TEACHERS’ AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS AN IN-HOUSE EFL TEXTBOOK

Main Article Content

Apisara Sritulanon

บทคัดย่อ

The in-house textbook, ‘English for Work’, was developed for use as English teaching materials and professional preparations. This study aimed to examine teacher and student perceptions towards the in-house textbook, after using it as the core teaching material of GE1003 English for Communication II course focusing on English used in the workplace. The participants were divided into two groups. The first group comprised eight teachers who taught GE1003 in the second semester of 2011 academic year. Those teachers had different teaching experience.  The second group were seventeen students from different faculties studying GE1003 English for Communication in a certain class. The interview was employed as a research tool to examine teacher and student perceptions. The group interview was used to examine teacher perception, whereas individual interviews were used to examine student perceptions. The data analysis was categorized based on the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) standards. The results showed that teachers and students had positive perceptions towards the in-house textbook, “English for Work”. In addition, they gave constructive comments which were useful not only to strengthen the good points of the textbook, but also to improve its weaknesses for the purpose of supporting students’ different learning strategies.

Article Details

บท
บทความวิจัย

References

Brinton, D. (2003). Content-based Instruction. In Nunan, D. (Ed.) Practical English language teaching. New York: McGrawHill.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fromkin, V. & Rodman, R. (1998). An Introduction to Language. (6th ed.). Florida: Harcourt Brace College Publisher.

Huang, W. J. & Shih, Y. (2009). An Evaluation of Junior High School English Textbooks in Taiwan. Fu Jen Studies: literature & linguistics, (42), 115.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Retrieved April 20, 2011, from sdkrashen.com/Principles_and_Practice/Principles_and_ Practice.pdf

Lawrence, W. (2011). Textbook Evaluation: A Framework for Evaluating the Fitness of the Hong Kong New Secondary School (NSS) Curriculum. Unpublished master’s degree. City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and Methods in ELT, (2nd ed.). Victoria: Blackwell Publishing.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd.Textbook Evaluation Instrument Based on the ACTFL Standards. (n.d.). Retrieved September 5, 2011, from http://documentsearch.org/pdf/actfl-textbook-evaluation-form.html

Tomlinson, B. & Masuhar H. (2004). Developing Language Course Materials. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.

Tomlinson, B. & Masuhar H. (2010). Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for Best Practice. Chennai: Replika Press Pvt. Ltd.

Wichitwarit, N. (2014). Essential elements contributing to the success of task-based implementation in an English classroom. Panyapiwat Journal, (5), 47-62.