A Study of Grade 11th Students’ Level of Representation in Physics on Light Waves Using Virtual Laboratory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study the level of representations in Physics regarding light radiation in Grade 11 students using Virtual laboratory. The target group in this research consists of 41 grade 11 students, in the first semester of the Academic year 2023, from an extra-large secondary school in Roi-Et province. They were selected through purposive sampling. The research tools are included: 1) Virtual laboratory lesson plans on radiation light, consisting of 6 lesson plans, totaling 12 hours, which are deemed highly suitable. 2) A level of representations in physics test, consisting of 4 questions with a difficulty index ranging from 0.46 to 0.70 and a discrimination index ranging from 0.41 to 0.83. The test’s reliability is 0.974. Statistics for data analysis include percent, mean and standard deviation.
The research analysis revealed that in the first experiment cycle, students who were able to explain the phenomena using all 3 levels of representation in physics (ALL) were 11 students (26.73%), while there were still 30 students (73.17%) who had not yet passed the evaluation criteria. In the second experiment cycle, 12 students (40%) were able to explain the phenomena using all 3 levels of representation in Physics (ALL), and 18 students (60%) did not pass. In the third experiment cycle, all 18 students (100%) were able to explain the phenomena using all 3 levels of representation in Physics (ALL).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. All articles undergo a thorough with at least three reviewers evaluating their suitability within the respective field of study, during the double-blind review.
2. The views expressed by individual authors do not represent the official views of the Editorial Boards of RMUJ: The author of each articie is responsible for all its contents.
3. The Editorial Boards do not reserve the copyrights. but proper citations need to be made.
References
บุญเกื้อ ควรหาเวช. (2553). ห้องเรียนเสมือนจริง (Virtual Classroom). สืบค้น 14 เมษายน 2566 จาก http://www.st.ac.th/ av/inno_virtclass.htm.
ไพศาล วรคำ. (2566). การวิจัยทางการศึกษา Educational Research (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 14). ตักสิลาการพิมพ์.
ยืน ภู่วรวรรณ. (2546). ไอซีทีเพื่อการศึกษาไทย. ซีเอ็ดยูเคชั่น.
ศักดิ์ศรี สุภาษร (2555). บทบาทของเมนทอลโมเดลในการเรียนรู้วิชาเคมีในระดับโมเลกุล. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยขอนแก่น, 35(1), 1-7.
อัญชนา ภักดีวงษ์ และ อัมพร วัจนะ. (2564). การพัฒนาทักษะกระบวนการทางวิทยาศาสตร์ขั้นบูรณาการด้วยชุดกิจกรรมการทดลองแบบสืบเสาะบนเฟซบุ๊ก (Facebook) เรื่อง สารบริสุทธิ์ ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 1. วารสารวิชาการและวิจัยมหาวิทยาลัยภาคตะวันออกเฉียงเหนือ, 11(2), 113-126.
Banda, H.J., Nzabahimana, J. (2023). The Impact of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulation-Based Learning on Motivation and Academic Achievement Among Malawian Physics Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(1), 127-141.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press.
Erven H. Mosqueda, C. (2023). Effect of utilizing interactive virtual lab on students’ performance in physics. International Journal of Advanced Research, 11(5), 1718-1741.
Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2009). Multiple representations in Chemical Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education (Vol.4). SPRINGER.
Gunawan, G., Nisrina, N., Suranti, N. M. Y., Herayanti, L. and Rahmatiah, R. (2018). Virtual Laboratory to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Physics Learning. Journal of Physics. Series 1, 1108(2018), 1-6.
Kozma, R. B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14.
Treagust D. F., Duit R., Fischer H. E. (2019). Multiple Representations in Physics Education (Vol 10). SPRINGER.
Treagust, D. F. (2008). The Role of Multiple Representations in Learning Science. In Lee Y. J. & Ten A. L. (Eds.), Science Education at the Nexus of Theory and Practice (pp. 7-23). Sense Publisher.
