Main Article Content
This survey research aims to (1) fnd out the factors of adaptive leadership, (2) study the level of adaptive leadership, (3) compare the levels of adaptive leadership as classifed by school size, and (4) study the guidelines for development of adaptive leadership of school administrators. The research sample consisted of 350 government teachers under the Secondary Education Service Area Offce 4 in Pathum Thani province, obtained by stratifed random sampling based on school size, and 8 school administrators. The tools of this research were a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire with reliability coeffcient of 0.980 and an interview form. Data was analyzed and processed by a statistical package program. Statistics employed for data analysis were the mean, standard deviation, analysis of variance, exploratory factor analysis by the principal component extraction method (Principal Component Analysis: PCA) with the signifcant level for hypothesis testing being pre-determined at .05 level, and content analysis. The results of this research were that (1) 4 factors of adaptive leadership of administrators were identifed and could be ranked based on their importance as follows: the achievement motivation, the personnel potential development, the teamwork, and the organizational culture, respectively; (2) the overall and specifc aspects of adaptive leadership of administrators were found to be at the high level and could be ranked as follows: the frst rank was the achievement motivation factor, followed by the organizational culture factor, the teamwork factor, and the personnel potential development factor, respectively; (3) the government teachers working in schools of different sizes differed signifcantly in their opinions toward the administrators’ overall adaptive leadership, the specifc aspect of achievement motivation and the specifc aspect of teamwork with the ,05 level of statistical signifcance; and (4) the guidelines for development of adaptive leadership of school administrators consisted of the policy on upgrading the level of professionalism of administrators and the policy on upgrading educational leadership of administrators. This research brought about
the knowledge on the characteristic of achievement motivation which was the key factor of adaptive leadership of school administrators leading to the effcient and effective development
of the organization.
I and co-author(s) certify that articles of this proposal had not yet been published and is not in the process of publication in journals or other published sources. I and co-author accept the rules of the manuscript consideration. Both agree that the editors have the right to consider and make recommendations to the appropriate source. With this rights offering articles that have been published to Panyapiwat Institute of Management. If there is a claim of copyright infringement on the part of the text or graphics that appear in the article. I and co-author(s) agree on sole responsibility.
Akarathitipong, C. (2014). Organization Development in Human resource development teaching materials. Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya: Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Albano, C. (2007). What is Adaptive Leadership? Retrieved August 12, 2018, from https://www.selfgrowth.com/articles/calbano.html
Best, J. W. (1981). Research in education (4th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Boonla, D. (2013). Relationship between leadership styles and school effectiveness Under the Secondary Educational Service Area Offce 20. Master’s thesis, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Boonprom, P. (2012). Development of job performance of school administrators Primary school Under the Offce of t he Basic Education Commission Academic. Journal of Eastern Asia University, 4(1), 143-149. [in Thai]
Bowonthamachak, T. (2011). The relationship of change leadership and work motivation of employees in small and medium enterprises in the service sector. Master’s thesis, Kasetsart University. [in Thai]
Chaepho, P. (2012). Teachers’ opinions on executive roles in developing teamwork of school teachers Bueng District Offce Under the jurisdiction of Bangkok. Master’s thesis, Ramkhamhaeng University. [in Thai]
Chaichana, S. (2013). Indicators of change leadership of basic school administrators. Ph.D. thesis, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Dawson, B. & Trapp, R. G. (2001). Basic & clinical biostatistics (3rd ed.). Boston: Lange Medical Books.
Fritzgerald, K. C., Chaiyasongkram, P. & Wongsan, V. (2007). Leadership of the school administrators perceived by teachers in schools under the offce of Phang-nga Educational Service Area. Master’s thesis, Maha Sarakham Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Geyer, V. (2005). The authorizer and charter school closure: Exercising adaptive leadership to project the public interest. Authorizer Issue Brief, 8, 1-6.
Glover, J., Jones, G. & Friedman, H. (2002). Adaptive Leadership: When Change is Not Enough (Part 1). Organizational Development Journal, 20(2), 15-31.
Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A. & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Offce of Secondary Education Area 4. (2018). Basic school information Under the Offce of Secondary Educational Service Area 4 (Pathum Thani). Retrieved August 1, 2018, from https://data.bopp-obec.info/emis/school.php?Area_CODE=101704 [in Thai]
Phiphatphon, D., Jun-eiam, P. & Kosalanantakul, O. (2010). Executive Leadership Educational institutions according to the opinions of teachers Under the offce of Pathumthani Education Area Offce. Master’s thesis, Valaya Alongkorn Rajabhat University under Royal Patronage. [in Thai]
Powphan, C. (2015). Basic concepts and theories of leadership of school administrators in the 21st century. Journal of Educational Management for Local Development to the ASEAN Community: New Directions in the 21st Century, 1(1), 301-313. [in Thai]
Saenkaew, A. (2015). Adaptation leadership of school administrators under the Secondary Educational Service Area Offce 19. Master’s thesis, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Sims, B. D. (2009). Complexity, Adaptive Leadership, Phase Transitions, and New Emergent Order: A Case Study of the Northwest Texas Conference of the United Methodist Church. Doctor
of Philosophy in Organizational Leadership, Regent University. [in Thai]
Simsen, O. (2013). Executive service leadership affecting school effectiveness under the Secondary Educational Service Area Offce 25. Master’s thesis, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Thavee-utit, C., Pawabutr, C., Suwantai, W. & Phailai, T. (2012). Academic leadership development model of secondary school administrators Under the Offce of the Basic Education
Commission In the northeast region. Doctoral thesis, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R. & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
Watekanan, B. (2016). Guidelines for the development of core competencies of private school administrators Under the Offce of Songkhla Primary Educational Service Area 2. Master’s thesis, Hat Yai University. [in Thai]
Yawiraj, N. (2017). Organizational change and development management (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Triple Group Company Limited. [in Thai]