A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS MODEL OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT FOR WORKING ADULTS IN PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN BANGKOK

Main Article Content

Nattika Srimakutphun
Wirathep Pathumcharoenwattana
Sutheera Nimitniwat

Abstract

This research provides a confirmatory factor analysis model of Paul G. Stoltz’s adversity quotient and Daniel Goleman’s emotional quotient by using a survey research methodology. The research instrument was a questionnaire consisting of 45 items which has the Index of Item Objective Congruence (IOC) between 0.66-1.00 and the reliability coefficient of 0.95. The research sample consisted of 300 working adults in private universities in Bangkok, obtained by simple random sampling who voluntarily gave information to answer the online questionnaire. Research data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics of percentage, mean and standard deviation and using inferential statistics of confirmatory factor analysis.


The results showed that the stability of the adversity quotient and emotional quotient of working adults were found to hold the mean of safety values between the two using the statistical modification index to adjust the model totaling 17 pairs. The results of the model analysis of adversity quotient and emotional quotient were consistent with the empirical data. The adversity quotient consisted of 4 factors that could be ranked based on their factor loadings from top to bottom as follows; the factor of control, the factor of searching for causes and responsibility for the problems, the factor of upcoming impacts, and the factor of ability to deal with the enduring problems, respectively. All factors were consistent with the empirical data. The factor loading was statistically significant at the 0.05 level. The emotional quotient was consistent with conditional evidence-base at the statistical acceptance level, covering 5 factors as follows; the factor of realizing one’s emotions, the factor of appropriately control one’s emotions, the factor of empathy, the factor of motivating oneself, and the factor of handling relationships. The results of the analysis revealed that the factor of motivating oneself received the highest component weight, followed by the factor of empathy, the factor of realizing one’s emotion, the factor of handling relationships, and the factor of appropriately control one’s emotions, respectively, all of which were consistent with the empirical data, the factor loading was also statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

Article Details

How to Cite
Srimakutphun, N., Pathumcharoenwattana, W., & Nimitniwat, S. (2023). A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS MODEL OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND EMOTIONAL QUOTIENT FOR WORKING ADULTS IN PRIVATE UNIVERSITIES IN BANGKOK. Panyapiwat Journal, 15(3), 273–288. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/261757
Section
Research Article

References

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. John Wiley & Sons.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen., & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.

Department of Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health. (2019). Emotional quotient handbook. https://dmh.go.th/download/ebooks/EQ11.pdf [in Thai]

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, A. D. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Sage Publications.

Durande-Moreau, A., & Usunier, J. (1999). Time styles and the waiting experience: An exploratory study. Journal of Service Research, 2(2), 173-186.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. Bantam Books.

Gould, R. (1978). Transformation: Growth and change in adult life. Simon & Schuster.

Guntha, P. (2020). Emotional intelligence affecting quality of life of merchant marine cadets at Merchant Marine Training Centre [Master’s thesis]. Silpakorn University. [in Thai]

Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Bain, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education International.

Harrison-Walker, J. (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research, 4(1), 60-75.

Hiranphicha, N. (2020). Effects of emotional quotient on service behaviors of secretaries in Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi. Journal of Management and Development Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University, 7(2), 119-132. [in Thai]

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Levinson, D. J. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. Random House Digital, Inc.

Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling. An introduction to LISREL and EQS. Springer-Verlag.

Nakwatchara, W. (2001). How to treat your child to be smart good and happy IQ EQ MQ AQ (3rd ed.). Amarin Printing & Publishing.

Noklang, S., Srisuantang, S., & Tanpichai, P. (2015). A confirmatory factor analysis model of adversity quotient among third year students in the five-year teacher education course at Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus. Journal of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus, 7(1), 109-125. [in Thai]

Office of the Higher Education Commission. (2018, May 20). Annual report 2017. http://www.info.mua.go.th/information/show_all_statdata_table.php?data_show=4 [in Thai]

Piamsuppasap, D. (2011). Emotional Quotient (EQ) Spiritual Quotient (SQ) influencing individual creativity: A case study of sport authority of Thailand (sat)’s officers [Master’s thesis]. Silpakorn University. [in Thai]

Phisankittikhun, T. (2015). Emotional quotient affecting work efficiency: A case study of employees in power system control and operation division, electricity generating authority of Thailand [Master’s thesis]. Silpakorn University. [in Thai]

Praditsaeng, M. (2016). Emotional intelligence and social intelligence of lecturers working in three provinces in southern Thailand (Research report). Office of the Higher Education Commission. [in Thai]

Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2011). Emotional intelligence mediates the relationship between mindfulness and subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1116-1117.

Sheehy, G. (1981). Pathfinders. William Morrow and Company, Inc.

Sorbon, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International.

Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient turning obstacles into opportunities. Wiley.

Suwannalarp, P. (2016). Adversity quotient, perception of organizational justice and turnover intention: A case study of sales staff of one airline company [Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University. [in Thai]

Thongsawat, N. (1994). Linear Structural Relationships (LISREL): Analytical statistics for social and behavioral science research. Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]

Thongsawat, S., Rodprasert, P., & Chullasap, N. (2020). States, problems and developing guidelines of academic staffs organization commitment of the private universities in Thailand. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology (Humanities and Social Sciences), 6(2), 353-368. https://so04.tcithaijo.org/index.php/svittj/article/download/201393/166899 [in Thai]

Weisinger, H. (1998). Emotional intelligence at work: The untapped edge for success. Jossey-Bass.

Wiratchai, N. (1994). Linear Structural Relationships (LISREL): Analytical statistics for social and behavioral science research. Chulalongkorn University Printery. [in Thai]

Yuwanna, T., & Wacharayoo, P. (2014). The influence of adversity quotient and self-esteem towards production worker’s well-being in a packaging company. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Kasetsart University, 40(1), 147-165. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/socku/article/view/79772 [in Thai]