What factors influence student satisfaction in the private higher education sector of Yangon, Myanmar? An examination of the program profile, quality of learning and teaching, quality of services, and infrastructure

Authors

  • Zin Wint War Aung International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand
  • Leela เตี้ยงสูงเนิน Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8291-9840
  • Hlaing Hlaing Moe DBU International College, Yangon, Myanmar
  • Sayamol Nongbunnak International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Thailand

Keywords:

Student Satisfaction, Quality of Learning and Teaching, Quality of Services, Myanmar Private Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

This study aims to explore factors affecting student satisfaction in private higher education institutions in Yangon, Myanmar. Four variables were investigated consisting of curriculum, teaching and learning quality, service quality, and infrastructure. A quantitative research approach was employed, with sample size calculated using Yamane's formula. Data was collected through questionnaires administered to students enrolled in private higher education institutions in Yangon. Hypotheses were tested using multiple regression analysis and one-way analysis of variance. The findings revealed that the majority of respondents were enrolled in business administration programs, followed by engineering and information technology, with a preference for traditional classroom-based teaching and learning. Master program’ students demonstrated significantly higher satisfaction levels than undergraduate program’ students (p < 0.05). Hypothesis testing results indicated that curriculum (H1) had a partial influence on student satisfaction, while learning and teaching quality (H2), service quality (H3), and infrastructure (H4) had statistically significant positive influences on student satisfaction (p < 0.001). The findings highlight that adopting a student-centered strategy through improving learning and teaching quality, enhancing service quality, and improving infrastructure are essential for improving student satisfaction and strengthening the competitiveness of private higher education institutions in Yangon.

References

Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 24(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641543

Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/853821543501252792/pdf/132579-PUB-Impact-of-School.pdf

Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2003). Research in education (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555

Douglas, J., Douglas, A., & Barnes, B. (2006). Measuring student satisfaction at a UK university. Quality Assurance in Education, 14(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610678568

Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01

Gloria, D. S., Pelayo, E. T. C., & Castro, R. D. (2025). The role of infrastructure and student satisfaction in higher education: Inputs for campus development plan. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 83(4), 501-524. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1481943

Hanssen, T. E. S., & Solvoll, G. (2015). The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian University. Facilities, 33(13/14), 744-759. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2014-0081

Latip, M. S. A., Newaz, F. T., & Ramasamy, R. (2020). Students' perception of lecturers' competency and the effect on institution loyalty: The mediating role of students' satisfaction. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 183-195. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1267361

Onditi, E. O., & Wechuli, T. W. (2017). Service quality and student satisfaction in higher education institutions: A review of literature. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7(7), 328-335. https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-0717.php?rp=p676590

Phyu, P. E., & Siriwato, S. (2022). The progress and challenges of higher education in Myanmar. In Proceedings of RSU International Research Conference (pp. 50-64). Institute of Diplomacy and International Studies, Rangsit University. https://rsucon.rsu.ac.th/files/proceedings/RSUSOC2022/IN22-027.pdf

Prakash, G. (2018). Quality in higher education institutions: Insights from the literature. The TQM Journal, 30(6), 732-748. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2017-0043

Qureshi, F. H., & Khawaja, S. (2021). The growth of private higher education: An overview in the context of liberalisation, privatization and marketisation. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(9), 171-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i9.3896

Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16(2), 129–150.

Rasheed, R., & Rashid, A. (2024). Role of service quality factors in word of mouth through student satisfaction. Kybernetes, 53(9), 2854-2870. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-01-2023-0119

Ruiz Esteban, C. M., & Santos del Cerro, J. (2020). Teaching quality: The satisfaction of university students with their professors. Anales de Psicología Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.335431

Sabela, P. T., Masuku, M. M., & Mthembu, Z. (2023). Diversity and its implications for teaching and learning in higher educational institutions. In M. O. Maguvhe, & M. M. Masuku (Eds), Using African epistemologies in shaping inclusive education knowledge (pp. 411-430). Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31115-4_22

Sadiq Sohail, M., & Shaikh, N. M. (2004). Quest for excellence in business education: A study of student impressions of service quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540410512163

Sitanggang, N., Luthan, P. L. A., & Hamid, K. A. (2021). Relationship between total personal quality, service quality and student satisfaction on higher education system. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14421a

Tessema, M. T., Ready, K., & Yu, W. (2012). Factors affecting college students’ satisfaction with major curriculum: Evidence from nine years of data. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(2), 34-44. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271077752

Tilak, J. B. G. (2025). The ever-growing private higher education, critical yet underexamined. Higher Education, 89(1), 1445–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01269-z

Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856

Weerasinghe, I. M. S., & Dedunu, H. (2017). University staff, image and students' satisfaction in selected regional universities in Sri Lanka. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 19(5), 34-37. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331311190_University_Staff_Image_and_Students'_Satisfaction_in_Selected_Regional_Universities_in_Sri_Lanka

Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85, 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0

World Bank. (2023). Education in Myanmar: Where are we now? Author. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/716418bac40878ce262f57dfbd4eca05-0070012023/original/State-of-Education-in-Myanmar-July-2023.pdf

Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper and Row.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Aung, Z. W. W., เตี้ยงสูงเนิน L., Moe, H. H., & Nongbunnak, S. (2026). What factors influence student satisfaction in the private higher education sector of Yangon, Myanmar? An examination of the program profile, quality of learning and teaching, quality of services, and infrastructure. SUTHIPARITHAT JOURNAL, 40(2), 30–50. retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DPUSuthiparithatJournal/article/view/284337

Issue

Section

Research Articles