Rethinking the Vietnam War: Vietnamese representation and the Limits of Superpower Narratives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.57260/csdj.2025.281525Keywords:
Vietnam war, Vietnamese agency, Cold war historiography, Small-state strategy, Postcolonial theory, Contested memory, Sino-Vietnamese relationsAbstract
This study re-examines the Vietnam War through an agent-centered analytical framework, challenging dominant Cold War historiography that positions Vietnam as a passive battleground for superpower competition. Drawing on political science, postcolonial theory, and international relations, the research integrates diplomatic archives, oral histories, and cultural memory studies to recentralize Vietnamese agency and foreground Sino-Vietnamese interactions. The analysis reveals how indigenous political movements, postcolonial state-building imperatives, and small-state survival strategies shaped the conflict's trajectory and outcomes.
Findings demonstrate that while U.S. containment policies and Sino-Soviet rivalries provided structural constraints, Vietnamese political elites, civil society actors, and ordinary citizens actively negotiated, redefined, and ultimately determined the war's meaning and legacy. The study contributes to international relations theory by advancing a decentered geopolitical framework that reconceptualizes minor states and local actors as co-architects rather than passive recipients of global order. Contemporary implications include strategic lessons for small states navigating great-power competition and methodological innovations for writing inclusive, multi-vocal histories of conflict.
Downloads
References
Ang, C. G. (2002). The Vietnam War from the other side. Routledge.
Asselin, P. (2002). A bitter peace: Washington, Hanoi, and the making of the Paris Agreement. University of North Carolina Press.
Chen, J. (1995). China's road to the Korean War: The making of the Sino-American confrontation. Columbia University Press.
Elliott, D. W. P. (2003). The Vietnamese war: Revolution and social change in the Mekong Delta, 1930–1975. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 3(2), 227–231. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2008.3.2.227
Heineman, K. J. (2001). A Catholic New Deal: Religion and reform in Depression Pittsburgh. Church History, 70(3), 595-597. https://doi.org/10.2307/3654533
Hickey, G. C. (2001). The war in Vietnam: Studies in the social and cultural history of the Army of the Republic of Vietnam. University Press of Kansas.
Kwon, H. (2006). After the massacre: Commemoration and consolation in Ha My and My Lai. University of California Press.
Kwon, H. (2008). Ghosts of war in Vietnam. Cambridge University Press.
Lewy, G. (1978). America in Vietnam. Oxford University Press.
Melanson, R. A. (2000). American foreign policy since the Vietnam War: The search for consensus from Nixon to Clinton. M. E. Sharpe.
Ninh, K. N. B. (2002). A world transformed: The politics of culture in revolutionary Vietnam, 1945–1965. University of Michigan Press.
Schwenkel, C. (2009). The American War in contemporary Vietnam: Transnational remembrance and representation. Indiana University Press.
Thayer, G. (1985). The war business: The international trade in armaments. Simon & Schuster.
Thu, H, L. (2018). Vietnam’s communist revolution: The power and limits of ideology. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 40(2), 336-338. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26539186
Zhai, Q. (2001). China and the Vietnam wars, 1950–1975. Political Science Quarterly, 116(2), 321-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/798074
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Community and Social Development Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
1. Articles, information, content, images, etc published in the “Community and Social Development Journal” are copyrighted by the Community and Social Development Journal, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University. In order to properly distribute the articles through print and electronic media, the authors still hold the copyright for the published articles under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows the re-distribution of the articles in other sources. References must be made to the articles in the journal. The authors are responsible for requesting permission to reproduce copyrighted content from other sources.
2. The content of the articles appearing in the journal is the direct responsibility of the article authors. The editorial board of the journal does not necessarily agree with or share any responsibility.



