Factors Influencing Organizational Citizenship Behavior : A case study Commercial Bank Employees in Thailand

Main Article Content

Chanettee Piphatanangkun
Piyachart Jarutirasarn
Apicha Boonpattarakan
Boonchop Poompaichit

Abstract

    The objectives of this research were to analyze the relationship between factors and the organizational citizenship behavior, and analyze the influence of factors affecting the organizational citizenship behavior.  This research was a quantitative one.  The questionnaire was used as the research tool.  Three hundred and seventy commercial bank employees in Thailand were selected by stratified random sampling method as samples for this research.  The data were collected by mailed survey response and by the researcher herself.  Then, the data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation, and stepwise multiple regression analysis. The results revealed that the factors of supportive leadership, mindfulness leadership, broad-minded leadership, organizational justice, self-efficiency, job satisfaction, organizational recognition, and organizational climate were positively related to the organizational citizenship behavior.  It showed that their interrelationship were at high level.  In terms of the factors influenced the organizational citizenship behavior, the results found that all factors together could help predict the organizational citizenship behavior in altruism at 69.40 percent at statistical significance of .05 and correlated positively to the organizational climate which received the highest level of prediction.  Next on down were self-efficiency, organizational recognition, and the supportive leadership, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

ดำรงเกียรติ มาลา. (2558). สมองไหล โจทย์ใหญ่แบงค์ไทย. (15 มกราคม 2562) สืบค้นจาก www.posttoday.com.

ธนาคารแห่งประเทศไทย. (2560). ข้อมูลผู้ใช้บริการธนาคารผ่านเทคโนโลยี. (10 ตุลาคม 2560) สืบค้นจาก www.bot.os.th.

นงลักษณ์ วิรัชชัย. (2543). พรมแดนความรู้ด้านการวิจัยและสถิติ. ชลบุรี : วิทยาลัยการบริหารรัฐกิจ มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา.

สฎายุ ธีระวณิชตระกูล. (2547). การส่งเสริมพฤติกรรมเป็นสมาชิกต่อองค์การสู่การพัฒนาทรัพยากร
มนุษย์ในองค์การอย่างยั่งยืน. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา, 16(1), 15-28.

สุวิมล ติรกานันท์. (2550). ระเบียบวิธีวิจัยทางสังคมศาสตร์ : แนวทางปฏิบัติ. กรุงเทพฯ : โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Baeka, Y. M, & Jungb, C. S, (2015). Focusing the mediating role of institutional trust : How does inter
personal trust promote organizational commitment? . The Social Science Journal , 52, 481–489.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social learning theory. Englewood Clivs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.

Bazerman, M. H., Simon & Schuster. (2014). The power of noticing : what the best leaders see,
first simon & schuster hardcover edition. New York : Simon & Schuster.

Duffy, J. A., & Lilly, J. (2013). Do individual needs moderate the relationships between organizational
citizenship behavior, organizational trust and perceived organizational support?.
Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(3), 185-197.

Freedman & Fiedeldey-Van Dijk. (2004). Speaking out : What Motivates Employees to be
More Productive. (March 20, 2018) Retrieved from
www.epsyconsultancy.com/resources/Speaking%20Out-productivity.

Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975). Deverlopment of the job diagnostic survey.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), 159-170.

LePine, et al., (2002). The nature and dimensionality of organizational citizenship behavior : a critical
review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 52-65.

Maamari, B., & Messarra, L. (2012). An empirical study of the relationship between organizational
climate and organizational citizenship behavior. European Journal of Management, 16(2), 165-174.

Meierhans, D., Brigitte & Jonas, K. (2008). Influence of fair and support leadership behavior on
commitment and 0rganizational citizenship behavior. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67(3), 131-141.

Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors
of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel psychology, 48(4), 775-802.

Ozcelik, G. & Mine Findikli, M. A. (2014). The relationship between internal branding and organizational citizenship behavior : the mediating role of person-organozation fit.
Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150(2014), 1120-1128.

Pavalache-Ilie, M. (2014). Organizational citizenship behavior, work satisfaction and employee
personality. Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 127, 489-493.

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors and sales unit
effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(1), 351–363.

Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior and
the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 262–270.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B. & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizen ship
behaviors : a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.

Rahman, Shahrazad, Sulaiman, Nasir & Omar. (2012). The role of job satisfaction as mediator in the
relationship between self-efficacy and organizational citizenship behavior among indonesian teachers. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(9), 255-257.

Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy scale.
Measures In Health Psychology : A Users Portfolio, 35-37.

Sheikh K, Gilson L, Agyepong IA, Hanson K, Ssengooba F, et al. (2011). Building the Field of
Health Policy and Systems Research : Framing the Question. PLOS Medicine, 8(8)

Sheppard, B., Lewiki, R. and Minton, J. (1992). Organizational justice the search for fairness in the workplace. New York : Lexington Books.

Taylor, W. C. (2007). Leading with an open mind. Executive forum.
Leader to Leader of John Wiley & Sons, Inc, (2007), 32-36.

Yulk, G. (1998). Leadership in Organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ : Prentice-Hall.