector represented the most efficient mobilizing factor for the success of Phuket smart city; and (3) the guidelines for managing Phuket province as a smart city were the following: (3.1) the smart economy; (3.2) the smart tourism; (3.3) the tourism safety; (3.4) the growth of the city coupled with environment conservation; (3.5) the health service provision for people; (3.6) the education provision to create knowledge for people; and (3.7) the administration and management by the state sector to cope with the increasing number of tourists, to increase the competitive potential, to support the needs for using basic utilities, with the focus on convenience and safety.

Article Details

How to Cite
Chittmittrapap, P., Kerdwichai, R. ., Suksod, P. ., & Chantararatmanee, D. . (2022). THE DRIVING FACTORS TO THE SUCCESS OF SMART CITY DEVELOPMENT IN PHUKET PROVINCE. Panyapiwat Journal, 14(1), 188–202. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/250198
Section
Research Article

References

Anindra, F., Supangkat, S. H., & Kosala, R. R. (2019). Smart governance as smart city critical success factor (case in 15 cities in Indonesia). In International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) 2018 (pp. 1-6). West Java.

Chareonwongsak, K. (2013). Creative thinking. Success Media. [in Thai]

Fietkiewicz, K. J., & Stock, W. G. (2015). Are Japanese cities? An empirical investigation of infrastructures and governmental programs in Tokyo, Yokohama, Osaka, and Kyoto. In 48th Conference on System Sciences Hawaii International (pp. 2345-2354). IEEE.

Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology.

Lombardi, P. L., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. innovation the European. Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137-149.

Mangla, S. K., Luthra, S., Jakhar, S., & Singh Berwal, Y. P. (2017). Success factors to smart cities in India: An empirical investigation. Industrial Engineering Journal, 5(4), 6-12.

Myeong, S., Jung, Y., & Lee, K. (2018). A study on determinant factors in smart city development: An Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis. Sustainability, 10(2606), 1-17.

Voicu, M. C. (2011). Using the snowball method in marketing research on hidden populations. Challenges of the Knowledge Society, 1, 1341-1351.

Ministry of Digital Economy and Society. (2019). National agenda action plan: Smart city development. http://mdes.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/591130_smart%20city%202.pdf [in Thai]

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board. (2018). Report on situation analysis of poverty and inequality in Thailand 2017. Office of the National Economic and Social Development Board.

Oberti, I., & Pavesi, A. S. (2013). The triumph of the smart city. Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 5, 117-122.

Pal, D., Triyason, T., & Padungweang, P. (2018). Big data in smart-cities: Current research and challenges. Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI), 6(3), 351-360.

Pholsim, S. (2018). Understanding smart city. College of Local Administration Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Stawasz, D., Sikora-Fernandez, D., & Turala, M. (2012). Smart city concept as a factor for decision making in city management. Studia Informatica, 29(Szczecin), 97-109. [in Polish]

Sureshchandra, S. M., Bhavsar, J. J., & Pitroda, J. R. (2016). Assessment of critical success factors for smart cities using significance index method. IJARIIE, 2(1), 802-810.

Tohsira, C. (2015). Urbanization: Study on Thai educational preparation. Journal of Education Silpakorn University, 13(2), 181-191. [in Thai]